Cargando…

Integrating technology into complex intervention trial processes: a case study

BACKGROUND: Trials of complex interventions are associated with high costs and burdens in terms of paperwork, management, data collection, validation, and intervention fidelity assessment occurring across multiple sites. Traditional data collection methods rely on paper-based forms, where processing...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drew, Cheney J. G., Poile, Vincent, Trubey, Rob, Watson, Gareth, Kelson, Mark, Townson, Julia, Rosser, Anne, Hood, Kerenza, Quinn, Lori, Busse, Monica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5114753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27855710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1674-9
_version_ 1782468399331278848
author Drew, Cheney J. G.
Poile, Vincent
Trubey, Rob
Watson, Gareth
Kelson, Mark
Townson, Julia
Rosser, Anne
Hood, Kerenza
Quinn, Lori
Busse, Monica
author_facet Drew, Cheney J. G.
Poile, Vincent
Trubey, Rob
Watson, Gareth
Kelson, Mark
Townson, Julia
Rosser, Anne
Hood, Kerenza
Quinn, Lori
Busse, Monica
author_sort Drew, Cheney J. G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Trials of complex interventions are associated with high costs and burdens in terms of paperwork, management, data collection, validation, and intervention fidelity assessment occurring across multiple sites. Traditional data collection methods rely on paper-based forms, where processing can be time-consuming and error rates high. Electronic source data collection can potentially address many of these inefficiencies, but has not routinely been used in complex intervention trials. Here we present the use of an on-line system for managing all aspects of data handling and for the monitoring of trial processes in a multicentre trial of a complex intervention. We custom built a web-accessible software application for the delivery of ENGAGE-HD, a multicentre trial of a complex physical therapy intervention. The software incorporated functionality for participant randomisation, data collection and assessment of intervention fidelity. It was accessible to multiple users with differing levels of access depending on required usage or to maintain blinding. Each site was supplied with a 4G-enabled iPad for accessing the system. The impact of this system was quantified through review of data quality and collation of feedback from site coordinators and assessors through structured process interviews. RESULTS: The custom-built system was an efficient tool for collecting data and managing trial processes. Although the set-up time required was significant, using the system resulted in an overall data completion rate of 98.5% with a data query rate of 0.1%, the majority of which were resolved in under a week. Feedback from research staff indicated that the system was highly acceptable for use in a research environment. This was a reflection of the portability and accessibility of the system when using the iPad and its usefulness in aiding accurate data collection, intervention fidelity and general administration. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of commercially available hardware and a bespoke online database designed to support data collection, intervention fidelity and trial progress provides a viable option for streamlining trial processes in a multicentre complex intervention trial. There is scope to further extend the system to cater for larger trials and add further functionality such as automatic reporting facilities and participant management support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN65378754, registered on 13 March 2014.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5114753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51147532016-11-28 Integrating technology into complex intervention trial processes: a case study Drew, Cheney J. G. Poile, Vincent Trubey, Rob Watson, Gareth Kelson, Mark Townson, Julia Rosser, Anne Hood, Kerenza Quinn, Lori Busse, Monica Trials Methodology BACKGROUND: Trials of complex interventions are associated with high costs and burdens in terms of paperwork, management, data collection, validation, and intervention fidelity assessment occurring across multiple sites. Traditional data collection methods rely on paper-based forms, where processing can be time-consuming and error rates high. Electronic source data collection can potentially address many of these inefficiencies, but has not routinely been used in complex intervention trials. Here we present the use of an on-line system for managing all aspects of data handling and for the monitoring of trial processes in a multicentre trial of a complex intervention. We custom built a web-accessible software application for the delivery of ENGAGE-HD, a multicentre trial of a complex physical therapy intervention. The software incorporated functionality for participant randomisation, data collection and assessment of intervention fidelity. It was accessible to multiple users with differing levels of access depending on required usage or to maintain blinding. Each site was supplied with a 4G-enabled iPad for accessing the system. The impact of this system was quantified through review of data quality and collation of feedback from site coordinators and assessors through structured process interviews. RESULTS: The custom-built system was an efficient tool for collecting data and managing trial processes. Although the set-up time required was significant, using the system resulted in an overall data completion rate of 98.5% with a data query rate of 0.1%, the majority of which were resolved in under a week. Feedback from research staff indicated that the system was highly acceptable for use in a research environment. This was a reflection of the portability and accessibility of the system when using the iPad and its usefulness in aiding accurate data collection, intervention fidelity and general administration. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of commercially available hardware and a bespoke online database designed to support data collection, intervention fidelity and trial progress provides a viable option for streamlining trial processes in a multicentre complex intervention trial. There is scope to further extend the system to cater for larger trials and add further functionality such as automatic reporting facilities and participant management support. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN65378754, registered on 13 March 2014. BioMed Central 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5114753/ /pubmed/27855710 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1674-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Methodology
Drew, Cheney J. G.
Poile, Vincent
Trubey, Rob
Watson, Gareth
Kelson, Mark
Townson, Julia
Rosser, Anne
Hood, Kerenza
Quinn, Lori
Busse, Monica
Integrating technology into complex intervention trial processes: a case study
title Integrating technology into complex intervention trial processes: a case study
title_full Integrating technology into complex intervention trial processes: a case study
title_fullStr Integrating technology into complex intervention trial processes: a case study
title_full_unstemmed Integrating technology into complex intervention trial processes: a case study
title_short Integrating technology into complex intervention trial processes: a case study
title_sort integrating technology into complex intervention trial processes: a case study
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5114753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27855710
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1674-9
work_keys_str_mv AT drewcheneyjg integratingtechnologyintocomplexinterventiontrialprocessesacasestudy
AT poilevincent integratingtechnologyintocomplexinterventiontrialprocessesacasestudy
AT trubeyrob integratingtechnologyintocomplexinterventiontrialprocessesacasestudy
AT watsongareth integratingtechnologyintocomplexinterventiontrialprocessesacasestudy
AT kelsonmark integratingtechnologyintocomplexinterventiontrialprocessesacasestudy
AT townsonjulia integratingtechnologyintocomplexinterventiontrialprocessesacasestudy
AT rosseranne integratingtechnologyintocomplexinterventiontrialprocessesacasestudy
AT hoodkerenza integratingtechnologyintocomplexinterventiontrialprocessesacasestudy
AT quinnlori integratingtechnologyintocomplexinterventiontrialprocessesacasestudy
AT bussemonica integratingtechnologyintocomplexinterventiontrialprocessesacasestudy