Cargando…

Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users

Combined use of a hearing aid (HA) and cochlear implant (CI) has been shown to improve CI users’ speech and music performance. However, different hearing devices, test stimuli, and listening tasks may interact and obscure bimodal benefits. In this study, speech and music perception were measured in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crew, Joseph D., Galvin, John J., Fu, Qian-Jie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27837051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216516669329
_version_ 1782468784877993984
author Crew, Joseph D.
Galvin, John J.
Fu, Qian-Jie
author_facet Crew, Joseph D.
Galvin, John J.
Fu, Qian-Jie
author_sort Crew, Joseph D.
collection PubMed
description Combined use of a hearing aid (HA) and cochlear implant (CI) has been shown to improve CI users’ speech and music performance. However, different hearing devices, test stimuli, and listening tasks may interact and obscure bimodal benefits. In this study, speech and music perception were measured in bimodal listeners for CI-only, HA-only, and CI + HA conditions, using the Sung Speech Corpus, a database of monosyllabic words produced at different fundamental frequencies. Sentence recognition was measured using sung speech in which pitch was held constant or varied across words, as well as for spoken speech. Melodic contour identification (MCI) was measured using sung speech in which the words were held constant or varied across notes. Results showed that sentence recognition was poorer with sung speech relative to spoken, with little difference between sung speech with a constant or variable pitch; mean performance was better with CI-only relative to HA-only, and best with CI + HA. MCI performance was better with constant words versus variable words; mean performance was better with HA-only than with CI-only and was best with CI + HA. Relative to CI-only, a strong bimodal benefit was observed for speech and music perception. Relative to the better ear, bimodal benefits remained strong for sentence recognition but were marginal for MCI. While variations in pitch and timbre may negatively affect CI users’ speech and music perception, bimodal listening may partially compensate for these deficits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5117252
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51172522016-11-28 Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users Crew, Joseph D. Galvin, John J. Fu, Qian-Jie Trends Hear Original Articles Combined use of a hearing aid (HA) and cochlear implant (CI) has been shown to improve CI users’ speech and music performance. However, different hearing devices, test stimuli, and listening tasks may interact and obscure bimodal benefits. In this study, speech and music perception were measured in bimodal listeners for CI-only, HA-only, and CI + HA conditions, using the Sung Speech Corpus, a database of monosyllabic words produced at different fundamental frequencies. Sentence recognition was measured using sung speech in which pitch was held constant or varied across words, as well as for spoken speech. Melodic contour identification (MCI) was measured using sung speech in which the words were held constant or varied across notes. Results showed that sentence recognition was poorer with sung speech relative to spoken, with little difference between sung speech with a constant or variable pitch; mean performance was better with CI-only relative to HA-only, and best with CI + HA. MCI performance was better with constant words versus variable words; mean performance was better with HA-only than with CI-only and was best with CI + HA. Relative to CI-only, a strong bimodal benefit was observed for speech and music perception. Relative to the better ear, bimodal benefits remained strong for sentence recognition but were marginal for MCI. While variations in pitch and timbre may negatively affect CI users’ speech and music perception, bimodal listening may partially compensate for these deficits. SAGE Publications 2016-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5117252/ /pubmed/27837051 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216516669329 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Crew, Joseph D.
Galvin, John J.
Fu, Qian-Jie
Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users
title Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users
title_full Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users
title_fullStr Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users
title_full_unstemmed Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users
title_short Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users
title_sort perception of sung speech in bimodal cochlear implant users
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117252/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27837051
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216516669329
work_keys_str_mv AT crewjosephd perceptionofsungspeechinbimodalcochlearimplantusers
AT galvinjohnj perceptionofsungspeechinbimodalcochlearimplantusers
AT fuqianjie perceptionofsungspeechinbimodalcochlearimplantusers