Cargando…

Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT in normal and diseased eyes

PURPOSE: Sub-foveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) is affected in many ocular diseases. The aim of this study was to compare SFCT measurements between Topcon 3D 2000 spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and Topcon swept-source OCT (SS-OCT), with different laser wavelengths, in normal an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zafar, Sidra, Siddiqui, MA Rehman, Shahzad, Rida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5115687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881909
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S117022
_version_ 1782468551880212480
author Zafar, Sidra
Siddiqui, MA Rehman
Shahzad, Rida
author_facet Zafar, Sidra
Siddiqui, MA Rehman
Shahzad, Rida
author_sort Zafar, Sidra
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Sub-foveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) is affected in many ocular diseases. The aim of this study was to compare SFCT measurements between Topcon 3D 2000 spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and Topcon swept-source OCT (SS-OCT), with different laser wavelengths, in normal and diseased populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, cross-sectional, noninterventional study including 27 normal volunteers and 27 participants with retinal disease. OCT scans were performed sequentially and under standardized conditions using both SD-OCT and SS-OCT. The OCT scans were evaluated by two independent graders. Paired t-tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess the statistically significant difference between SFCT measurements as measured by the two devices. RESULTS: Mean SFCT measurements for all 54 participants were 264.9±103.1 μm using SD-OCT (range: 47–470 μm) and 278.5±110.5 μm using SS-OCT (range: 56–502 μm), with an inter-device ICC of 0.850. Greater variability was noted in the diseased eyes. Inter-device ICCs were 0.870 (95% CI; 0.760–0.924) and 0.840 (95% CI; 0.654–0.930) for normal and diseased eyes, respectively. However, the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.132). CONCLUSION: Both machines reliably measure SFCT. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5115687
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51156872016-11-23 Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT in normal and diseased eyes Zafar, Sidra Siddiqui, MA Rehman Shahzad, Rida Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: Sub-foveal choroidal thickness (SFCT) is affected in many ocular diseases. The aim of this study was to compare SFCT measurements between Topcon 3D 2000 spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and Topcon swept-source OCT (SS-OCT), with different laser wavelengths, in normal and diseased populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, cross-sectional, noninterventional study including 27 normal volunteers and 27 participants with retinal disease. OCT scans were performed sequentially and under standardized conditions using both SD-OCT and SS-OCT. The OCT scans were evaluated by two independent graders. Paired t-tests and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess the statistically significant difference between SFCT measurements as measured by the two devices. RESULTS: Mean SFCT measurements for all 54 participants were 264.9±103.1 μm using SD-OCT (range: 47–470 μm) and 278.5±110.5 μm using SS-OCT (range: 56–502 μm), with an inter-device ICC of 0.850. Greater variability was noted in the diseased eyes. Inter-device ICCs were 0.870 (95% CI; 0.760–0.924) and 0.840 (95% CI; 0.654–0.930) for normal and diseased eyes, respectively. However, the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.132). CONCLUSION: Both machines reliably measure SFCT. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings. Dove Medical Press 2016-11-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5115687/ /pubmed/27881909 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S117022 Text en © 2016 Zafar et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Zafar, Sidra
Siddiqui, MA Rehman
Shahzad, Rida
Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT in normal and diseased eyes
title Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT in normal and diseased eyes
title_full Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT in normal and diseased eyes
title_fullStr Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT in normal and diseased eyes
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT in normal and diseased eyes
title_short Comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral-domain OCT and swept-source OCT in normal and diseased eyes
title_sort comparison of choroidal thickness measurements between spectral-domain oct and swept-source oct in normal and diseased eyes
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5115687/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881909
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S117022
work_keys_str_mv AT zafarsidra comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsbetweenspectraldomainoctandsweptsourceoctinnormalanddiseasedeyes
AT siddiquimarehman comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsbetweenspectraldomainoctandsweptsourceoctinnormalanddiseasedeyes
AT shahzadrida comparisonofchoroidalthicknessmeasurementsbetweenspectraldomainoctandsweptsourceoctinnormalanddiseasedeyes