Cargando…

Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography

Purpose. To compare fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) with and without diabetic macular ischemia (DMI). Methods. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare area meas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garcia, Jose Mauricio Botto de Barros, Lima, Talita Toledo, Louzada, Ricardo Noguera, Rassi, Alessandra Thome, Isaac, David Leonardo Cruvinel, Avila, Marcos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3989310
_version_ 1782468673752006656
author Garcia, Jose Mauricio Botto de Barros
Lima, Talita Toledo
Louzada, Ricardo Noguera
Rassi, Alessandra Thome
Isaac, David Leonardo Cruvinel
Avila, Marcos
author_facet Garcia, Jose Mauricio Botto de Barros
Lima, Talita Toledo
Louzada, Ricardo Noguera
Rassi, Alessandra Thome
Isaac, David Leonardo Cruvinel
Avila, Marcos
author_sort Garcia, Jose Mauricio Botto de Barros
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To compare fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) with and without diabetic macular ischemia (DMI). Methods. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare area measurements and p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. FA and OCTA images were independently graded by 2 observers that reached agreement regarding quantitative DMI according established protocols. The ischemic area was divided into “large” macular ischemia (superior to 0.32 mm(2)) and “small” (inferior to 0.32 mm(2)) groups. Quantitative analyses of the FAZ were performed using custom software. Results. Thirty-four eyes from 34 diabetic patients were enrolled. Subjects with DMI presented a mean area on FA and OCTA of 0.68 ± 0.53 mm(2) and 0.58 ± 0.35 mm(2), respectively (p = 0.1374). Patients without DMI presented a mean area on FA and OCTA of 0.19 ± 0.67 mm(2) and 0.20 ± 0.79 mm(2), respectively (p = 0.9594). The ICC for the FAZ measurements between the 2 observers on FA and OCTA was 0.96 and 0.92, respectively. Conclusion. OCTA represents a novel technique for the diagnosis of DMI and it may become an alternative to FA for this purpose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5116522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51165222016-11-27 Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography Garcia, Jose Mauricio Botto de Barros Lima, Talita Toledo Louzada, Ricardo Noguera Rassi, Alessandra Thome Isaac, David Leonardo Cruvinel Avila, Marcos J Ophthalmol Research Article Purpose. To compare fluorescein angiography (FA) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images of foveal avascular zone (FAZ) in patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) with and without diabetic macular ischemia (DMI). Methods. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare area measurements and p values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. FA and OCTA images were independently graded by 2 observers that reached agreement regarding quantitative DMI according established protocols. The ischemic area was divided into “large” macular ischemia (superior to 0.32 mm(2)) and “small” (inferior to 0.32 mm(2)) groups. Quantitative analyses of the FAZ were performed using custom software. Results. Thirty-four eyes from 34 diabetic patients were enrolled. Subjects with DMI presented a mean area on FA and OCTA of 0.68 ± 0.53 mm(2) and 0.58 ± 0.35 mm(2), respectively (p = 0.1374). Patients without DMI presented a mean area on FA and OCTA of 0.19 ± 0.67 mm(2) and 0.20 ± 0.79 mm(2), respectively (p = 0.9594). The ICC for the FAZ measurements between the 2 observers on FA and OCTA was 0.96 and 0.92, respectively. Conclusion. OCTA represents a novel technique for the diagnosis of DMI and it may become an alternative to FA for this purpose. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5116522/ /pubmed/27891250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3989310 Text en Copyright © 2016 Jose Mauricio Botto de Barros Garcia et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Garcia, Jose Mauricio Botto de Barros
Lima, Talita Toledo
Louzada, Ricardo Noguera
Rassi, Alessandra Thome
Isaac, David Leonardo Cruvinel
Avila, Marcos
Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography
title Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography
title_full Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography
title_fullStr Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography
title_full_unstemmed Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography
title_short Diabetic Macular Ischemia Diagnosis: Comparison between Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Fluorescein Angiography
title_sort diabetic macular ischemia diagnosis: comparison between optical coherence tomography angiography and fluorescein angiography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/3989310
work_keys_str_mv AT garciajosemauriciobottodebarros diabeticmacularischemiadiagnosiscomparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiography
AT limatalitatoledo diabeticmacularischemiadiagnosiscomparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiography
AT louzadaricardonoguera diabeticmacularischemiadiagnosiscomparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiography
AT rassialessandrathome diabeticmacularischemiadiagnosiscomparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiography
AT isaacdavidleonardocruvinel diabeticmacularischemiadiagnosiscomparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiography
AT avilamarcos diabeticmacularischemiadiagnosiscomparisonbetweenopticalcoherencetomographyangiographyandfluoresceinangiography