Cargando…

A Comparative Nitrogen Balance and Productivity Analysis of Legume and Non-legume Supported Cropping Systems: The Potential Role of Biological Nitrogen Fixation

The potential of biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) to provide sufficient N for production has encouraged re-appraisal of cropping systems that deploy legumes. It has been argued that legume-derived N can maintain productivity as an alternative to the application of mineral fertilizer, although few...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iannetta, Pietro P. M., Young, Mark, Bachinger, Johann, Bergkvist, Göran, Doltra, Jordi, Lopez-Bellido, Rafael J., Monti, Michele, Pappa, Valentini A., Reckling, Moritz, Topp, Cairistiona F. E., Walker, Robin L., Rees, Robert M., Watson, Christine A., James, Euan K., Squire, Geoffrey R., Begg, Graham S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27917178
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01700
_version_ 1782468682782343168
author Iannetta, Pietro P. M.
Young, Mark
Bachinger, Johann
Bergkvist, Göran
Doltra, Jordi
Lopez-Bellido, Rafael J.
Monti, Michele
Pappa, Valentini A.
Reckling, Moritz
Topp, Cairistiona F. E.
Walker, Robin L.
Rees, Robert M.
Watson, Christine A.
James, Euan K.
Squire, Geoffrey R.
Begg, Graham S.
author_facet Iannetta, Pietro P. M.
Young, Mark
Bachinger, Johann
Bergkvist, Göran
Doltra, Jordi
Lopez-Bellido, Rafael J.
Monti, Michele
Pappa, Valentini A.
Reckling, Moritz
Topp, Cairistiona F. E.
Walker, Robin L.
Rees, Robert M.
Watson, Christine A.
James, Euan K.
Squire, Geoffrey R.
Begg, Graham S.
author_sort Iannetta, Pietro P. M.
collection PubMed
description The potential of biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) to provide sufficient N for production has encouraged re-appraisal of cropping systems that deploy legumes. It has been argued that legume-derived N can maintain productivity as an alternative to the application of mineral fertilizer, although few studies have systematically evaluated the effect of optimizing the balance between legumes and non N-fixing crops to optimize production. In addition, the shortage, or even absence in some regions, of measurements of BNF in crops and forages severely limits the ability to design and evaluate new legume–based agroecosystems. To provide an indication of the magnitude of BNF in European agriculture, a soil-surface N-balance approach was applied to historical data from 8 experimental cropping systems that compared legume and non-legume crop types (e.g., grains, forages and intercrops) across pedoclimatic regions of Europe. Mean BNF for different legume types ranged from 32 to 115 kg ha(−1) annually. Output in terms of total biomass (grain, forage, etc.) was 30% greater in non-legumes, which used N to produce dry matter more efficiently than legumes, whereas output of N was greater from legumes. When examined over the crop sequence, the contribution of BNF to the N-balance increased to reach a maximum when the legume fraction was around 0.5 (legume crops were present in half the years). BNF was lower when the legume fraction increased to 0.6–0.8, not because of any feature of the legume, but because the cropping systems in this range were dominated by mixtures of legume and non-legume forages to which inorganic N as fertilizer was normally applied. Forage (e.g., grass and clover), as opposed to grain crops in this range maintained high outputs of biomass and N. In conclusion, BNF through grain and forage legumes has the potential to generate major benefit in terms of reducing or dispensing with the need for mineral N without loss of total output.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5116563
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51165632016-12-02 A Comparative Nitrogen Balance and Productivity Analysis of Legume and Non-legume Supported Cropping Systems: The Potential Role of Biological Nitrogen Fixation Iannetta, Pietro P. M. Young, Mark Bachinger, Johann Bergkvist, Göran Doltra, Jordi Lopez-Bellido, Rafael J. Monti, Michele Pappa, Valentini A. Reckling, Moritz Topp, Cairistiona F. E. Walker, Robin L. Rees, Robert M. Watson, Christine A. James, Euan K. Squire, Geoffrey R. Begg, Graham S. Front Plant Sci Plant Science The potential of biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) to provide sufficient N for production has encouraged re-appraisal of cropping systems that deploy legumes. It has been argued that legume-derived N can maintain productivity as an alternative to the application of mineral fertilizer, although few studies have systematically evaluated the effect of optimizing the balance between legumes and non N-fixing crops to optimize production. In addition, the shortage, or even absence in some regions, of measurements of BNF in crops and forages severely limits the ability to design and evaluate new legume–based agroecosystems. To provide an indication of the magnitude of BNF in European agriculture, a soil-surface N-balance approach was applied to historical data from 8 experimental cropping systems that compared legume and non-legume crop types (e.g., grains, forages and intercrops) across pedoclimatic regions of Europe. Mean BNF for different legume types ranged from 32 to 115 kg ha(−1) annually. Output in terms of total biomass (grain, forage, etc.) was 30% greater in non-legumes, which used N to produce dry matter