Cargando…

Evaluation of a new imaging tool for use with major trauma cases in the emergency department

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate potential benefits of a new diagnostic software prototype (Trauma Viewer, TV) automatically reformatting computed tomography (CT) data on diagnostic speed and quality, compared to CT-image data evaluation using a conventional CT console. METHODS: Mul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crönlein, Moritz, Holzapfel, Konstantin, Beirer, Marc, Postl, Lukas, Kanz, Karl-Georg, Pförringer, Dominik, Huber-Wagner, Stefan, Biberthaler, Peter, Kirchhoff, Chlodwig
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5114770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27855665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1337-8
_version_ 1782468402793676800
author Crönlein, Moritz
Holzapfel, Konstantin
Beirer, Marc
Postl, Lukas
Kanz, Karl-Georg
Pförringer, Dominik
Huber-Wagner, Stefan
Biberthaler, Peter
Kirchhoff, Chlodwig
author_facet Crönlein, Moritz
Holzapfel, Konstantin
Beirer, Marc
Postl, Lukas
Kanz, Karl-Georg
Pförringer, Dominik
Huber-Wagner, Stefan
Biberthaler, Peter
Kirchhoff, Chlodwig
author_sort Crönlein, Moritz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate potential benefits of a new diagnostic software prototype (Trauma Viewer, TV) automatically reformatting computed tomography (CT) data on diagnostic speed and quality, compared to CT-image data evaluation using a conventional CT console. METHODS: Multiple trauma CT data sets were analysed by one expert radiology and one expert traumatology fellow independently twice, once using the TV and once using the secondary conventional CT console placed in the CT control room. Actual analysis time and precision of diagnoses assessment were evaluated. The TV and CT-console results were compared respectively, but also a comparison to the initial multiple trauma CT reports assessed by emergency radiology fellows considered as the gold standard was performed. Finally, design and function of the Trauma Viewer were evaluated in a descriptive manner. RESULTS: CT data sets of 30 multiple trauma patients were enrolled. Mean time needed for analysis of one CT dataset was 2.43 min using the CT console and 3.58 min using the TV respectively. Thus, secondary conventional CT console analysis was on average 1.15 min shorter compared to the TV analysis. Both readers missed a total of 11 diagnoses using the secondary conventional CT console compared to 12 missed diagnoses using the TV. However, none of these overlooked diagnoses resulted in an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) > 2 corresponding to life threatening injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Even though it took the two expert fellows a little longer to analyse the CT scans on the prototype TV compared to the CT console, which can be explained by the new user interface of the TV, our preliminary results demonstrate that, after further development, the TV might serve as a new diagnostic feature in the trauma room management. Its high potential to improve time and quality of CT-based diagnoses might help in fast decision making regarding treatment of severely injured patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5114770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51147702016-11-25 Evaluation of a new imaging tool for use with major trauma cases in the emergency department Crönlein, Moritz Holzapfel, Konstantin Beirer, Marc Postl, Lukas Kanz, Karl-Georg Pförringer, Dominik Huber-Wagner, Stefan Biberthaler, Peter Kirchhoff, Chlodwig BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate potential benefits of a new diagnostic software prototype (Trauma Viewer, TV) automatically reformatting computed tomography (CT) data on diagnostic speed and quality, compared to CT-image data evaluation using a conventional CT console. METHODS: Multiple trauma CT data sets were analysed by one expert radiology and one expert traumatology fellow independently twice, once using the TV and once using the secondary conventional CT console placed in the CT control room. Actual analysis time and precision of diagnoses assessment were evaluated. The TV and CT-console results were compared respectively, but also a comparison to the initial multiple trauma CT reports assessed by emergency radiology fellows considered as the gold standard was performed. Finally, design and function of the Trauma Viewer were evaluated in a descriptive manner. RESULTS: CT data sets of 30 multiple trauma patients were enrolled. Mean time needed for analysis of one CT dataset was 2.43 min using the CT console and 3.58 min using the TV respectively. Thus, secondary conventional CT console analysis was on average 1.15 min shorter compared to the TV analysis. Both readers missed a total of 11 diagnoses using the secondary conventional CT console compared to 12 missed diagnoses using the TV. However, none of these overlooked diagnoses resulted in an Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) > 2 corresponding to life threatening injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Even though it took the two expert fellows a little longer to analyse the CT scans on the prototype TV compared to the CT console, which can be explained by the new user interface of the TV, our preliminary results demonstrate that, after further development, the TV might serve as a new diagnostic feature in the trauma room management. Its high potential to improve time and quality of CT-based diagnoses might help in fast decision making regarding treatment of severely injured patients. BioMed Central 2016-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5114770/ /pubmed/27855665 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1337-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Crönlein, Moritz
Holzapfel, Konstantin
Beirer, Marc
Postl, Lukas
Kanz, Karl-Georg
Pförringer, Dominik
Huber-Wagner, Stefan
Biberthaler, Peter
Kirchhoff, Chlodwig
Evaluation of a new imaging tool for use with major trauma cases in the emergency department
title Evaluation of a new imaging tool for use with major trauma cases in the emergency department
title_full Evaluation of a new imaging tool for use with major trauma cases in the emergency department
title_fullStr Evaluation of a new imaging tool for use with major trauma cases in the emergency department
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of a new imaging tool for use with major trauma cases in the emergency department
title_short Evaluation of a new imaging tool for use with major trauma cases in the emergency department
title_sort evaluation of a new imaging tool for use with major trauma cases in the emergency department
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5114770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27855665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1337-8
work_keys_str_mv AT cronleinmoritz evaluationofanewimagingtoolforusewithmajortraumacasesintheemergencydepartment
AT holzapfelkonstantin evaluationofanewimagingtoolforusewithmajortraumacasesintheemergencydepartment
AT beirermarc evaluationofanewimagingtoolforusewithmajortraumacasesintheemergencydepartment
AT postllukas evaluationofanewimagingtoolforusewithmajortraumacasesintheemergencydepartment
AT kanzkarlgeorg evaluationofanewimagingtoolforusewithmajortraumacasesintheemergencydepartment
AT pforringerdominik evaluationofanewimagingtoolforusewithmajortraumacasesintheemergencydepartment
AT huberwagnerstefan evaluationofanewimagingtoolforusewithmajortraumacasesintheemergencydepartment
AT biberthalerpeter evaluationofanewimagingtoolforusewithmajortraumacasesintheemergencydepartment
AT kirchhoffchlodwig evaluationofanewimagingtoolforusewithmajortraumacasesintheemergencydepartment