Cargando…
Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants
PURPOSE: Accurate prostate low dose-rate brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation is important for future care decisions. Presently, an evaluation is based on dosimetric quantifiers for the tumor and organs at risk. However, these do not account for effects of varying dose-rate, tumor repopulation an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2011
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27895673 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2011.23201 |
_version_ | 1782468822218833920 |
---|---|
author | Knaup, Courtney Mavroidis, Panayiotis Esquivel, Carlos Baltas, Dimos Stathakis, Sotirios Swanson, Gregory Papanikolaou, Nikos |
author_facet | Knaup, Courtney Mavroidis, Panayiotis Esquivel, Carlos Baltas, Dimos Stathakis, Sotirios Swanson, Gregory Papanikolaou, Nikos |
author_sort | Knaup, Courtney |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Accurate prostate low dose-rate brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation is important for future care decisions. Presently, an evaluation is based on dosimetric quantifiers for the tumor and organs at risk. However, these do not account for effects of varying dose-rate, tumor repopulation and other biological effects. In this work, incorporation of the biological response is used to obtain more clinically relevant treatment plan evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven patients were evaluated. Each patient received a 145 Gy implant. Iodine-125 seeds were used and the treatment plans were created on the Prowess system. Based on CT images the post-implant plan was created. In the post-plan, the tumor, urethra, bladder and rectum were contoured. The biologically effective dose was used to determine the tumor control probability and the normal tissue complication probabilities for the urethra, bladder, rectum and surrounding tissue. RESULTS: The average tumor control probability and complication probabilities for the urethra, bladder, rectum and surrounding tissue were 99%, 29%, 0%, 12% and 6%, respectively. These measures provide a simpler means for evaluation and since they include radiobiological factors, they provide more reliable estimation of the treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The goal of this work was to create more clinically relevant prostate seed-implant evaluation by incorporating radiobiological measures. This resulted in a simpler descriptor of treatment plan quality and was consistent with patient outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5117534 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2011 |
publisher | Termedia Publishing House |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51175342016-11-28 Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants Knaup, Courtney Mavroidis, Panayiotis Esquivel, Carlos Baltas, Dimos Stathakis, Sotirios Swanson, Gregory Papanikolaou, Nikos J Contemp Brachytherapy Original Article PURPOSE: Accurate prostate low dose-rate brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation is important for future care decisions. Presently, an evaluation is based on dosimetric quantifiers for the tumor and organs at risk. However, these do not account for effects of varying dose-rate, tumor repopulation and other biological effects. In this work, incorporation of the biological response is used to obtain more clinically relevant treatment plan evaluation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven patients were evaluated. Each patient received a 145 Gy implant. Iodine-125 seeds were used and the treatment plans were created on the Prowess system. Based on CT images the post-implant plan was created. In the post-plan, the tumor, urethra, bladder and rectum were contoured. The biologically effective dose was used to determine the tumor control probability and the normal tissue complication probabilities for the urethra, bladder, rectum and surrounding tissue. RESULTS: The average tumor control probability and complication probabilities for the urethra, bladder, rectum and surrounding tissue were 99%, 29%, 0%, 12% and 6%, respectively. These measures provide a simpler means for evaluation and since they include radiobiological factors, they provide more reliable estimation of the treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The goal of this work was to create more clinically relevant prostate seed-implant evaluation by incorporating radiobiological measures. This resulted in a simpler descriptor of treatment plan quality and was consistent with patient outcomes. Termedia Publishing House 2011-07-06 2011-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5117534/ /pubmed/27895673 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2011.23201 Text en Copyright: © 2011 Termedia Sp. z o. o. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) License, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Knaup, Courtney Mavroidis, Panayiotis Esquivel, Carlos Baltas, Dimos Stathakis, Sotirios Swanson, Gregory Papanikolaou, Nikos Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants |
title | Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants |
title_full | Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants |
title_fullStr | Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants |
title_short | Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants |
title_sort | radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117534/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27895673 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/jcb.2011.23201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT knaupcourtney radiobiologicallybasedtreatmentplanevaluationforprostateseedimplants AT mavroidispanayiotis radiobiologicallybasedtreatmentplanevaluationforprostateseedimplants AT esquivelcarlos radiobiologicallybasedtreatmentplanevaluationforprostateseedimplants AT baltasdimos radiobiologicallybasedtreatmentplanevaluationforprostateseedimplants AT stathakissotirios radiobiologicallybasedtreatmentplanevaluationforprostateseedimplants AT swansongregory radiobiologicallybasedtreatmentplanevaluationforprostateseedimplants AT papanikolaounikos radiobiologicallybasedtreatmentplanevaluationforprostateseedimplants |