Cargando…
Empirical and philosophical analysis of physicians’ judgments of medical indications
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate whether physicians who felt strongly for or against a treatment, in this case a moderately life prolonging non-curative cancer treatment, differed in their estimation of medical indication for this treatment as compared to physicians who had no su...
Autores principales: | Björk, Joar, Lynöe, Niels, Juth, Niklas |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117119/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27904437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1477750916657666 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Is healthcare providers’ value-neutrality depending on how controversial a medical intervention is? Analysis of 10 more or less controversial interventions
por: Lynöe, Niels, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
“Right to recommend, wrong to require”- an empirical and philosophical study of the views among physicians and the general public on smoking cessation as a condition for surgery
por: Björk, Joar, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
‘Are smokers less deserving of expensive treatment? A randomised controlled trial that goes beyond official values’
por: Björk, Joar, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Virtual colleagues, virtually colleagues—physicians’ use of Twitter: a population-based observational study
por: Brynolf, Anne, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Responsible research and innovation: A manifesto for empirical ethics?
por: Gardner, John, et al.
Publicado: (2015)