Cargando…

A Comparative Study of Assay Performance of Commercial Hepatitis E Virus Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits in Australian Blood Donor Samples

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is transfusion-transmissible and therefore poses a risk to blood transfusion safety. Seroprevalence studies are useful for estimating disease burden and determining risk factors. Considerable variability in the sensitivity of HEV antibody detection assays exists. This study a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shrestha, Ashish C., Flower, Robert L. P., Seed, Clive R., Stramer, Susan L., Faddy, Helen M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9647675
_version_ 1782468675089989632
author Shrestha, Ashish C.
Flower, Robert L. P.
Seed, Clive R.
Stramer, Susan L.
Faddy, Helen M.
author_facet Shrestha, Ashish C.
Flower, Robert L. P.
Seed, Clive R.
Stramer, Susan L.
Faddy, Helen M.
author_sort Shrestha, Ashish C.
collection PubMed
description Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is transfusion-transmissible and therefore poses a risk to blood transfusion safety. Seroprevalence studies are useful for estimating disease burden and determining risk factors. Considerable variability in the sensitivity of HEV antibody detection assays exists. This study aimed to compare the performances of commercially available HEV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) in Australian blood donor samples. Plasma samples that tested positive (n = 194) or negative (n = 200) for HEV IgG (Wantai HEV IgG ELISA) were selected. Of the 194 HEV IgG positive samples, 4 were positive for HEV IgM (Wantai HEV IgM ELISA). All samples were tested with the MP Diagnostics: HEV IgG ELISA, total (IgG, IgM, and IgA) HEV antibody ELISA, and HEV IgM ELISA. Of the 194 Wantai HEV IgG positive samples, 92 (47%) tested positive with the MP Diagnostics HEV IgG ELISA (κ = 0.47) and 126 (65%) with MP Diagnostics total HEV antibody assay (κ = 0.65). There was poor agreement between Wantai and MP Diagnostics HEV IgM assays. This study demonstrated poor agreement between the assays tested. These observations are consistent with previous reports demonstrating significant variability between HEV ELISAs, highlighting that results of HEV serology should be interpreted with caution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5116528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51165282016-11-27 A Comparative Study of Assay Performance of Commercial Hepatitis E Virus Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits in Australian Blood Donor Samples Shrestha, Ashish C. Flower, Robert L. P. Seed, Clive R. Stramer, Susan L. Faddy, Helen M. J Blood Transfus Research Article Hepatitis E virus (HEV) is transfusion-transmissible and therefore poses a risk to blood transfusion safety. Seroprevalence studies are useful for estimating disease burden and determining risk factors. Considerable variability in the sensitivity of HEV antibody detection assays exists. This study aimed to compare the performances of commercially available HEV enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) in Australian blood donor samples. Plasma samples that tested positive (n = 194) or negative (n = 200) for HEV IgG (Wantai HEV IgG ELISA) were selected. Of the 194 HEV IgG positive samples, 4 were positive for HEV IgM (Wantai HEV IgM ELISA). All samples were tested with the MP Diagnostics: HEV IgG ELISA, total (IgG, IgM, and IgA) HEV antibody ELISA, and HEV IgM ELISA. Of the 194 Wantai HEV IgG positive samples, 92 (47%) tested positive with the MP Diagnostics HEV IgG ELISA (κ = 0.47) and 126 (65%) with MP Diagnostics total HEV antibody assay (κ = 0.65). There was poor agreement between Wantai and MP Diagnostics HEV IgM assays. This study demonstrated poor agreement between the assays tested. These observations are consistent with previous reports demonstrating significant variability between HEV ELISAs, highlighting that results of HEV serology should be interpreted with caution. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5116528/ /pubmed/27891290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9647675 Text en Copyright © 2016 Ashish C. Shrestha et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Shrestha, Ashish C.
Flower, Robert L. P.
Seed, Clive R.
Stramer, Susan L.
Faddy, Helen M.
A Comparative Study of Assay Performance of Commercial Hepatitis E Virus Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits in Australian Blood Donor Samples
title A Comparative Study of Assay Performance of Commercial Hepatitis E Virus Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits in Australian Blood Donor Samples
title_full A Comparative Study of Assay Performance of Commercial Hepatitis E Virus Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits in Australian Blood Donor Samples
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Assay Performance of Commercial Hepatitis E Virus Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits in Australian Blood Donor Samples
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Assay Performance of Commercial Hepatitis E Virus Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits in Australian Blood Donor Samples
title_short A Comparative Study of Assay Performance of Commercial Hepatitis E Virus Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Kits in Australian Blood Donor Samples
title_sort comparative study of assay performance of commercial hepatitis e virus enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits in australian blood donor samples
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/9647675
work_keys_str_mv AT shresthaashishc acomparativestudyofassayperformanceofcommercialhepatitisevirusenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaykitsinaustralianblooddonorsamples
AT flowerrobertlp acomparativestudyofassayperformanceofcommercialhepatitisevirusenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaykitsinaustralianblooddonorsamples
AT seedcliver acomparativestudyofassayperformanceofcommercialhepatitisevirusenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaykitsinaustralianblooddonorsamples
AT stramersusanl acomparativestudyofassayperformanceofcommercialhepatitisevirusenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaykitsinaustralianblooddonorsamples
AT faddyhelenm acomparativestudyofassayperformanceofcommercialhepatitisevirusenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaykitsinaustralianblooddonorsamples
AT shresthaashishc comparativestudyofassayperformanceofcommercialhepatitisevirusenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaykitsinaustralianblooddonorsamples
AT flowerrobertlp comparativestudyofassayperformanceofcommercialhepatitisevirusenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaykitsinaustralianblooddonorsamples
AT seedcliver comparativestudyofassayperformanceofcommercialhepatitisevirusenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaykitsinaustralianblooddonorsamples
AT stramersusanl comparativestudyofassayperformanceofcommercialhepatitisevirusenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaykitsinaustralianblooddonorsamples
AT faddyhelenm comparativestudyofassayperformanceofcommercialhepatitisevirusenzymelinkedimmunosorbentassaykitsinaustralianblooddonorsamples