Cargando…

Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes for Gastroesophageal Tumors in Low Volume Units: A Multicenter Survey

Background and Aims. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) outcomes have traditionally been reported from high volume centers in East Asia. Data from low volume centers in other parts of Asia remain sparse. Methods. A retrospective survey with a structured questionnaire of 5 tertiary centers in 3 c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Najib Azmi, Ahmad, Khor, Christopher J. L., Ho, Khek-Yu, Pittayanon, Rapat, Rerknimitr, Rungsun, Ratanachu-ek, Thawee, Koay, Doreen S. C., Koh, Jianyi Calvin, Ho, Shiaw-Hooi, Goh, Khean-Lee, Mahadeva, Sanjiv
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5670564
_version_ 1782468673299021824
author Najib Azmi, Ahmad
Khor, Christopher J. L.
Ho, Khek-Yu
Pittayanon, Rapat
Rerknimitr, Rungsun
Ratanachu-ek, Thawee
Koay, Doreen S. C.
Koh, Jianyi Calvin
Ho, Shiaw-Hooi
Goh, Khean-Lee
Mahadeva, Sanjiv
author_facet Najib Azmi, Ahmad
Khor, Christopher J. L.
Ho, Khek-Yu
Pittayanon, Rapat
Rerknimitr, Rungsun
Ratanachu-ek, Thawee
Koay, Doreen S. C.
Koh, Jianyi Calvin
Ho, Shiaw-Hooi
Goh, Khean-Lee
Mahadeva, Sanjiv
author_sort Najib Azmi, Ahmad
collection PubMed
description Background and Aims. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) outcomes have traditionally been reported from high volume centers in East Asia. Data from low volume centers in other parts of Asia remain sparse. Methods. A retrospective survey with a structured questionnaire of 5 tertiary centers in 3 countries in South East Asia was conducted. Details of training and clinical outcomes of ESD cases, with follow-up data from these centers, were analyzed. Results. Seven endoscopists from the 5 centers performed a total of 35 cases of ESD in the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGIT) over a 6-year duration. Details of the lesions excised were as follows: median size was 20 mm, morphologically 20 (68.6%) were flat/depressed and 6 (17.1%) were submucosal, and histologically 27 (77.1%) were neoplastic. The median duration of ESD procedures was 105 minutes, with an en-bloc resection rate of 91.4%. There was 1 (2.9%) case of delayed bleeding, but no perforation nor mortality in any of the cases. The recurrence rate after ESD was 5.7%. A prolonged ESD duration was influenced by a larger size of lesion (25 mm, p = 0.02) but not by factors related to the training experience of endoscopists. Conclusions. ESD in the UGIT is feasible and safe in low volume centers in Asia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5116520
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51165202016-11-27 Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes for Gastroesophageal Tumors in Low Volume Units: A Multicenter Survey Najib Azmi, Ahmad Khor, Christopher J. L. Ho, Khek-Yu Pittayanon, Rapat Rerknimitr, Rungsun Ratanachu-ek, Thawee Koay, Doreen S. C. Koh, Jianyi Calvin Ho, Shiaw-Hooi Goh, Khean-Lee Mahadeva, Sanjiv Diagn Ther Endosc Research Article Background and Aims. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) outcomes have traditionally been reported from high volume centers in East Asia. Data from low volume centers in other parts of Asia remain sparse. Methods. A retrospective survey with a structured questionnaire of 5 tertiary centers in 3 countries in South East Asia was conducted. Details of training and clinical outcomes of ESD cases, with follow-up data from these centers, were analyzed. Results. Seven endoscopists from the 5 centers performed a total of 35 cases of ESD in the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGIT) over a 6-year duration. Details of the lesions excised were as follows: median size was 20 mm, morphologically 20 (68.6%) were flat/depressed and 6 (17.1%) were submucosal, and histologically 27 (77.1%) were neoplastic. The median duration of ESD procedures was 105 minutes, with an en-bloc resection rate of 91.4%. There was 1 (2.9%) case of delayed bleeding, but no perforation nor mortality in any of the cases. The recurrence rate after ESD was 5.7%. A prolonged ESD duration was influenced by a larger size of lesion (25 mm, p = 0.02) but not by factors related to the training experience of endoscopists. Conclusions. ESD in the UGIT is feasible and safe in low volume centers in Asia. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5116520/ /pubmed/27891047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5670564 Text en Copyright © 2016 Ahmad Najib Azmi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Najib Azmi, Ahmad
Khor, Christopher J. L.
Ho, Khek-Yu
Pittayanon, Rapat
Rerknimitr, Rungsun
Ratanachu-ek, Thawee
Koay, Doreen S. C.
Koh, Jianyi Calvin
Ho, Shiaw-Hooi
Goh, Khean-Lee
Mahadeva, Sanjiv
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes for Gastroesophageal Tumors in Low Volume Units: A Multicenter Survey
title Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes for Gastroesophageal Tumors in Low Volume Units: A Multicenter Survey
title_full Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes for Gastroesophageal Tumors in Low Volume Units: A Multicenter Survey
title_fullStr Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes for Gastroesophageal Tumors in Low Volume Units: A Multicenter Survey
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes for Gastroesophageal Tumors in Low Volume Units: A Multicenter Survey
title_short Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes for Gastroesophageal Tumors in Low Volume Units: A Multicenter Survey
title_sort endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes for gastroesophageal tumors in low volume units: a multicenter survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116520/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891047
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5670564
work_keys_str_mv AT najibazmiahmad endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey
AT khorchristopherjl endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey
AT hokhekyu endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey
AT pittayanonrapat endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey
AT rerknimitrrungsun endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey
AT ratanachuekthawee endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey
AT koaydoreensc endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey
AT kohjianyicalvin endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey
AT hoshiawhooi endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey
AT gohkheanlee endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey
AT mahadevasanjiv endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey