Cargando…

Follow-up in Head and Neck Cancer: Do More Does It Mean Do Better? A Systematic Review and Our Proposal Based on Our Experience

As the patients population ages, cancer screening increases, and cancer treatments improve, millions more head and neck carcinoma (HNC) patients will be classified as cancer survivors in the future. Change in epidemiology with human papillomavirus related HNC leads to a number of young treated patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Denaro, Nerina, Merlano, Marco Carlo, Russi, Elvio Grazioso
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5115151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27337948
http://dx.doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2015.00976
_version_ 1782468475111866368
author Denaro, Nerina
Merlano, Marco Carlo
Russi, Elvio Grazioso
author_facet Denaro, Nerina
Merlano, Marco Carlo
Russi, Elvio Grazioso
author_sort Denaro, Nerina
collection PubMed
description As the patients population ages, cancer screening increases, and cancer treatments improve, millions more head and neck carcinoma (HNC) patients will be classified as cancer survivors in the future. Change in epidemiology with human papillomavirus related HNC leads to a number of young treated patients. After treatment for HNC intensive surveillance, including ear, nose and throat (ENT) endoscopy, imaging, and serology, confers a survival benefit that became less evident in unresectable recurrence. We performed a comprehensive revision of literature and analyzed the experience of our centre. We revised publications on this topic and added data derived from the interdisciplinary work of experts within medical oncology, ENT, and radiation oncology scientific societies. We retrospectively collected local and distant recurrence of chemoradiation treated patients at Santa Croce and Carle University Hospital. A HNC follow-up program is not already codified and worldwide accepted. There is a need of scheduled follow-up. We suggest adopting a standardized follow-up guideline, although a multidisciplinary approach is frequently requested to tailor surveillance program and treatment on each patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5115151
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51151512016-12-01 Follow-up in Head and Neck Cancer: Do More Does It Mean Do Better? A Systematic Review and Our Proposal Based on Our Experience Denaro, Nerina Merlano, Marco Carlo Russi, Elvio Grazioso Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol Review As the patients population ages, cancer screening increases, and cancer treatments improve, millions more head and neck carcinoma (HNC) patients will be classified as cancer survivors in the future. Change in epidemiology with human papillomavirus related HNC leads to a number of young treated patients. After treatment for HNC intensive surveillance, including ear, nose and throat (ENT) endoscopy, imaging, and serology, confers a survival benefit that became less evident in unresectable recurrence. We performed a comprehensive revision of literature and analyzed the experience of our centre. We revised publications on this topic and added data derived from the interdisciplinary work of experts within medical oncology, ENT, and radiation oncology scientific societies. We retrospectively collected local and distant recurrence of chemoradiation treated patients at Santa Croce and Carle University Hospital. A HNC follow-up program is not already codified and worldwide accepted. There is a need of scheduled follow-up. We suggest adopting a standardized follow-up guideline, although a multidisciplinary approach is frequently requested to tailor surveillance program and treatment on each patient. Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 2016-12 2016-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5115151/ /pubmed/27337948 http://dx.doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2015.00976 Text en Copyright © 2016 by Korean Society of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Denaro, Nerina
Merlano, Marco Carlo
Russi, Elvio Grazioso
Follow-up in Head and Neck Cancer: Do More Does It Mean Do Better? A Systematic Review and Our Proposal Based on Our Experience
title Follow-up in Head and Neck Cancer: Do More Does It Mean Do Better? A Systematic Review and Our Proposal Based on Our Experience
title_full Follow-up in Head and Neck Cancer: Do More Does It Mean Do Better? A Systematic Review and Our Proposal Based on Our Experience
title_fullStr Follow-up in Head and Neck Cancer: Do More Does It Mean Do Better? A Systematic Review and Our Proposal Based on Our Experience
title_full_unstemmed Follow-up in Head and Neck Cancer: Do More Does It Mean Do Better? A Systematic Review and Our Proposal Based on Our Experience
title_short Follow-up in Head and Neck Cancer: Do More Does It Mean Do Better? A Systematic Review and Our Proposal Based on Our Experience
title_sort follow-up in head and neck cancer: do more does it mean do better? a systematic review and our proposal based on our experience
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5115151/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27337948
http://dx.doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2015.00976
work_keys_str_mv AT denaronerina followupinheadandneckcancerdomoredoesitmeandobetterasystematicreviewandourproposalbasedonourexperience
AT merlanomarcocarlo followupinheadandneckcancerdomoredoesitmeandobetterasystematicreviewandourproposalbasedonourexperience
AT russielviograzioso followupinheadandneckcancerdomoredoesitmeandobetterasystematicreviewandourproposalbasedonourexperience