Cargando…
The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surface electromyography (sEMG) is a commonly used technique to investigate muscle activation and fatigue, which is non-invasive and can allow for continuous measurement. Systematic research on the use of sEMG in the sporting environment has been on-going for many years and predomin...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27900124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000026 |
_version_ | 1782468746163519488 |
---|---|
author | Subbu, R Weiler, R Whyte, G |
author_facet | Subbu, R Weiler, R Whyte, G |
author_sort | Subbu, R |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surface electromyography (sEMG) is a commonly used technique to investigate muscle activation and fatigue, which is non-invasive and can allow for continuous measurement. Systematic research on the use of sEMG in the sporting environment has been on-going for many years and predominantly based on cycling and rowing activities. To date there have been no reviews assessing the validity and reliability in sEMG exclusively in running activities specifically during on-field testing. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the use of sEMG in the practical context and whether this be translated to on-field testing. METHODS: Electronic literature searches were performed using the Cochrane Library, PUBMED, CINAHL and PeDro without restrictions on the study date to identify the relevant current English language literature. RESULTS: 10 studies were relevant after title and content review. All the studies identified were all level three evidence based. The general trends of the sEMG activity appear to correlate with running velocity and muscle fatigue seems almost always the consequence of prolonged, dynamic activity. However, these changes are not consistently measured or statistically significant throughout the studies raising the question of the accuracy and reliability when analysing sEMG measurements and making assumptions about the cause of fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: An agreed consensus when measuring and analysing sEMG data during running activities particularly in field testing with the most appropriate study design and reliable methodology is yet to be determined and further studies are required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5117013 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51170132016-11-29 The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review Subbu, R Weiler, R Whyte, G BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Research BACKGROUND/AIMS: Surface electromyography (sEMG) is a commonly used technique to investigate muscle activation and fatigue, which is non-invasive and can allow for continuous measurement. Systematic research on the use of sEMG in the sporting environment has been on-going for many years and predominantly based on cycling and rowing activities. To date there have been no reviews assessing the validity and reliability in sEMG exclusively in running activities specifically during on-field testing. The purpose of this review is to evaluate the use of sEMG in the practical context and whether this be translated to on-field testing. METHODS: Electronic literature searches were performed using the Cochrane Library, PUBMED, CINAHL and PeDro without restrictions on the study date to identify the relevant current English language literature. RESULTS: 10 studies were relevant after title and content review. All the studies identified were all level three evidence based. The general trends of the sEMG activity appear to correlate with running velocity and muscle fatigue seems almost always the consequence of prolonged, dynamic activity. However, these changes are not consistently measured or statistically significant throughout the studies raising the question of the accuracy and reliability when analysing sEMG measurements and making assumptions about the cause of fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: An agreed consensus when measuring and analysing sEMG data during running activities particularly in field testing with the most appropriate study design and reliable methodology is yet to be determined and further studies are required. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5117013/ /pubmed/27900124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000026 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Subbu, R Weiler, R Whyte, G The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review |
title | The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review |
title_full | The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review |
title_fullStr | The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review |
title_full_unstemmed | The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review |
title_short | The practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? A narrative review |
title_sort | practical use of surface electromyography during running: does the evidence support the hype? a narrative review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117013/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27900124 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT subbur thepracticaluseofsurfaceelectromyographyduringrunningdoestheevidencesupportthehypeanarrativereview AT weilerr thepracticaluseofsurfaceelectromyographyduringrunningdoestheevidencesupportthehypeanarrativereview AT whyteg thepracticaluseofsurfaceelectromyographyduringrunningdoestheevidencesupportthehypeanarrativereview AT subbur practicaluseofsurfaceelectromyographyduringrunningdoestheevidencesupportthehypeanarrativereview AT weilerr practicaluseofsurfaceelectromyographyduringrunningdoestheevidencesupportthehypeanarrativereview AT whyteg practicaluseofsurfaceelectromyographyduringrunningdoestheevidencesupportthehypeanarrativereview |