more efficiently than legumes, whereas output of N was greater from legumes. When examined over the crop sequence, the contribution of BNF to the N-balance increased to reach a maximum when the legume fraction was around 0.5 (legume crops were present in half the years). BNF was lower when the legume fraction increased to 0.6–0.8, not because of any feature of the legume, but because the cropping systems in this range were dominated by mixtures of legume and non-legume forages to which inorganic N as fertilizer was normally applied. Forage (e.g., grass and clover), as opposed to grain crops in this range maintained high outputs of biomass and N. In conclusion, BNF through grain and forage legumes has the potential to generate major benefit in terms of reducing or dispensing with the need for mineral N without loss of total output. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5116563/ /pubmed/27917178 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01700 Text en Copyright © 2016 Iannetta, Young, Bachinger, Bergkvist, Doltra, Lopez-Bellido, Monti, Pappa, Reckling, Topp, Walker, Rees, Watson, James, Squire and Begg. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Iannetta, Pietro P. M.
Young, Mark
Bachinger, Johann
Bergkvist, Göran
Doltra, Jordi
Lopez-Bellido, Rafael J.
Monti, Michele
Pappa, Valentini A.
Reckling, Moritz
Topp, Cairistiona F. E.
Walker, Robin L.
Rees, Robert M.
Watson, Christine A.
James, Euan K.
Squire, Geoffrey R.
Begg, Graham S.
A Comparative Nitrogen Balance and Productivity Analysis of Legume and Non-legume Supported Cropping Systems: The Potential Role of Biological Nitrogen Fixation
title A Comparative Nitrogen Balance and Productivity Analysis of Legume and Non-legume Supported Cropping Systems: The Potential Role of Biological Nitrogen Fixation
title_full A Comparative Nitrogen Balance and Productivity Analysis of Legume and Non-legume Supported Cropping Systems: The Potential Role of Biological Nitrogen Fixation
title_fullStr A Comparative Nitrogen Balance and Productivity Analysis of Legume and Non-legume Supported Cropping Systems: The Potential Role of Biological Nitrogen Fixation
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Nitrogen Balance and Productivity Analysis of Legume and Non-legume Supported Cropping Systems: The Potential Role of Biological Nitrogen Fixation
title_short A Comparative Nitrogen Balance and Productivity Analysis of Legume and Non-legume Supported Cropping Systems: The Potential Role of Biological Nitrogen Fixation
title_sort comparative nitrogen balance and productivity analysis of legume and non-legume supported cropping systems: the potential role of biological nitrogen fixation
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116563/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27917178
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01700
work_keys_str_mv AT iannettapietropm acomparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT youngmark acomparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT bachingerjohann acomparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT bergkvistgoran acomparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT doltrajordi acomparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT lopezbellidorafaelj acomparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT montimichele acomparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT pappavalentinia acomparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT recklingmoritz acomparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT toppcairistionafe acomparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT walkerrobinl acomparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT reesrobertm acomparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT watsonchristinea acomparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT jameseuank acomparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT squiregeoffreyr acomparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT begggrahams acomparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT iannettapietropm comparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT youngmark comparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT bachingerjohann comparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT bergkvistgoran comparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT doltrajordi comparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT lopezbellidorafaelj comparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT montimichele comparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT pappavalentinia comparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT recklingmoritz comparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT toppcairistionafe comparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT walkerrobinl comparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT reesrobertm comparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT watsonchristinea comparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT jameseuank comparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT squiregeoffreyr comparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation
AT begggrahams comparativenitrogenbalanceandproductivityanalysisoflegumeandnonlegumesupportedcroppingsystemsthepotentialroleofbiologicalnitrogenfixation