Cargando…

Photoperiod induced obesity in the Brandt's vole (Lasiopodomys brandtii): a model of ‘healthy obesity’?

Brandt's voles have an annual cycle of body weight and adiposity. These changes can be induced in the laboratory by manipulation of photoperiod. In the present study, male captive-bred Brandt's voles aged 35 days were acclimated to a short day (SD) photoperiod (8L:16D) for 70 days. A subgr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Xin-Yu, Yang, Deng-Bao, Xu, Yan-Chao, Gronning, Marianne O. L., Zhang, Fang, Wang, De-Hua, Speakman, John R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Company of Biologists Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27736740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.026070
_version_ 1782468778689298432
author Liu, Xin-Yu
Yang, Deng-Bao
Xu, Yan-Chao
Gronning, Marianne O. L.
Zhang, Fang
Wang, De-Hua
Speakman, John R.
author_facet Liu, Xin-Yu
Yang, Deng-Bao
Xu, Yan-Chao
Gronning, Marianne O. L.
Zhang, Fang
Wang, De-Hua
Speakman, John R.
author_sort Liu, Xin-Yu
collection PubMed
description Brandt's voles have an annual cycle of body weight and adiposity. These changes can be induced in the laboratory by manipulation of photoperiod. In the present study, male captive-bred Brandt's voles aged 35 days were acclimated to a short day (SD) photoperiod (8L:16D) for 70 days. A subgroup of individuals (n=16) were implanted with transmitters to monitor physical activity and body temperature. They were then randomly allocated into long day (LD=16L:8D) (n=19, 8 with transmitters) and SD (n=18, 8 with transmitters) groups for an additional 70 days. We monitored aspects of energy balance, glucose and insulin tolerance (GTT and ITT), body composition and organ fat content after exposure to the different photoperiods. LD voles increased in weight for 35 days and then re-established stability at a higher level. At the end of the experiment LD-exposed voles had greater white adipose tissue mass than SD voles (P=0.003). During weight gain they did not differ in their food intake or digestive efficiency; however, daily energy expenditure was significantly reduced in the LD compared with SD animals (ANCOVA, P<0.05) and there was a trend to reduced resting metabolic rate RMR (P=0.075). Physical activity levels were unchanged. Despite different levels of fat storage, the GTT and ITT responses of SD and LD voles were not significantly different, and these traits were not correlated to body fatness. Hence, the photoperiod-induced obesity was independent on disruptions to glucose homeostasis, indicating a potential adaptive decoupling of these states in evolutionary time. Fat content in both the liver and muscle showed no significant difference between LD and SD animals. How voles overcome the common negative aspects of fat storage might make them a useful model for understanding the phenomenon of ‘healthy obesity’.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5117229
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Company of Biologists Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51172292016-12-12 Photoperiod induced obesity in the Brandt's vole (Lasiopodomys brandtii): a model of ‘healthy obesity’? Liu, Xin-Yu Yang, Deng-Bao Xu, Yan-Chao Gronning, Marianne O. L. Zhang, Fang Wang, De-Hua Speakman, John R. Dis Model Mech Research Article Brandt's voles have an annual cycle of body weight and adiposity. These changes can be induced in the laboratory by manipulation of photoperiod. In the present study, male captive-bred Brandt's voles aged 35 days were acclimated to a short day (SD) photoperiod (8L:16D) for 70 days. A subgroup of individuals (n=16) were implanted with transmitters to monitor physical activity and body temperature. They were then randomly allocated into long day (LD=16L:8D) (n=19, 8 with transmitters) and SD (n=18, 8 with transmitters) groups for an additional 70 days. We monitored aspects of energy balance, glucose and insulin tolerance (GTT and ITT), body composition and organ fat content after exposure to the different photoperiods. LD voles increased in weight for 35 days and then re-established stability at a higher level. At the end of the experiment LD-exposed voles had greater white adipose tissue mass than SD voles (P=0.003). During weight gain they did not differ in their food intake or digestive efficiency; however, daily energy expenditure was significantly reduced in the LD compared with SD animals (ANCOVA, P<0.05) and there was a trend to reduced resting metabolic rate RMR (P=0.075). Physical activity levels were unchanged. Despite different levels of fat storage, the GTT and ITT responses of SD and LD voles were not significantly different, and these traits were not correlated to body fatness. Hence, the photoperiod-induced obesity was independent on disruptions to glucose homeostasis, indicating a potential adaptive decoupling of these states in evolutionary time. Fat content in both the liver and muscle showed no significant difference between LD and SD animals. How voles overcome the common negative aspects of fat storage might make them a useful model for understanding the phenomenon of ‘healthy obesity’. The Company of Biologists Ltd 2016-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5117229/ /pubmed/27736740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.026070 Text en © 2016. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided that the original work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Research Article
Liu, Xin-Yu
Yang, Deng-Bao
Xu, Yan-Chao
Gronning, Marianne O. L.
Zhang, Fang
Wang, De-Hua
Speakman, John R.
Photoperiod induced obesity in the Brandt's vole (Lasiopodomys brandtii): a model of ‘healthy obesity’?
title Photoperiod induced obesity in the Brandt's vole (Lasiopodomys brandtii): a model of ‘healthy obesity’?
title_full Photoperiod induced obesity in the Brandt's vole (Lasiopodomys brandtii): a model of ‘healthy obesity’?
title_fullStr Photoperiod induced obesity in the Brandt's vole (Lasiopodomys brandtii): a model of ‘healthy obesity’?
title_full_unstemmed Photoperiod induced obesity in the Brandt's vole (Lasiopodomys brandtii): a model of ‘healthy obesity’?
title_short Photoperiod induced obesity in the Brandt's vole (Lasiopodomys brandtii): a model of ‘healthy obesity’?
title_sort photoperiod induced obesity in the brandt's vole (lasiopodomys brandtii): a model of ‘healthy obesity’?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117229/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27736740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1242/dmm.026070
work_keys_str_mv AT liuxinyu photoperiodinducedobesityinthebrandtsvolelasiopodomysbrandtiiamodelofhealthyobesity
AT yangdengbao photoperiodinducedobesityinthebrandtsvolelasiopodomysbrandtiiamodelofhealthyobesity
AT xuyanchao photoperiodinducedobesityinthebrandtsvolelasiopodomysbrandtiiamodelofhealthyobesity
AT gronningmarianneol photoperiodinducedobesityinthebrandtsvolelasiopodomysbrandtiiamodelofhealthyobesity
AT zhangfang photoperiodinducedobesityinthebrandtsvolelasiopodomysbrandtiiamodelofhealthyobesity
AT wangdehua photoperiodinducedobesityinthebrandtsvolelasiopodomysbrandtiiamodelofhealthyobesity
AT speakmanjohnr photoperiodinducedobesityinthebrandtsvolelasiopodomysbrandtiiamodelofhealthyobesity