Cargando…

Prosodic Boundaries in Writing: Evidence from a Keystroke Analysis

The aim of the paper is to investigate duration between successive keystrokes during typing in order to examine whether prosodic boundaries are expressed in the process of writing. In particular, we are interested in interkey durations that occur next to punctuation marks (comma and full stops while...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fuchs, Susanne, Krivokapić, Jelena
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27917129
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01678
_version_ 1782468676528635904
author Fuchs, Susanne
Krivokapić, Jelena
author_facet Fuchs, Susanne
Krivokapić, Jelena
author_sort Fuchs, Susanne
collection PubMed
description The aim of the paper is to investigate duration between successive keystrokes during typing in order to examine whether prosodic boundaries are expressed in the process of writing. In particular, we are interested in interkey durations that occur next to punctuation marks (comma and full stops while taking keystrokes between words as a reference), since these punctuation marks are often realized with minor or major prosodic boundaries during overt reading. A two-part experiment was conducted: first, participants’ keystrokes on a computer keyboard were recorded while writing an email to a close friend (in two conditions: with and without time pressure). Second, participants read the email they just wrote. Interkey durations were compared to pause durations at the same locations during read speech. Results provide evidence of significant differences between interkey durations between words, at commas and at full stops (from shortest to longest). These durations were positively correlated with silent pause durations during overt reading. A more detailed analysis of interkey durations revealed patterns that can be interpreted with respect to prosodic boundaries in speech production, namely as phrase-final and phrase-initial lengthening occurring at punctuation marks. This work provides initial evidence that prosodic boundaries are reflected in the writing process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5116534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51165342016-12-02 Prosodic Boundaries in Writing: Evidence from a Keystroke Analysis Fuchs, Susanne Krivokapić, Jelena Front Psychol Psychology The aim of the paper is to investigate duration between successive keystrokes during typing in order to examine whether prosodic boundaries are expressed in the process of writing. In particular, we are interested in interkey durations that occur next to punctuation marks (comma and full stops while taking keystrokes between words as a reference), since these punctuation marks are often realized with minor or major prosodic boundaries during overt reading. A two-part experiment was conducted: first, participants’ keystrokes on a computer keyboard were recorded while writing an email to a close friend (in two conditions: with and without time pressure). Second, participants read the email they just wrote. Interkey durations were compared to pause durations at the same locations during read speech. Results provide evidence of significant differences between interkey durations between words, at commas and at full stops (from shortest to longest). These durations were positively correlated with silent pause durations during overt reading. A more detailed analysis of interkey durations revealed patterns that can be interpreted with respect to prosodic boundaries in speech production, namely as phrase-final and phrase-initial lengthening occurring at punctuation marks. This work provides initial evidence that prosodic boundaries are reflected in the writing process. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5116534/ /pubmed/27917129 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01678 Text en Copyright © 2016 Fuchs and Krivokapić. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Fuchs, Susanne
Krivokapić, Jelena
Prosodic Boundaries in Writing: Evidence from a Keystroke Analysis
title Prosodic Boundaries in Writing: Evidence from a Keystroke Analysis
title_full Prosodic Boundaries in Writing: Evidence from a Keystroke Analysis
title_fullStr Prosodic Boundaries in Writing: Evidence from a Keystroke Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prosodic Boundaries in Writing: Evidence from a Keystroke Analysis
title_short Prosodic Boundaries in Writing: Evidence from a Keystroke Analysis
title_sort prosodic boundaries in writing: evidence from a keystroke analysis
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27917129
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01678
work_keys_str_mv AT fuchssusanne prosodicboundariesinwritingevidencefromakeystrokeanalysis
AT krivokapicjelena prosodicboundariesinwritingevidencefromakeystrokeanalysis