Cargando…
Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography
Purpose. To compare fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) with and without diabetic macular ischemia (DMI). Methods. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare area meas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3989310 |
_version_ | 1782468673752006656 |
---|---|
author | Garcia, Jose Mauricio Botto de Barros Lima, Talita Toledo Louzada, Ricardo Noguera Rassi, Alessandra Thome Isaac, David Leonardo Cruvinel Avila, Marcos |
author_facet | Garcia, Jose Mauricio Botto de Barros Lima, Talita Toledo Louzada, Ricardo Noguera Rassi, Alessandra Thome Isaac, David Leonardo Cruvinel Avila, Marcos |
author_sort | Garcia, Jose Mauricio Botto de Barros |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose. To compare fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) with and without diabetic macular ischemia (DMI). Methods. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare area measurements and p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. FA and OCTA images were independently graded by 2 observers that reached agreement regarding quantitative DMI according established protocols. The ischemic area was divided into “large” macular ischemia (superior to 0.32 mm(2)) and “small” (inferior to 0.32 mm(2)) groups. Quantitative analyses of the FAZ were performed using custom software. Results. Thirty-four eyes from 34 diabetic patients were enrolled. Subjects with DMI presented a mean area on FA and OCTA of 0.68 ± 0.53 mm(2) and 0.58 ± 0.35 mm(2), respectively (p = 0.1374). Patients without DMI presented a mean area on FA and OCTA of 0.19 ± 0.67 mm(2) and 0.20 ± 0.79 mm(2), respectively (p = 0.9594). The ICC for the FAZ measurements between the 2 observers on FA and OCTA was 0.96 and 0.92, respectively. Conclusion. OCTA represents a novel technique for the diagnosis of DMI and it may become an alternative to FA for this purpose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5116522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51165222016-11-27 Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography Garcia, Jose Mauricio Botto de Barros Lima, Talita Toledo Louzada, Ricardo Noguera Rassi, Alessandra Thome Isaac, David Leonardo Cruvinel Avila, Marcos J Ophthalmol Research Article Purpose. To compare fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) with and without diabetic macular ischemia (DMI). Methods. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare area measurements and p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. FA and OCTA images were independently graded by 2 observers that reached agreement regarding quantitative DMI according established protocols. The ischemic area was divided into “large” macular ischemia (superior to 0.32 mm(2)) and “small” (inferior to 0.32 mm(2)) groups. Quantitative analyses of the FAZ were performed using custom software. Results. Thirty-four eyes from 34 diabetic patients were enrolled. Subjects with DMI presented a mean area on FA and OCTA of 0.68 ± 0.53 mm(2) and 0.58 ± 0.35 mm(2), respectively (p = 0.1374). Patients without DMI presented a mean area on FA and OCTA of 0.19 ± 0.67 mm(2) and 0.20 ± 0.79 mm(2), respectively (p = 0.9594). The ICC for the FAZ measurements between the 2 observers on FA and OCTA was 0.96 and 0.92, respectively. Conclusion. OCTA represents a novel technique for the diagnosis of DMI and it may become an alternative to FA for this purpose. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5116522/ /pubmed/27891250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3989310 Text en Copyright © 2016 Jose Mauricio Botto de Barros Garcia et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Garcia, Jose Mauricio Botto de Barros Lima, Talita Toledo Louzada, Ricardo Noguera Rassi, Alessandra Thome Isaac, David Leonardo Cruvinel Avila, Marcos Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography |
title | Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography |
title_full | Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography |
title_fullStr | Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography |
title_full_unstemmed | Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography |
title_short | Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography |
title_sort | diabetic macular ischemia diagnosis: comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and fluorescein angiography |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3989310 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT garciajosemauriciobottodebarros diabeticmacularischemiadiagnosiscomparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiography AT limatalitatoledo diabeticmacularischemiadiagnosiscomparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiography AT louzadaricardonoguera diabeticmacularischemiadiagnosiscomparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiography AT rassialessandrathome diabeticmacularischemiadiagnosiscomparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiography AT isaacdavidleonardocruvinel diabeticmacularischemiadiagnosiscomparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiography AT avilamarcos diabeticmacularischemiadiagnosiscomparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiography |