Cargando…

Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design

BACKGROUND: Standard radiotherapy is the treatment of first choice in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases, but is only moderately effective. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is increasingly used to treat spinal metastases, without randomized evidence of superiority over standard radiother...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Velden, Joanne M., Verkooijen, Helena M., Seravalli, Enrica, Hes, Jochem, Gerlich, A. Sophie, Kasperts, Nicolien, Eppinga, Wietse S. C., Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan, van Vulpen, Marco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27871280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2947-0
_version_ 1782468820622901248
author van der Velden, Joanne M.
Verkooijen, Helena M.
Seravalli, Enrica
Hes, Jochem
Gerlich, A. Sophie
Kasperts, Nicolien
Eppinga, Wietse S. C.
Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan
van Vulpen, Marco
author_facet van der Velden, Joanne M.
Verkooijen, Helena M.
Seravalli, Enrica
Hes, Jochem
Gerlich, A. Sophie
Kasperts, Nicolien
Eppinga, Wietse S. C.
Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan
van Vulpen, Marco
author_sort van der Velden, Joanne M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Standard radiotherapy is the treatment of first choice in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases, but is only moderately effective. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is increasingly used to treat spinal metastases, without randomized evidence of superiority over standard radiotherapy. The VERTICAL study aims to quantify the effect of stereotactic radiation therapy in patients with metastatic spinal disease. METHODS/DESIGN: This study follows the ‘cohort multiple Randomized Controlled Trial’ design. The VERTICAL study is conducted within the PRESENT cohort. In PRESENT, all patients with bone metastases referred for radiation therapy are enrolled. For each patient, clinical and patient-reported outcomes are captured at baseline and at regular intervals during follow-up. In addition, patients give informed consent to be offered experimental interventions. Within PRESENT, 110 patients are identified as a sub cohort of eligible patients (i.e. patients with unirradiated painful, mechanically stable spinal metastases who are able to undergo stereotactic radiation therapy). After a protocol amendment, also patients with non-spinal bony metastases are eligible. From the sub cohort, a random selection of patients is offered stereotactic radiation therapy (n = 55), which patients may accept or refuse. Only patients accepting stereotactic radiation therapy sign informed consent for the VERTICAL trial. Non-selected patients (n = 55) receive standard radiotherapy, and are not aware of them serving as controls. Primary endpoint is pain response after three months. Data will be analyzed by intention to treat, complemented by instrumental variable analysis in case of substantial refusal of the stereotactic radiation therapy in the intervention arm. DISCUSSION: This study is designed to quantify the treatment response after (stereotactic) radiation therapy in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases. This is the first randomized study in palliative care following the cohort multiple Randomized Controlled Trial design. This design addresses common difficulties associated with classic pragmatic randomized controlled trials, such as disappointment bias in patients allocated to the control arm, slow recruitment, and poor generalizability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands Trials Register number NL49316.041.14. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT02364115. Date of trial registration February 1, 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5117527
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51175272016-11-28 Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design van der Velden, Joanne M. Verkooijen, Helena M. Seravalli, Enrica Hes, Jochem Gerlich, A. Sophie Kasperts, Nicolien Eppinga, Wietse S. C. Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan van Vulpen, Marco BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Standard radiotherapy is the treatment of first choice in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases, but is only moderately effective. