Cargando…

Comparison of an automatic analysis and a manual analysis of conjunctival microcirculation in a sheep model of haemorrhagic shock

BACKGROUND: Life-threatening diseases of critically ill patients are known to derange microcirculation. Automatic analysis of microcirculation would provide a bedside diagnostic tool for microcirculatory disorders and allow immediate therapeutic decisions based upon microcirculation analysis. METHOD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arnemann, Philip-Helge, Hessler, Michael, Kampmeier, Tim, Morelli, Andrea, Van Aken, Hugo Karel, Westphal, Martin, Rehberg, Sebastian, Ertmer, Christian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27864774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-016-0110-5
_version_ 1782468597192327168
author Arnemann, Philip-Helge
Hessler, Michael
Kampmeier, Tim
Morelli, Andrea
Van Aken, Hugo Karel
Westphal, Martin
Rehberg, Sebastian
Ertmer, Christian
author_facet Arnemann, Philip-Helge
Hessler, Michael
Kampmeier, Tim
Morelli, Andrea
Van Aken, Hugo Karel
Westphal, Martin
Rehberg, Sebastian
Ertmer, Christian
author_sort Arnemann, Philip-Helge
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Life-threatening diseases of critically ill patients are known to derange microcirculation. Automatic analysis of microcirculation would provide a bedside diagnostic tool for microcirculatory disorders and allow immediate therapeutic decisions based upon microcirculation analysis. METHODS: After induction of general anaesthesia and instrumentation for haemodynamic monitoring, haemorrhagic shock was induced in ten female sheep by stepwise blood withdrawal of 3 × 10 mL per kilogram body weight. Before and after the induction of haemorrhagic shock, haemodynamic variables, samples for blood gas analysis, and videos of conjunctival microcirculation were obtained by incident dark field illumination microscopy. Microcirculatory videos were analysed (1) manually with AVA software version 3.2 by an experienced user and (2) automatically by AVA software version 4.2 for total vessel density (TVD), perfused vessel density (PVD) and proportion of perfused vessels (PPV). Correlation between the two analysis methods was examined by intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: The induction of haemorrhagic shock decreased the mean arterial pressure (from 87 ± 11 to 40 ± 7 mmHg; p < 0.001); stroke volume index (from 38 ± 14 to 20 ± 5 ml·m(−2); p = 0.001) and cardiac index (from 2.9 ± 0.9 to 1.8 ± 0.5 L·min(−1)·m(−2); p < 0.001) and increased the heart rate (from 72 ± 9 to 87 ± 11 bpm; p < 0.001) and lactate concentration (from 0.9 ± 0.3 to 2.0 ± 0.6 mmol·L(−1); p = 0.001). Manual analysis showed no change in TVD (17.8 ± 4.2 to 17.8 ± 3.8 mm*mm(−2); p = 0.993), whereas PVD (from 15.6 ± 4.6 to 11.5 ± 6.5 mm*mm(−2); p = 0.041) and PPV (from 85.9 ± 11.8 to 62.7 ± 29.6%; p = 0.017) decreased significantly. Automatic analysis was not able to identify these changes. Correlation analysis showed a poor correlation between the analysis methods and a wide spread of values in Bland-Altman analysis. CONCLUSIONS: As characteristic changes in microcirculation during ovine haemorrhagic shock were not detected by automatic analysis and correlation between automatic and manual analyses (current gold standard) was poor, the use of the investigated software for automatic analysis of microcirculation cannot be recommended in its current version at least in the investigated model. Further improvements in automatic vessel detection are needed before its routine use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40635-016-0110-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5116019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51160192016-12-02 Comparison of an automatic analysis and a manual analysis of conjunctival microcirculation in a sheep model of haemorrhagic shock Arnemann, Philip-Helge Hessler, Michael Kampmeier, Tim Morelli, Andrea Van Aken, Hugo Karel Westphal, Martin Rehberg, Sebastian Ertmer, Christian Intensive Care Med Exp Research BACKGROUND: Life-threatening diseases of critically ill patients are known to derange microcirculation. Automatic analysis of microcirculation would provide a bedside diagnostic tool for microcirculatory disorders and allow immediate therapeutic decisions based upon microcirculation analysis. METHODS: After induction of general anaesthesia and instrumentation for haemodynamic monitoring, haemorrhagic shock was induced in ten female sheep by stepwise blood