Cargando…

Validation of critical care pain observation tool in patients hospitalized in surgical wards

BACKGROUND: Application of a reliable and authentic behavioral tool for measuring patients’ pain, hospitalized in intensive care units who are not able to establish relationship, is needed severely. Therefore, this study is conducted with the aim of validating Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CP...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rafiei, Malihe, Ghadami, Ahmad, Irajpour, Alireza, Feizi, Avat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5114789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27904628
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.193391
_version_ 1782468406927163392
author Rafiei, Malihe
Ghadami, Ahmad
Irajpour, Alireza
Feizi, Avat
author_facet Rafiei, Malihe
Ghadami, Ahmad
Irajpour, Alireza
Feizi, Avat
author_sort Rafiei, Malihe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Application of a reliable and authentic behavioral tool for measuring patients’ pain, hospitalized in intensive care units who are not able to establish relationship, is needed severely. Therefore, this study is conducted with the aim of validating Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) in patients hospitalized in surgical wards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CPOT was first translated into Persian and was psychometrically measured in terms of content. RESULTS: It should be noted that the content validity of CPOT was approved by panel of specialists. In addition, validity of this tool was confirmed with high internal cluster correlation (nonpainful procedure (0.997) and painful procedure (0.726). The diagnostic validity was supported with the increased CPOT score during position change and its constancy during the measurement of blood pressure (P < 0.001). Despite higher NRS scores than CPOT, CPOT criterion validity was confirmed due to the correlation between the scores obtained by these two tools (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CPOT is a valid and reliable tool to study pain in patients hospitalized in intensive care units.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5114789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51147892016-11-30 Validation of critical care pain observation tool in patients hospitalized in surgical wards Rafiei, Malihe Ghadami, Ahmad Irajpour, Alireza Feizi, Avat Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Application of a reliable and authentic behavioral tool for measuring patients’ pain, hospitalized in intensive care units who are not able to establish relationship, is needed severely. Therefore, this study is conducted with the aim of validating Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) in patients hospitalized in surgical wards. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CPOT was first translated into Persian and was psychometrically measured in terms of content. RESULTS: It should be noted that the content validity of CPOT was approved by panel of specialists. In addition, validity of this tool was confirmed with high internal cluster correlation (nonpainful procedure (0.997) and painful procedure (0.726). The diagnostic validity was supported with the increased CPOT score during position change and its constancy during the measurement of blood pressure (P < 0.001). Despite higher NRS scores than CPOT, CPOT criterion validity was confirmed due to the correlation between the scores obtained by these two tools (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CPOT is a valid and reliable tool to study pain in patients hospitalized in intensive care units. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5114789/ /pubmed/27904628 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.193391 Text en Copyright: © Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rafiei, Malihe
Ghadami, Ahmad
Irajpour, Alireza
Feizi, Avat
Validation of critical care pain observation tool in patients hospitalized in surgical wards
title Validation of critical care pain observation tool in patients hospitalized in surgical wards
title_full Validation of critical care pain observation tool in patients hospitalized in surgical wards
title_fullStr Validation of critical care pain observation tool in patients hospitalized in surgical wards
title_full_unstemmed Validation of critical care pain observation tool in patients hospitalized in surgical wards
title_short Validation of critical care pain observation tool in patients hospitalized in surgical wards
title_sort validation of critical care pain observation tool in patients hospitalized in surgical wards
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5114789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27904628
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1735-9066.193391
work_keys_str_mv AT rafieimalihe validationofcriticalcarepainobservationtoolinpatientshospitalizedinsurgicalwards
AT ghadamiahmad validationofcriticalcarepainobservationtoolinpatientshospitalizedinsurgicalwards
AT irajpouralireza validationofcriticalcarepainobservationtoolinpatientshospitalizedinsurgicalwards
AT feiziavat validationofcriticalcarepainobservationtoolinpatientshospitalizedinsurgicalwards