Cargando…
Does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics?
BACKGROUND: Scrummaging is unique to rugby union and involves 2 ‘packs’ of 8 players competing to regain ball possession. Intending to serve as a quick and safe method to restart the game, injury prevalence during scrummaging necessitates further evaluation of this environment. AIMS: The aim of this...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27900153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000064 |
_version_ | 1782468750032764928 |
---|---|
author | Swaminathan, Ramesh Williams, Jonathan M Jones, Michael D Theobald, Peter S |
author_facet | Swaminathan, Ramesh Williams, Jonathan M Jones, Michael D Theobald, Peter S |
author_sort | Swaminathan, Ramesh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Scrummaging is unique to rugby union and involves 2 ‘packs’ of 8 players competing to regain ball possession. Intending to serve as a quick and safe method to restart the game, injury prevalence during scrummaging necessitates further evaluation of this environment. AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of scrummage engagement sequences on spinal kinematics of the hooker. The conditions investigated were: (1) live competitive scrummaging using the new ‘crouch, bind, set’ sequence; (2) live competitive scrummaging using the old ‘crouch touch pause engage’ sequence and (3) training scrummaging using a scrum machine. METHODS: Inertial sensors provided three-dimensional kinematic data across 5 spinal regions. Participants (n=29) were adult, male community club and university-level hookers. RESULTS: Engagement sequence had no effect on resultant kinematics of any spinal region. Machine scrummaging resulted in lesser magnitudes of motion in the upper spinal regions. Around two-thirds of the total available cervical motion was utilised during live scrummaging. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the most recent laws do not influence the spinal kinematics of the hooker during live scrummaging; however, there may be other benefits from these law changes that fall outside the scope of this investigation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5117027 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51170272016-11-29 Does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics? Swaminathan, Ramesh Williams, Jonathan M Jones, Michael D Theobald, Peter S BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Research BACKGROUND: Scrummaging is unique to rugby union and involves 2 ‘packs’ of 8 players competing to regain ball possession. Intending to serve as a quick and safe method to restart the game, injury prevalence during scrummaging necessitates further evaluation of this environment. AIMS: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of scrummage engagement sequences on spinal kinematics of the hooker. The conditions investigated were: (1) live competitive scrummaging using the new ‘crouch, bind, set’ sequence; (2) live competitive scrummaging using the old ‘crouch touch pause engage’ sequence and (3) training scrummaging using a scrum machine. METHODS: Inertial sensors provided three-dimensional kinematic data across 5 spinal regions. Participants (n=29) were adult, male community club and university-level hookers. RESULTS: Engagement sequence had no effect on resultant kinematics of any spinal region. Machine scrummaging resulted in lesser magnitudes of motion in the upper spinal regions. Around two-thirds of the total available cervical motion was utilised during live scrummaging. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that the most recent laws do not influence the spinal kinematics of the hooker during live scrummaging; however, there may be other benefits from these law changes that fall outside the scope of this investigation. BMJ Publishing Group 2016-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5117027/ /pubmed/27900153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000064 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Research Swaminathan, Ramesh Williams, Jonathan M Jones, Michael D Theobald, Peter S Does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics? |
title | Does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics? |
title_full | Does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics? |
title_fullStr | Does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics? |
title_short | Does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics? |
title_sort | does the new rugby union scrum sequence positively influence the hooker's in situ spinal kinematics? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27900153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swaminathanramesh doesthenewrugbyunionscrumsequencepositivelyinfluencethehookersinsituspinalkinematics AT williamsjonathanm doesthenewrugbyunionscrumsequencepositivelyinfluencethehookersinsituspinalkinematics AT jonesmichaeld doesthenewrugbyunionscrumsequencepositivelyinfluencethehookersinsituspinalkinematics AT theobaldpeters doesthenewrugbyunionscrumsequencepositivelyinfluencethehookersinsituspinalkinematics |