withdrawal of 3 × 10 mL per kilogram body weight. Before and after the induction of haemorrhagic shock, haemodynamic variables, samples for blood gas analysis, and videos of conjunctival microcirculation were obtained by incident dark field illumination microscopy. Microcirculatory videos were analysed (1) manually with AVA software version 3.2 by an experienced user and (2) automatically by AVA software version 4.2 for total vessel density (TVD), perfused vessel density (PVD) and proportion of perfused vessels (PPV). Correlation between the two analysis methods was examined by intraclass correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: The induction of haemorrhagic shock decreased the mean arterial pressure (from 87 ± 11 to 40 ± 7 mmHg; p < 0.001); stroke volume index (from 38 ± 14 to 20 ± 5 ml·m(−2); p = 0.001) and cardiac index (from 2.9 ± 0.9 to 1.8 ± 0.5 L·min(−1)·m(−2); p < 0.001) and increased the heart rate (from 72 ± 9 to 87 ± 11 bpm; p < 0.001) and lactate concentration (from 0.9 ± 0.3 to 2.0 ± 0.6 mmol·L(−1); p = 0.001). Manual analysis showed no change in TVD (17.8 ± 4.2 to 17.8 ± 3.8 mm*mm(−2); p = 0.993), whereas PVD (from 15.6 ± 4.6 to 11.5 ± 6.5 mm*mm(−2); p = 0.041) and PPV (from 85.9 ± 11.8 to 62.7 ± 29.6%; p = 0.017) decreased significantly. Automatic analysis was not able to identify these changes. Correlation analysis showed a poor correlation between the analysis methods and a wide spread of values in Bland-Altman analysis. CONCLUSIONS: As characteristic changes in microcirculation during ovine haemorrhagic shock were not detected by automatic analysis and correlation between automatic and manual analyses (current gold standard) was poor, the use of the investigated software for automatic analysis of microcirculation cannot be recommended in its current version at least in the investigated model. Further improvements in automatic vessel detection are needed before its routine use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40635-016-0110-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5116019/ /pubmed/27864774 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-016-0110-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Arnemann, Philip-Helge
Hessler, Michael
Kampmeier, Tim
Morelli, Andrea
Van Aken, Hugo Karel
Westphal, Martin
Rehberg, Sebastian
Ertmer, Christian
Comparison of an automatic analysis and a manual analysis of conjunctival microcirculation in a sheep model of haemorrhagic shock
title Comparison of an automatic analysis and a manual analysis of conjunctival microcirculation in a sheep model of haemorrhagic shock
title_full Comparison of an automatic analysis and a manual analysis of conjunctival microcirculation in a sheep model of haemorrhagic shock
title_fullStr Comparison of an automatic analysis and a manual analysis of conjunctival microcirculation in a sheep model of haemorrhagic shock
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of an automatic analysis and a manual analysis of conjunctival microcirculation in a sheep model of haemorrhagic shock
title_short Comparison of an automatic analysis and a manual analysis of conjunctival microcirculation in a sheep model of haemorrhagic shock
title_sort comparison of an automatic analysis and a manual analysis of conjunctival microcirculation in a sheep model of haemorrhagic shock
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27864774
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40635-016-0110-5
work_keys_str_mv AT arnemannphiliphelge comparisonofanautomaticanalysisandamanualanalysisofconjunctivalmicrocirculationinasheepmodelofhaemorrhagicshock
AT hesslermichael comparisonofanautomaticanalysisandamanualanalysisofconjunctivalmicrocirculationinasheepmodelofhaemorrhagicshock
AT kampmeiertim comparisonofanautomaticanalysisandamanualanalysisofconjunctivalmicrocirculationinasheepmodelofhaemorrhagicshock
AT morelliandrea comparisonofanautomaticanalysisandamanualanalysisofconjunctivalmicrocirculationinasheepmodelofhaemorrhagicshock
AT vanakenhugokarel comparisonofanautomaticanalysisandamanualanalysisofconjunctivalmicrocirculationinasheepmodelofhaemorrhagicshock
AT westphalmartin comparisonofanautomaticanalysisandamanualanalysisofconjunctivalmicrocirculationinasheepmodelofhaemorrhagicshock
AT rehbergsebastian comparisonofanautomaticanalysisandamanualanalysisofconjunctivalmicrocirculationinasheepmodelofhaemorrhagicshock
AT ertmerchristian comparisonofanautomaticanalysisandamanualanalysisofconjunctivalmicrocirculationinasheepmodelofhaemorrhagicshock