Cargando…

Stored Canine Whole Blood Units: What is the Real Risk of Bacterial Contamination?

BACKGROUND: Bacterial contamination of whole blood (WB) units can result in transfusion‐transmitted infection, but the extent of the risk has not been established and may be underestimated in veterinary medicine. OBJECTIVES: To detect, quantify, and identify bacterial microorganisms in 49 canine WB...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miglio, A., Stefanetti, V., Antognoni, M.T., Cappelli, K., Capomaccio, S., Coletti, M., Passamonti, F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5115181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27734567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14593
_version_ 1782468479455068160
author Miglio, A.
Stefanetti, V.
Antognoni, M.T.
Cappelli, K.
Capomaccio, S.
Coletti, M.
Passamonti, F.
author_facet Miglio, A.
Stefanetti, V.
Antognoni, M.T.
Cappelli, K.
Capomaccio, S.
Coletti, M.
Passamonti, F.
author_sort Miglio, A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bacterial contamination of whole blood (WB) units can result in transfusion‐transmitted infection, but the extent of the risk has not been established and may be underestimated in veterinary medicine. OBJECTIVES: To detect, quantify, and identify bacterial microorganisms in 49 canine WB units during their shelf life. ANIMALS: Forty‐nine healthy adult dogs. METHODS: Forty‐nine WB units were included in the study. Immediately after collection, 8 sterile samples from the tube segment line of each unit were aseptically collected and tested for bacterial contamination on days 0, 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 of storage. A qPCR assay was performed on days 0, 21, and 35 to identify and quantify any bacterial DNA. RESULTS: On bacterial culture, 47/49 blood units were negative at all time points tested, 1 unit was positive for Enterococcus spp. on days 0 and 1, and 1 was positive for Escherichia coli on day 35. On qPCR assay, 26 of 49 blood units were positive on at least 1 time point and the bacterial loads of the sequences detected (Propionobacterium spp., Corynebacterium spp., Caulobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp., Enterococcus spp., Serratia spp., and Leucobacter spp.) were <80 genome equivalents (GE)/μL. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Most of the organisms detected were common bacteria, not usually implicated in septic transfusion reactions. The very low number of GE detected constitutes an acceptable risk of bacterial contamination, indicating that WB units have a good sanitary shelf life during commercial storage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5115181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51151812016-11-25 Stored Canine Whole Blood Units: What is the Real Risk of Bacterial Contamination? Miglio, A. Stefanetti, V. Antognoni, M.T. Cappelli, K. Capomaccio, S. Coletti, M. Passamonti, F. J Vet Intern Med SMALL ANIMAL BACKGROUND: Bacterial contamination of whole blood (WB) units can result in transfusion‐transmitted infection, but the extent of the risk has not been established and may be underestimated in veterinary medicine. OBJECTIVES: To detect, quantify, and identify bacterial microorganisms in 49 canine WB units during their shelf life. ANIMALS: Forty‐nine healthy adult dogs. METHODS: Forty‐nine WB units were included in the study. Immediately after collection, 8 sterile samples from the tube segment line of each unit were aseptically collected and tested for bacterial contamination on days 0, 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 of storage. A qPCR assay was performed on days 0, 21, and 35 to identify and quantify any bacterial DNA. RESULTS: On bacterial culture, 47/49 blood units were negative at all time points tested, 1 unit was positive for Enterococcus spp. on days 0 and 1, and 1 was positive for Escherichia coli on day 35. On qPCR assay, 26 of 49 blood units were positive on at least 1 time point and the bacterial loads of the sequences detected (Propionobacterium spp., Corynebacterium spp., Caulobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp., Enterococcus spp., Serratia spp., and Leucobacter spp.) were <80 genome equivalents (GE)/μL. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Most of the organisms detected were common bacteria, not usually implicated in septic transfusion reactions. The very low number of GE detected constitutes an acceptable risk of bacterial contamination, indicating that WB units have a good sanitary shelf life during commercial storage. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-10-13 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5115181/ /pubmed/27734567 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14593 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle SMALL ANIMAL
Miglio, A.
Stefanetti, V.
Antognoni, M.T.
Cappelli, K.
Capomaccio, S.
Coletti, M.
Passamonti, F.
Stored Canine Whole Blood Units: What is the Real Risk of Bacterial Contamination?
title Stored Canine Whole Blood Units: What is the Real Risk of Bacterial Contamination?
title_full Stored Canine Whole Blood Units: What is the Real Risk of Bacterial Contamination?
title_fullStr Stored Canine Whole Blood Units: What is the Real Risk of Bacterial Contamination?
title_full_unstemmed Stored Canine Whole Blood Units: What is the Real Risk of Bacterial Contamination?
title_short Stored Canine Whole Blood Units: What is the Real Risk of Bacterial Contamination?
title_sort stored canine whole blood units: what is the real risk of bacterial contamination?
topic SMALL ANIMAL
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5115181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27734567
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.14593
work_keys_str_mv AT miglioa storedcaninewholebloodunitswhatistherealriskofbacterialcontamination
AT stefanettiv storedcaninewholebloodunitswhatistherealriskofbacterialcontamination
AT antognonimt storedcaninewholebloodunitswhatistherealriskofbacterialcontamination
AT cappellik storedcaninewholebloodunitswhatistherealriskofbacterialcontamination
AT capomaccios storedcaninewholebloodunitswhatistherealriskofbacterialcontamination
AT colettim storedcaninewholebloodunitswhatistherealriskofbacterialcontamination
AT passamontif storedcaninewholebloodunitswhatistherealriskofbacterialcontamination