Cargando…

Does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics?

BACKGROUND: Scrummaging is unique to rugby union and involves 2 ‘packs’ of 8 players competing to regain ball possession. Intending to serve as a quick and safe method to restart the game, injury prevalence during scrummaging necessitates further evaluation of this environment. AIMS: The aim of this...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Swaminathan, Ramesh, Williams, Jonathan M, Jones, Michael D, Theobald, Peter S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27900153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000064
_version_ 1782468750032764928
author Swaminathan, Ramesh
Williams, Jonathan M
Jones, Michael D
Theobald, Peter S
author_facet Swaminathan, Ramesh
Williams, Jonathan M
Jones, Michael D
Theobald, Peter S
author_sort Swaminathan, Ramesh
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Scrummaging is unique to rugby union and involves 2 ‘packs’ of 8 players competing to regain ball possession. Intending to serve as a quick and safe method to restart the game, injury prevalence during scrummaging necessitates further evaluation of this environment. AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of scrummage engagement sequences on spinal kinematics of the hooker. The conditions investigated were: (1) live competitive scrummaging using the new ‘crouch, bind, set’ sequence; (2) live competitive scrummaging using the old ‘crouch touch pause engage’ sequence and (3) training scrummaging using a scrum machine. METHODS: Inertial sensors provided three-dimensional kinematic data across 5 spinal regions. Participants (n=29) were adult, male community club and university-level hookers. RESULTS: Engagement sequence had no effect on resultant kinematics of any spinal region. Machine scrummaging resulted in lesser magnitudes of motion in the upper spinal regions. Around two-thirds of the total available cervical motion was utilised during live scrummaging. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the most recent laws do not influence the spinal kinematics of the hooker during live scrummaging; however, there may be other benefits from these law changes that fall outside the scope of this investigation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5117027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51170272016-11-29 Does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics? Swaminathan, Ramesh Williams, Jonathan M Jones, Michael D Theobald, Peter S BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Research BACKGROUND: Scrummaging is unique to rugby union and involves 2 ‘packs’ of 8 players competing to regain ball possession. Intending to serve as a quick and safe method to restart the game, injury prevalence during scrummaging necessitates further evaluation of this environment. AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of scrummage engagement sequences on spinal kinematics of the hooker. The conditions investigated were: (1) live competitive scrummaging using the new ‘crouch, bind, set’ sequence; (2) live competitive scrummaging using the old ‘crouch touch pause engage’ sequence and (3) training scrummaging using a scrum machine. METHODS: Inertial sensors provided three-dimensional kinematic data across 5 spinal regions. Participants (n=29) were adult, male community club and university-level hookers. RESULTS: Engagement sequence had no effect on resultant kinematics of any spinal region. Machine scrummaging resulted in lesser magnitudes of motion in the upper spinal regions. Around two-thirds of the total available cervical motion was utilised during live scrummaging. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the most recent laws do not influence the spinal kinematics of the hooker during live scrummaging; however, there may be other benefits from these law changes that fall outside the scope of this investigation. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5117027/ /pubmed/27900153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000064 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Swaminathan, Ramesh
Williams, Jonathan M
Jones, Michael D
Theobald, Peter S
Does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics?
title Does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics?
title_full Does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics?
title_fullStr Does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics?
title_full_unstemmed Does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics?
title_short Does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics?
title_sort does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27900153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000064
work_keys_str_mv AT swaminathanramesh doesthenewrugbyunionscrumsequencepositivelyinfluencethehookersinsituspinalkinematics
AT williamsjonathanm doesthenewrugbyunionscrumsequencepositivelyinfluencethehookersinsituspinalkinematics
AT jonesmichaeld doesthenewrugbyunionscrumsequencepositivelyinfluencethehookersinsituspinalkinematics
AT theobaldpeters doesthenewrugbyunionscrumsequencepositivelyinfluencethehookersinsituspinalkinematics