Cargando…

Assessment of the dimensionality of the Wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire using factor analysis and Rasch analysis

BACKGROUND: Fear of childbirth has negative consequences for a woman's physical and emotional wellbeing. The most commonly used measurement tool for childbirth fear is the Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire (WDEQ-A). Although originally conceptualized as unidimensional, subsequent investig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pallant, J. F., Haines, H. M., Green, P., Toohill, J., Gamble, J., Creedy, D. K., Fenwick, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27871320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1157-8
_version_ 1782468840227078144
author Pallant, J. F.
Haines, H. M.
Green, P.
Toohill, J.
Gamble, J.
Creedy, D. K.
Fenwick, J.
author_facet Pallant, J. F.
Haines, H. M.
Green, P.
Toohill, J.
Gamble, J.
Creedy, D. K.
Fenwick, J.
author_sort Pallant, J. F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fear of childbirth has negative consequences for a woman's physical and emotional wellbeing. The most commonly used measurement tool for childbirth fear is the Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire (WDEQ-A). Although originally conceptualized as unidimensional, subsequent investigations have suggested it is multidimensional. This study aimed to undertake a detailed psychometric assessment of the WDEQ-A; exploring the dimensionality and identifying possible subscales that may have clinical and research utility. METHODS: WDEQ-A was administered to a sample of 1410 Australian women in mid-pregnancy. The dimensionality of WDEQ-A was explored using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Rasch analysis. RESULTS: EFA identified a four factor solution. CFA failed to support the unidimensional structure of the original WDEQ-A, but confirmed the four factor solution identified by EFA. Rasch analysis was used to refine the four subscales (Negative emotions: five items; Lack of positive emotions: five items; Social isolation: four items; Moment of birth: three items). Each WDEQ-A Revised subscale showed good fit to the Rasch model and adequate internal consistency reliability. The correlation between Negative emotions and Lack of positive emotions was strong, however Moment of birth and Social isolation showed much lower intercorrelations, suggesting they should not be added to create a total score. CONCLUSION: This study supports the findings of other investigations that suggest the WDEQ-A is multidimensional and should not be used in its original form. The WDEQ-A Revised may provide researchers with a more refined, psychometrically sound tool to explore the differential impact of aspects of childbirth fear. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1157-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5117613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51176132016-11-28 Assessment of the dimensionality of the Wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire using factor analysis and Rasch analysis Pallant, J. F. Haines, H. M. Green, P. Toohill, J. Gamble, J. Creedy, D. K. Fenwick, J. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Fear of childbirth has negative consequences for a woman's physical and emotional wellbeing. The most commonly used measurement tool for childbirth fear is the Wijma Delivery Expectancy Questionnaire (WDEQ-A). Although originally conceptualized as unidimensional, subsequent investigations have suggested it is multidimensional. This study aimed to undertake a detailed psychometric assessment of the WDEQ-A; exploring the dimensionality and identifying possible subscales that may have clinical and research utility. METHODS: WDEQ-A was administered to a sample of 1410 Australian women in mid-pregnancy. The dimensionality of WDEQ-A was explored using exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Rasch analysis. RESULTS: EFA identified a four factor solution. CFA failed to support the unidimensional structure of the original WDEQ-A, but confirmed the four factor solution identified by EFA. Rasch analysis was used to refine the four subscales (Negative emotions: five items; Lack of positive emotions: five items; Social isolation: four items; Moment of birth: three items). Each WDEQ-A Revised subscale showed good fit to the Rasch model and adequate internal consistency reliability. The correlation between Negative emotions and Lack of positive emotions was strong, however Moment of birth and Social isolation showed much lower intercorrelations, suggesting they should not be added to create a total score. CONCLUSION: This study supports the findings of other investigations that suggest the WDEQ-A is multidimensional and should not be used in its original form. The WDEQ-A Revised may provide researchers with a more refined, psychometrically sound tool to explore the differential impact of aspects of childbirth fear. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12884-016-1157-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5117613/ /pubmed/27871320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1157-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pallant, J. F.
Haines, H. M.
Green, P.
Toohill, J.
Gamble, J.
Creedy, D. K.
Fenwick, J.
Assessment of the dimensionality of the Wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire using factor analysis and Rasch analysis
title Assessment of the dimensionality of the Wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire using factor analysis and Rasch analysis
title_full Assessment of the dimensionality of the Wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire using factor analysis and Rasch analysis
title_fullStr Assessment of the dimensionality of the Wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire using factor analysis and Rasch analysis
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the dimensionality of the Wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire using factor analysis and Rasch analysis
title_short Assessment of the dimensionality of the Wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire using factor analysis and Rasch analysis
title_sort assessment of the dimensionality of the wijma delivery expectancy/experience questionnaire using factor analysis and rasch analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27871320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-1157-8
work_keys_str_mv AT pallantjf assessmentofthedimensionalityofthewijmadeliveryexpectancyexperiencequestionnaireusingfactoranalysisandraschanalysis
AT haineshm assessmentofthedimensionalityofthewijmadeliveryexpectancyexperiencequestionnaireusingfactoranalysisandraschanalysis
AT greenp assessmentofthedimensionalityofthewijmadeliveryexpectancyexperiencequestionnaireusingfactoranalysisandraschanalysis
AT toohillj assessmentofthedimensionalityofthewijmadeliveryexpectancyexperiencequestionnaireusingfactoranalysisandraschanalysis
AT gamblej assessmentofthedimensionalityofthewijmadeliveryexpectancyexperiencequestionnaireusingfactoranalysisandraschanalysis
AT creedydk assessmentofthedimensionalityofthewijmadeliveryexpectancyexperiencequestionnaireusingfactoranalysisandraschanalysis
AT fenwickj assessmentofthedimensionalityofthewijmadeliveryexpectancyexperiencequestionnaireusingfactoranalysisandraschanalysis