Cargando…

The importance of tissue confirmation of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer: lesson from a brain metastasis case

BACKGROUND: The discrepancy of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) statuses in breast cancers has been reported. Available systemic therapy for patients with breast cancer is based on the molecular subtypes as identified by IHC and/...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ding, Jingxian, Hu, Pinghua, Chen, Jun, Wu, Xiaobo, Cao, Yali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28050577
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncoscience.320
_version_ 1782468734762352640
author Ding, Jingxian
Hu, Pinghua
Chen, Jun
Wu, Xiaobo
Cao, Yali
author_facet Ding, Jingxian
Hu, Pinghua
Chen, Jun
Wu, Xiaobo
Cao, Yali
author_sort Ding, Jingxian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The discrepancy of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) statuses in breast cancers has been reported. Available systemic therapy for patients with breast cancer is based on the molecular subtypes as identified by IHC and/or FISH. However, these biomarkers may change throughout tumor progression. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a relatively uncommon case of a 39-year-old Chinese woman with local advanced breast cancer (LABC) treated with 6 cycles of docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) regimen neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and subsequently mastectomy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and tamoxifen followed as regularly. Brain metastatic event appeared in 6 months after mastectomy. Treatment for brain metastasis was surgical resection and followed by whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) approved by multidisciplinary team (MDT). Initial pathological diagnosis was IDC, cT4N1M0, luminal B (ER+ 90%, PR+90%, HER2 0, Ki67+ 70%) based on ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. Surgical pathology revealed IDC, pT2N3M0 luminal B (ER+ 20%, PR+20%, HER2 0, Ki67+ 20%). Histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is grade 3 according to the Miller/Payne grading system. Final pathology of brain metastasis showed a HER2 overexpression metastatic breast cancer luminal B (ER+ 70%, PR+ 70%, HER2 2+, Ki67+ 30%), FISH confirmed HER2 overexpression. Weekly paclitaxel plus trastuzumab was given for 12 weeks, then trastuzumab every 3 weeks for a whole year. Patient follow-up is still ongoing, no new events appear yet. CONCLUSIONS: The determination of hormone receptors and HER2 status should be routinely performed in all involved tissues, if possible, and systemic therapy should be tailored following the latest finding.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5116944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51169442017-01-03 The importance of tissue confirmation of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer: lesson from a brain metastasis case Ding, Jingxian Hu, Pinghua Chen, Jun Wu, Xiaobo Cao, Yali Oncoscience Case Report BACKGROUND: The discrepancy of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) statuses in breast cancers has been reported. Available systemic therapy for patients with breast cancer is based on the molecular subtypes as identified by IHC and/or FISH. However, these biomarkers may change throughout tumor progression. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a relatively uncommon case of a 39-year-old Chinese woman with local advanced breast cancer (LABC) treated with 6 cycles of docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (TAC) regimen neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and subsequently mastectomy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and tamoxifen followed as regularly. Brain metastatic event appeared in 6 months after mastectomy. Treatment for brain metastasis was surgical resection and followed by whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) approved by multidisciplinary team (MDT). Initial pathological diagnosis was IDC, cT4N1M0, luminal B (ER+ 90%, PR+90%, HER2 0, Ki67+ 70%) based on ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy. Surgical pathology revealed IDC, pT2N3M0 luminal B (ER+ 20%, PR+20%, HER2 0, Ki67+ 20%). Histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy is grade 3 according to the Miller/Payne grading system. Final pathology of brain metastasis showed a HER2 overexpression metastatic breast cancer luminal B (ER+ 70%, PR+ 70%, HER2 2+, Ki67+ 30%), FISH confirmed HER2 overexpression. Weekly paclitaxel plus trastuzumab was given for 12 weeks, then trastuzumab every 3 weeks for a whole year. Patient follow-up is still ongoing, no new events appear yet. CONCLUSIONS: The determination of hormone receptors and HER2 status should be routinely performed in all involved tissues, if possible, and systemic therapy should be tailored following the latest finding. Impact Journals LLC 2016-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5116944/ /pubmed/28050577 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncoscience.320 Text en Copyright: © 2016 Ding et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Case Report
Ding, Jingxian
Hu, Pinghua
Chen, Jun
Wu, Xiaobo
Cao, Yali
The importance of tissue confirmation of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer: lesson from a brain metastasis case
title The importance of tissue confirmation of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer: lesson from a brain metastasis case
title_full The importance of tissue confirmation of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer: lesson from a brain metastasis case
title_fullStr The importance of tissue confirmation of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer: lesson from a brain metastasis case
title_full_unstemmed The importance of tissue confirmation of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer: lesson from a brain metastasis case
title_short The importance of tissue confirmation of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer: lesson from a brain metastasis case
title_sort importance of tissue confirmation of metastatic disease in patients with breast cancer: lesson from a brain metastasis case
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5116944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28050577
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncoscience.320
work_keys_str_mv AT dingjingxian theimportanceoftissueconfirmationofmetastaticdiseaseinpatientswithbreastcancerlessonfromabrainmetastasiscase
AT hupinghua theimportanceoftissueconfirmationofmetastaticdiseaseinpatientswithbreastcancerlessonfromabrainmetastasiscase
AT chenjun theimportanceoftissueconfirmationofmetastaticdiseaseinpatientswithbreastcancerlessonfromabrainmetastasiscase
AT wuxiaobo theimportanceoftissueconfirmationofmetastaticdiseaseinpatientswithbreastcancerlessonfromabrainmetastasiscase
AT caoyali theimportanceoftissueconfirmationofmetastaticdiseaseinpatientswithbreastcancerlessonfromabrainmetastasiscase
AT dingjingxian importanceoftissueconfirmationofmetastaticdiseaseinpatientswithbreastcancerlessonfromabrainmetastasiscase
AT hupinghua importanceoftissueconfirmationofmetastaticdiseaseinpatientswithbreastcancerlessonfromabrainmetastasiscase
AT chenjun importanceoftissueconfirmationofmetastaticdiseaseinpatientswithbreastcancerlessonfromabrainmetastasiscase
AT wuxiaobo importanceoftissueconfirmationofmetastaticdiseaseinpatientswithbreastcancerlessonfromabrainmetastasiscase
AT caoyali importanceoftissueconfirmationofmetastaticdiseaseinpatientswithbreastcancerlessonfromabrainmetastasiscase