Cargando…

Impact of frailty on approach to colonic resection: Laparoscopy vs open surgery

AIM: To understand the influence of frailty on postoperative outcomes for laparoscopic and open colectomy. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005-2012) for patients undergoing colon resection [open colectomy (OC) and laparoscopic colectomy (LC)]. Pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mosquera, Catalina, Spaniolas, Konstantinos, Fitzgerald, Timothy L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27920475
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9544
_version_ 1782468690000740352
author Mosquera, Catalina
Spaniolas, Konstantinos
Fitzgerald, Timothy L
author_facet Mosquera, Catalina
Spaniolas, Konstantinos
Fitzgerald, Timothy L
author_sort Mosquera, Catalina
collection PubMed
description AIM: To understand the influence of frailty on postoperative outcomes for laparoscopic and open colectomy. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005-2012) for patients undergoing colon resection [open colectomy (OC) and laparoscopic colectomy (LC)]. Patients were classified as non-frail (0 points), low frailty (1 point), moderate frailty (2 points), and severe frailty (≥ 3) using the Modified Frailty Index. 30-d mortality and complications were used as the primary end point and analyzed for the overall population. Complications were grouped into major and minor. Subset analysis was performed for patients undergoing colectomy (total colectomy, partial colectomy and sigmoid colectomy) and separately for patients undergoing rectal surgery (abdominoperineal resection, low anterior resection, and proctocolectomy). We analyzed the data using SAS Platform JMP Pro version 10.0.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, United States). RESULTS: A total of 94811 patients were identified; the majority underwent OC (58.7%), were white (76.9%), and non-frail (44.8%). The median age was 61.3 years. Prolonged length of stay (LOS) occurred in 4.7%, and 30-d mortality was 2.28%. Patients undergoing OC were older (61.89 ± 15.31 vs 60.55 ± 14.93) and had a higher ASA score (48.3% ASA3 vs 57.7% ASA2 in the LC group) (P < 0.0001). Most patients were non-frail (42.5% OC vs 48% LC, P < 0.0001). Complications, prolonged LOS, and mortality were significantly more common in patients undergoing OC (P < 0.0001). OC had a higher risk of death and complications compared to LC for all frailty scores (non-frail: OR = 4.7, and OR = 4.67; mildly frail: OR = 2.51, and OR = 2.47; moderately frail: OR = 2.94, and OR = 2.02, severely frail: OR = 2.37, and OR = 2.34, P < 0.05) and an increase in absolute mortality with increasing frailty (non-frail 0.68% OC, mildly frail 1.39%, moderately frail 3.44%, and severely frail 5.83%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: LC is associated with improved outcomes. Although the odds of mortality are higher in non-frail, there is a progressive increase in mortality with increasing frailty.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5116598
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51165982016-12-05 Impact of frailty on approach to colonic resection: Laparoscopy vs open surgery Mosquera, Catalina Spaniolas, Konstantinos Fitzgerald, Timothy L World J Gastroenterol Retrospective Study AIM: To understand the influence of frailty on postoperative outcomes for laparoscopic and open colectomy. METHODS: Data were obtained from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005-2012) for patients undergoing colon resection [open colectomy (OC) and laparoscopic colectomy (LC)]. Patients were classified as non-frail (0 points), low frailty (1 point), moderate frailty (2 points), and severe frailty (≥ 3) using the Modified Frailty Index. 30-d mortality and complications were used as the primary end point and analyzed for the overall population. Complications were grouped into major and minor. Subset analysis was performed for patients undergoing colectomy (total colectomy, partial colectomy and sigmoid colectomy) and separately for patients undergoing rectal surgery (abdominoperineal resection, low anterior resection, and proctocolectomy). We analyzed the data using SAS Platform JMP Pro version 10.0.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, United States). RESULTS: A total of 94811 patients were identified; the majority underwent OC (58.7%), were white (76.9%), and non-frail (44.8%). The median age was 61.3 years. Prolonged length of stay (LOS) occurred in 4.7%, and 30-d mortality was 2.28%. Patients undergoing OC were older (61.89 ± 15.31 vs 60.55 ± 14.93) and had a higher ASA score (48.3% ASA3 vs 57.7% ASA2 in the LC group) (P < 0.0001). Most patients were non-frail (42.5% OC vs 48% LC, P < 0.0001). Complications, prolonged LOS, and mortality were significantly more common in patients undergoing OC (P < 0.0001). OC had a higher risk of death and complications compared to LC for all frailty scores (non-frail: OR = 4.7, and OR = 4.67; mildly frail: OR = 2.51, and OR = 2.47; moderately frail: OR = 2.94, and OR = 2.02, severely frail: OR = 2.37, and OR = 2.34, P < 0.05) and an increase in absolute mortality with increasing frailty (non-frail 0.68% OC, mildly frail 1.39%, moderately frail 3.44%, and severely frail 5.83%, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: LC is associated with improved outcomes. Although the odds of mortality are higher in non-frail, there is a progressive increase in mortality with increasing frailty. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2016-11-21 2016-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5116598/ /pubmed/27920475 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9544 Text en ©The Author(s) 2016. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Mosquera, Catalina
Spaniolas, Konstantinos
Fitzgerald, Timothy L
Impact of frailty on approach to colonic resection: Laparoscopy vs open surgery
title Impact of frailty on approach to colonic resection: Laparoscopy vs open surgery
title_full Impact of frailty on approach to colonic resection: Laparoscopy vs open surgery
title_fullStr Impact of frailty on approach to colonic resection: Laparoscopy vs open surgery
title_full_unstemmed Impact of frailty on approach to colonic resection: Laparoscopy vs open surgery
title_short Impact of frailty on approach to colonic resection: Laparoscopy vs open surgery
title_sort impact of frailty on approach to colonic resection: laparoscopy vs open surgery
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116598/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27920475
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v22.i43.9544
work_keys_str_mv AT mosqueracatalina impactoffrailtyonapproachtocolonicresectionlaparoscopyvsopensurgery
AT spaniolaskonstantinos impactoffrailtyonapproachtocolonicresectionlaparoscopyvsopensurgery
AT fitzgeraldtimothyl impactoffrailtyonapproachtocolonicresectionlaparoscopyvsopensurgery