Cargando…

The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surface electromyography (sEMG) is a commonly used technique to investigate muscle activation and fatigue, which is non-invasive and can allow for continuous measurement. Systematic research on the use of sEMG in the sporting environment has been on-going for many years and predomin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Subbu, R, Weiler, R, Whyte, G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27900124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000026
_version_ 1782468746163519488
author Subbu, R
Weiler, R
Whyte, G
author_facet Subbu, R
Weiler, R
Whyte, G
author_sort Subbu, R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surface electromyography (sEMG) is a commonly used technique to investigate muscle activation and fatigue, which is non-invasive and can allow for continuous measurement. Systematic research on the use of sEMG in the sporting environment has been on-going for many years and predominantly based on cycling and rowing activities. To date there have been no reviews assessing the validity and reliability in sEMG exclusively in running activities specifically during on-field testing. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the use of sEMG in the practical context and whether this be translated to on-field testing. METHODS: Electronic literature searches were performed using the Cochrane Library, PUBMED, CINAHL and PeDro without restrictions on the study date to identify the relevant current English language literature. RESULTS: 10 studies were relevant after title and content review. All the studies identified were all level three evidence based. The general trends of the sEMG activity appear to correlate with running velocity and muscle fatigue seems almost always the consequence of prolonged, dynamic activity. However, these changes are not consistently measured or statistically significant throughout the studies raising the question of the accuracy and reliability when analysing sEMG measurements and making assumptions about the cause of fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: An agreed consensus when measuring and analysing sEMG data during running activities particularly in field testing with the most appropriate study design and reliable methodology is yet to be determined and further studies are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5117013
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51170132016-11-29 The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review Subbu, R Weiler, R Whyte, G BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Research BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surface electromyography (sEMG) is a commonly used technique to investigate muscle activation and fatigue, which is non-invasive and can allow for continuous measurement. Systematic research on the use of sEMG in the sporting environment has been on-going for many years and predominantly based on cycling and rowing activities. To date there have been no reviews assessing the validity and reliability in sEMG exclusively in running activities specifically during on-field testing. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the use of sEMG in the practical context and whether this be translated to on-field testing. METHODS: Electronic literature searches were performed using the Cochrane Library, PUBMED, CINAHL and PeDro without restrictions on the study date to identify the relevant current English language literature. RESULTS: 10 studies were relevant after title and content review. All the studies identified were all level three evidence based. The general trends of the sEMG activity appear to correlate with running velocity and muscle fatigue seems almost always the consequence of prolonged, dynamic activity. However, these changes are not consistently measured or statistically significant throughout the studies raising the question of the accuracy and reliability when analysing sEMG measurements and making assumptions about the cause of fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: An agreed consensus when measuring and analysing sEMG data during running activities particularly in field testing with the most appropriate study design and reliable methodology is yet to be determined and further studies are required. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5117013/ /pubmed/27900124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000026 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Subbu, R
Weiler, R
Whyte, G
The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review
title The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review
title_full The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review
title_fullStr The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review
title_full_unstemmed The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review
title_short The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review
title_sort practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? a narrative review
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117013/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27900124
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000026
work_keys_str_mv AT subbur thepracticaluseofsurfaceelectromyographyduringrunningdoestheevidencesupportthehypeanarrativereview
AT weilerr thepracticaluseofsurfaceelectromyographyduringrunningdoestheevidencesupportthehypeanarrativereview
AT whyteg thepracticaluseofsurfaceelectromyographyduringrunningdoestheevidencesupportthehypeanarrativereview
AT subbur practicaluseofsurfaceelectromyographyduringrunningdoestheevidencesupportthehypeanarrativereview
AT weilerr practicaluseofsurfaceelectromyographyduringrunningdoestheevidencesupportthehypeanarrativereview
AT whyteg practicaluseofsurfaceelectromyographyduringrunningdoestheevidencesupportthehypeanarrativereview