Cargando…
Are early first trimester weights valid proxies for preconception weight?
BACKGROUND: An accurate estimate of preconception weight is necessary for providing a gestational weight gain range based on the Institute of Medicine’s guidelines; however, an accurate and proximal preconception weight is not available for most women. We examined the validity of first trimester wei...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27871260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1159-6 |
_version_ | 1782468826096467968 |
---|---|
author | Krukowski, Rebecca A. West, Delia S. DiCarlo, Marisha Shankar, Kartik Cleves, Mario A. Saylors, Marie E. Andres, Aline |
author_facet | Krukowski, Rebecca A. West, Delia S. DiCarlo, Marisha Shankar, Kartik Cleves, Mario A. Saylors, Marie E. Andres, Aline |
author_sort | Krukowski, Rebecca A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: An accurate estimate of preconception weight is necessary for providing a gestational weight gain range based on the Institute of Medicine’s guidelines; however, an accurate and proximal preconception weight is not available for most women. We examined the validity of first trimester weights for estimating preconception body mass index category. METHODS: Under identical measurement conditions, preconception weight and two first trimester weights (i.e., 4–10 and 12 weeks gestation) were obtained (n = 43). RESULTS: The 4–10 week and the 12 week weight correctly classified 95 and 91% women, respectively. Mean weight changes were relatively small overall (M = 0.74 ± 1.99 kg at 4–10 weeks and M = 1.02 ± 2.46 at 12 weeks). There was a significant difference in mean weight gain by body mass index category at 4–10 weeks (−0.09 ± 1.86 kg for normal weight participants vs. 1.61 + 1.76 kg for overweight/obese participants, p = 0.01), but not at 12 weeks (0.53 ± 2.29 kg for normal weight participants vs. 1.54 ± 2.58 kg for overweight/obese participants). CONCLUSIONS: Assigning gestational weight gain guidelines based on an early first trimester weight resulted in 5–9% of women being misclassified depending on the gestational week the weight was obtained. Thus, most women are correctly classified based on a first trimester weight, particularly an early first trimester weight, although it is possible that modeling strategies could be developed to further improve estimates of preconception body mass index category. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov # NCT01131117, registered May 25, 2010. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5117552 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51175522016-11-28 Are early first trimester weights valid proxies for preconception weight? Krukowski, Rebecca A. West, Delia S. DiCarlo, Marisha Shankar, Kartik Cleves, Mario A. Saylors, Marie E. Andres, Aline BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: An accurate estimate of preconception weight is necessary for providing a gestational weight gain range based on the Institute of Medicine’s guidelines; however, an accurate and proximal preconception weight is not available for most women. We examined the validity of first trimester weights for estimating preconception body mass index category. METHODS: Under identical measurement conditions, preconception weight and two first trimester weights (i.e., 4–10 and 12 weeks gestation) were obtained (n = 43). RESULTS: The 4–10 week and the 12 week weight correctly classified 95 and 91% women, respectively. Mean weight changes were relatively small overall (M = 0.74 ± 1.99 kg at 4–10 weeks and M = 1.02 ± 2.46 at 12 weeks). There was a significant difference in mean weight gain by body mass index category at 4–10 weeks (−0.09 ± 1.86 kg for normal weight participants vs. 1.61 + 1.76 kg for overweight/obese participants, p = 0.01), but not at 12 weeks (0.53 ± 2.29 kg for normal weight participants vs. 1.54 ± 2.58 kg for overweight/obese participants). CONCLUSIONS: Assigning gestational weight gain guidelines based on an early first trimester weight resulted in 5–9% of women being misclassified depending on the gestational week the weight was obtained. Thus, most women are correctly classified based on a first trimester weight, particularly an early first trimester weight, although it is possible that modeling strategies could be developed to further improve estimates of preconception body mass index category. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov # NCT01131117, registered May 25, 2010. BioMed Central 2016-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5117552/ /pubmed/27871260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1159-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Krukowski, Rebecca A. West, Delia S. DiCarlo, Marisha Shankar, Kartik Cleves, Mario A. Saylors, Marie E. Andres, Aline Are early first trimester weights valid proxies for preconception weight? |
title | Are early first trimester weights valid proxies for preconception weight? |
title_full | Are early first trimester weights valid proxies for preconception weight? |
title_fullStr | Are early first trimester weights valid proxies for preconception weight? |
title_full_unstemmed | Are early first trimester weights valid proxies for preconception weight? |
title_short | Are early first trimester weights valid proxies for preconception weight? |
title_sort | are early first trimester weights valid proxies for preconception weight? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117552/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27871260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1159-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT krukowskirebeccaa areearlyfirsttrimesterweightsvalidproxiesforpreconceptionweight AT westdelias areearlyfirsttrimesterweightsvalidproxiesforpreconceptionweight AT dicarlomarisha areearlyfirsttrimesterweightsvalidproxiesforpreconceptionweight AT shankarkartik areearlyfirsttrimesterweightsvalidproxiesforpreconceptionweight AT clevesmarioa areearlyfirsttrimesterweightsvalidproxiesforpreconceptionweight AT saylorsmariee areearlyfirsttrimesterweightsvalidproxiesforpreconceptionweight AT andresaline areearlyfirsttrimesterweightsvalidproxiesforpreconceptionweight |