Cargando…

Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants

PURPOSE: Accurate prostate low dose-rate brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation is important for future care decisions. Presently, an evaluation is based on dosimetric quantifiers for the tumor and organs at risk. However, these do not account for effects of varying dose-rate, tumor repopulation an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Knaup, Courtney, Mavroidis, Panayiotis, Esquivel, Carlos, Baltas, Dimos, Stathakis, Sotirios, Swanson, Gregory, Papanikolaou, Nikos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27895673
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2011.23201
_version_ 1782468822218833920
author Knaup, Courtney
Mavroidis, Panayiotis
Esquivel, Carlos
Baltas, Dimos
Stathakis, Sotirios
Swanson, Gregory
Papanikolaou, Nikos
author_facet Knaup, Courtney
Mavroidis, Panayiotis
Esquivel, Carlos
Baltas, Dimos
Stathakis, Sotirios
Swanson, Gregory
Papanikolaou, Nikos
author_sort Knaup, Courtney
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Accurate prostate low dose-rate brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation is important for future care decisions. Presently, an evaluation is based on dosimetric quantifiers for the tumor and organs at risk. However, these do not account for effects of varying dose-rate, tumor repopulation and other biological effects. In this work, incorporation of the biological response is used to obtain more clinically relevant treatment plan evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven patients were evaluated. Each patient received a 145 Gy implant. Iodine-125 seeds were used and the treatment plans were created on the Prowess system. Based on CT images the post-implant plan was created. In the post-plan, the tumor, urethra, bladder and rectum were contoured. The biologically effective dose was used to determine the tumor control probability and the normal tissue complication probabilities for the urethra, bladder, rectum and surrounding tissue. RESULTS: The average tumor control probability and complication probabilities for the urethra, bladder, rectum and surrounding tissue were 99%, 29%, 0%, 12% and 6%, respectively. These measures provide a simpler means for evaluation and since they include radiobiological factors, they provide more reliable estimation of the treatment outcome.  CONCLUSIONS: The goal of this work was to create more clinically relevant prostate seed-implant evaluation by incorporating radiobiological measures. This resulted in a simpler descriptor of treatment plan quality and was consistent with patient outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5117534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51175342016-11-28 Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants Knaup, Courtney Mavroidis, Panayiotis Esquivel, Carlos Baltas, Dimos Stathakis, Sotirios Swanson, Gregory Papanikolaou, Nikos J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Article PURPOSE: Accurate prostate low dose-rate brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation is important for future care decisions. Presently, an evaluation is based on dosimetric quantifiers for the tumor and organs at risk. However, these do not account for effects of varying dose-rate, tumor repopulation and other biological effects. In this work, incorporation of the biological response is used to obtain more clinically relevant treatment plan evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven patients were evaluated. Each patient received a 145 Gy implant. Iodine-125 seeds were used and the treatment plans were created on the Prowess system. Based on CT images the post-implant plan was created. In the post-plan, the tumor, urethra, bladder and rectum were contoured. The biologically effective dose was used to determine the tumor control probability and the normal tissue complication probabilities for the urethra, bladder, rectum and surrounding tissue. RESULTS: The average tumor control probability and complication probabilities for the urethra, bladder, rectum and surrounding tissue were 99%, 29%, 0%, 12% and 6%, respectively. These measures provide a simpler means for evaluation and since they include radiobiological factors, they provide more reliable estimation of the treatment outcome.  CONCLUSIONS: The goal of this work was to create more clinically relevant prostate seed-implant evaluation by incorporating radiobiological measures. This resulted in a simpler descriptor of treatment plan quality and was consistent with patient outcomes. Termedia Publishing House 2011-07-06 2011-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5117534/ /pubmed/27895673 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2011.23201 Text en Copyright: © 2011 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.
spellingShingle Original Article
Knaup, Courtney
Mavroidis, Panayiotis
Esquivel, Carlos
Baltas, Dimos
Stathakis, Sotirios
Swanson, Gregory
Papanikolaou, Nikos
Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants
title Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants
title_full Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants
title_fullStr Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants
title_full_unstemmed Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants
title_short Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants
title_sort radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27895673
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2011.23201
work_keys_str_mv AT knaupcourtney radiobiologicallybasedtreatmentplanevaluationforprostateseedimplants
AT mavroidispanayiotis radiobiologicallybasedtreatmentplanevaluationforprostateseedimplants
AT esquivelcarlos radiobiologicallybasedtreatmentplanevaluationforprostateseedimplants
AT baltasdimos radiobiologicallybasedtreatmentplanevaluationforprostateseedimplants
AT stathakissotirios radiobiologicallybasedtreatmentplanevaluationforprostateseedimplants
AT swansongregory radiobiologicallybasedtreatmentplanevaluationforprostateseedimplants
AT papanikolaounikos radiobiologicallybasedtreatmentplanevaluationforprostateseedimplants