Cargando…
Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes for Gastroesophageal Tumors in Low Volume Units: A Multicenter Survey
Background and Aims. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) outcomes have traditionally been reported from high volume centers in East Asia. Data from low volume centers in other parts of Asia remain sparse. Methods. A retrospective survey with a structured questionnaire of 5 tertiary centers in 3 c...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5670564 |
_version_ | 1782468673299021824 |
---|---|
author | Najib Azmi, Ahmad Khor, Christopher J. L. Ho, Khek-Yu Pittayanon, Rapat Rerknimitr, Rungsun Ratanachu-ek, Thawee Koay, Doreen S. C. Koh, Jianyi Calvin Ho, Shiaw-Hooi Goh, Khean-Lee Mahadeva, Sanjiv |
author_facet | Najib Azmi, Ahmad Khor, Christopher J. L. Ho, Khek-Yu Pittayanon, Rapat Rerknimitr, Rungsun Ratanachu-ek, Thawee Koay, Doreen S. C. Koh, Jianyi Calvin Ho, Shiaw-Hooi Goh, Khean-Lee Mahadeva, Sanjiv |
author_sort | Najib Azmi, Ahmad |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Aims. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) outcomes have traditionally been reported from high volume centers in East Asia. Data from low volume centers in other parts of Asia remain sparse. Methods. A retrospective survey with a structured questionnaire of 5 tertiary centers in 3 countries in South East Asia was conducted. Details of training and clinical outcomes of ESD cases, with follow-up data from these centers, were analyzed. Results. Seven endoscopists from the 5 centers performed a total of 35 cases of ESD in the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGIT) over a 6-year duration. Details of the lesions excised were as follows: median size was 20 mm, morphologically 20 (68.6%) were flat/depressed and 6 (17.1%) were submucosal, and histologically 27 (77.1%) were neoplastic. The median duration of ESD procedures was 105 minutes, with an en-bloc resection rate of 91.4%. There was 1 (2.9%) case of delayed bleeding, but no perforation nor mortality in any of the cases. The recurrence rate after ESD was 5.7%. A prolonged ESD duration was influenced by a larger size of lesion (25 mm, p = 0.02) but not by factors related to the training experience of endoscopists. Conclusions. ESD in the UGIT is feasible and safe in low volume centers in Asia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5116520 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51165202016-11-27 Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes for Gastroesophageal Tumors in Low Volume Units: A Multicenter Survey Najib Azmi, Ahmad Khor, Christopher J. L. Ho, Khek-Yu Pittayanon, Rapat Rerknimitr, Rungsun Ratanachu-ek, Thawee Koay, Doreen S. C. Koh, Jianyi Calvin Ho, Shiaw-Hooi Goh, Khean-Lee Mahadeva, Sanjiv Diagn Ther Endosc Research Article Background and Aims. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) outcomes have traditionally been reported from high volume centers in East Asia. Data from low volume centers in other parts of Asia remain sparse. Methods. A retrospective survey with a structured questionnaire of 5 tertiary centers in 3 countries in South East Asia was conducted. Details of training and clinical outcomes of ESD cases, with follow-up data from these centers, were analyzed. Results. Seven endoscopists from the 5 centers performed a total of 35 cases of ESD in the upper gastrointestinal tract (UGIT) over a 6-year duration. Details of the lesions excised were as follows: median size was 20 mm, morphologically 20 (68.6%) were flat/depressed and 6 (17.1%) were submucosal, and histologically 27 (77.1%) were neoplastic. The median duration of ESD procedures was 105 minutes, with an en-bloc resection rate of 91.4%. There was 1 (2.9%) case of delayed bleeding, but no perforation nor mortality in any of the cases. The recurrence rate after ESD was 5.7%. A prolonged ESD duration was influenced by a larger size of lesion (25 mm, p = 0.02) but not by factors related to the training experience of endoscopists. Conclusions. ESD in the UGIT is feasible and safe in low volume centers in Asia. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5116520/ /pubmed/27891047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5670564 Text en Copyright © 2016 Ahmad Najib Azmi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Najib Azmi, Ahmad Khor, Christopher J. L. Ho, Khek-Yu Pittayanon, Rapat Rerknimitr, Rungsun Ratanachu-ek, Thawee Koay, Doreen S. C. Koh, Jianyi Calvin Ho, Shiaw-Hooi Goh, Khean-Lee Mahadeva, Sanjiv Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes for Gastroesophageal Tumors in Low Volume Units: A Multicenter Survey |
title | Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes for Gastroesophageal Tumors in Low Volume Units: A Multicenter Survey |
title_full | Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes for Gastroesophageal Tumors in Low Volume Units: A Multicenter Survey |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes for Gastroesophageal Tumors in Low Volume Units: A Multicenter Survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes for Gastroesophageal Tumors in Low Volume Units: A Multicenter Survey |
title_short | Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Outcomes for Gastroesophageal Tumors in Low Volume Units: A Multicenter Survey |
title_sort | endoscopic submucosal dissection outcomes for gastroesophageal tumors in low volume units: a multicenter survey |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116520/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891047 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/5670564 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT najibazmiahmad endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey AT khorchristopherjl endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey AT hokhekyu endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey AT pittayanonrapat endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey AT rerknimitrrungsun endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey AT ratanachuekthawee endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey AT koaydoreensc endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey AT kohjianyicalvin endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey AT hoshiawhooi endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey AT gohkheanlee endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey AT mahadevasanjiv endoscopicsubmucosaldissectionoutcomesforgastroesophagealtumorsinlowvolumeunitsamulticentersurvey |