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is increasingly used to treat spinal metastases, without randomized evidence of superiority over standard radiotherapy. The VERTICAL study aims to quantify the effect of stereotactic radiation therapy in patients with metastatic spinal disease. METHODS/DESIGN: This study follows the ‘cohort multiple Randomized Controlled Trial’ design. The VERTICAL study is conducted within the PRESENT cohort. In PRESENT, all patients with bone metastases referred for radiation therapy are enrolled. For each patient, clinical and patient-reported outcomes are captured at baseline and at regular intervals during follow-up. In addition, patients give informed consent to be offered experimental interventions. Within PRESENT, 110 patients are identified as a sub cohort of eligible patients (i.e. patients with unirradiated painful, mechanically stable spinal metastases who are able to undergo stereotactic radiation therapy). After a protocol amendment, also patients with non-spinal bony metastases are eligible. From the sub cohort, a random selection of patients is offered stereotactic radiation therapy (n = 55), which patients may accept or refuse. Only patients accepting stereotactic radiation therapy sign informed consent for the VERTICAL trial. Non-selected patients (n = 55) receive standard radiotherapy, and are not aware of them serving as controls. Primary endpoint is pain response after three months. Data will be analyzed by intention to treat, complemented by instrumental variable analysis in case of substantial refusal of the stereotactic radiation therapy in the intervention arm. DISCUSSION: This study is designed to quantify the treatment response after (stereotactic) radiation therapy in patients with symptomatic spinal metastases. This is the first randomized study in palliative care following the cohort multiple Randomized Controlled Trial design. This design addresses common difficulties associated with classic pragmatic randomized controlled trials, such as disappointment bias in patients allocated to the control arm, slow recruitment, and poor generalizability. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Netherlands Trials Register number NL49316.041.14. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT02364115. Date of trial registration February 1, 2015. BioMed Central 2016-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5117527/ /pubmed/27871280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2947-0 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
van der Velden, Joanne M.
Verkooijen, Helena M.
Seravalli, Enrica
Hes, Jochem
Gerlich, A. Sophie
Kasperts, Nicolien
Eppinga, Wietse S. C.
Verlaan, Jorrit-Jan
van Vulpen, Marco
Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design
title Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design
title_full Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design
title_fullStr Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design
title_full_unstemmed Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design
title_short Comparing conVEntional RadioTherapy with stereotactIC body radiotherapy in patients with spinAL metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design
title_sort comparing conventional radiotherapy with stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with spinal metastases: study protocol for an randomized controlled trial following the cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117527/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27871280
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-016-2947-0
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderveldenjoannem comparingconventionalradiotherapywithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithspinalmetastasesstudyprotocolforanrandomizedcontrolledtrialfollowingthecohortmultiplerandomizedcontrolledtrialdesign
AT verkooijenhelenam comparingconventionalradiotherapywithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithspinalmetastasesstudyprotocolforanrandomizedcontrolledtrialfollowingthecohortmultiplerandomizedcontrolledtrialdesign
AT seravallienrica comparingconventionalradiotherapywithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithspinalmetastasesstudyprotocolforanrandomizedcontrolledtrialfollowingthecohortmultiplerandomizedcontrolledtrialdesign
AT hesjochem comparingconventionalradiotherapywithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithspinalmetastasesstudyprotocolforanrandomizedcontrolledtrialfollowingthecohortmultiplerandomizedcontrolledtrialdesign
AT gerlichasophie comparingconventionalradiotherapywithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithspinalmetastasesstudyprotocolforanrandomizedcontrolledtrialfollowingthecohortmultiplerandomizedcontrolledtrialdesign
AT kaspertsnicolien comparingconventionalradiotherapywithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithspinalmetastasesstudyprotocolforanrandomizedcontrolledtrialfollowingthecohortmultiplerandomizedcontrolledtrialdesign
AT eppingawietsesc comparingconventionalradiotherapywithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithspinalmetastasesstudyprotocolforanrandomizedcontrolledtrialfollowingthecohortmultiplerandomizedcontrolledtrialdesign
AT verlaanjorritjan comparingconventionalradiotherapywithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithspinalmetastasesstudyprotocolforanrandomizedcontrolledtrialfollowingthecohortmultiplerandomizedcontrolledtrialdesign
AT vanvulpenmarco comparingconventionalradiotherapywithstereotacticbodyradiotherapyinpatientswithspinalmetastasesstudyprotocolforanrandomizedcontrolledtrialfollowingthecohortmultiplerandomizedcontrolledtrialdesign