Cargando…

Nurses’ perceptions of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle: a qualitative descriptive study

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcer prevention is a critical patient safety indicator for acute care hospitals. An innovative pressure ulcer prevention care bundle targeting patient participation in their care was recently tested in a cluster randomised trial in eight Australian hospitals. Understanding nurs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Shelley, McInnes, Elizabeth, Wallis, Marianne, Bucknall, Tracey, Banks, Merrilyn, Chaboyer, Wendy
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27895528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0188-9
_version_ 1782468844141412352
author Roberts, Shelley
McInnes, Elizabeth
Wallis, Marianne
Bucknall, Tracey
Banks, Merrilyn
Chaboyer, Wendy
author_facet Roberts, Shelley
McInnes, Elizabeth
Wallis, Marianne
Bucknall, Tracey
Banks, Merrilyn
Chaboyer, Wendy
author_sort Roberts, Shelley
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcer prevention is a critical patient safety indicator for acute care hospitals. An innovative pressure ulcer prevention care bundle targeting patient participation in their care was recently tested in a cluster randomised trial in eight Australian hospitals. Understanding nurses’ perspectives of such an intervention is imperative when interpreting results and translating evidence into practice. As part of a process evaluation for the main trial, this study assessed nurses’ perceptions of the usefulness and impact of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle intervention on clinical practice. METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study involved semi-structured interviews with nursing staff at four Australian hospitals that were intervention sites for a cluster randomised trial testing a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle. Four to five participants were purposively sampled at each site. A trained interviewer used a semi-structured interview guide to question participants about their perceptions of the care bundle. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen nurses from four hospitals participated in the study. Nurses’ perceptions of the intervention are described in five themes: 1) Awareness of the pressure ulcer prevention care bundle and its similarity to current practice; 2) Improving awareness, communication and participation with the pressure ulcer prevention care bundle; 3) Appreciating the positive aspects of patient participation in care; 4) Perceived barriers to engaging patients in the pressure ulcer prevention care bundle; and 5) Partnering with nursing staff to facilitate pressure ulcer prevention care bundle implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, nurses found the care bundle feasible and acceptable. They identified a number of benefits from the bundle, including improved communication, awareness and participation in pressure ulcer prevention care among patients and staff. However, nurses thought the care bundle was not appropriate or effective for all patients, such as those who were cognitively impaired. Perceived enablers to implementation of the bundle included facilitation through effective communication and dissemination of evidence about the care bundle; strong leadership and ability to influence staff behaviour; and simplicity of the care bundle.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5117662
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51176622016-11-28 Nurses’ perceptions of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle: a qualitative descriptive study Roberts, Shelley McInnes, Elizabeth Wallis, Marianne Bucknall, Tracey Banks, Merrilyn Chaboyer, Wendy BMC Nurs Research Article BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcer prevention is a critical patient safety indicator for acute care hospitals. An innovative pressure ulcer prevention care bundle targeting patient participation in their care was recently tested in a cluster randomised trial in eight Australian hospitals. Understanding nurses’ perspectives of such an intervention is imperative when interpreting results and translating evidence into practice. As part of a process evaluation for the main trial, this study assessed nurses’ perceptions of the usefulness and impact of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle intervention on clinical practice. METHODS: This qualitative descriptive study involved semi-structured interviews with nursing staff at four Australian hospitals that were intervention sites for a cluster randomised trial testing a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle. Four to five participants were purposively sampled at each site. A trained interviewer used a semi-structured interview guide to question participants about their perceptions of the care bundle. Interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen nurses from four hospitals participated in the study. Nurses’ perceptions of the intervention are described in five themes: 1) Awareness of the pressure ulcer prevention care bundle and its similarity to current practice; 2) Improving awareness, communication and participation with the pressure ulcer prevention care bundle; 3) Appreciating the positive aspects of patient participation in care; 4) Perceived barriers to engaging patients in the pressure ulcer prevention care bundle; and 5) Partnering with nursing staff to facilitate pressure ulcer prevention care bundle implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, nurses found the care bundle feasible and acceptable. They identified a number of benefits from the bundle, including improved communication, awareness and participation in pressure ulcer prevention care among patients and staff. However, nurses thought the care bundle was not appropriate or effective for all patients, such as those who were cognitively impaired. Perceived enablers to implementation of the bundle included facilitation through effective communication and dissemination of evidence about the care bundle; strong leadership and ability to influence staff behaviour; and simplicity of the care bundle. BioMed Central 2016-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC5117662/ /pubmed/27895528 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0188-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Roberts, Shelley
McInnes, Elizabeth
Wallis, Marianne
Bucknall, Tracey
Banks, Merrilyn
Chaboyer, Wendy
Nurses’ perceptions of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle: a qualitative descriptive study
title Nurses’ perceptions of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle: a qualitative descriptive study
title_full Nurses’ perceptions of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle: a qualitative descriptive study
title_fullStr Nurses’ perceptions of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle: a qualitative descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed Nurses’ perceptions of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle: a qualitative descriptive study
title_short Nurses’ perceptions of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle: a qualitative descriptive study
title_sort nurses’ perceptions of a pressure ulcer prevention care bundle: a qualitative descriptive study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5117662/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27895528
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-016-0188-9
work_keys_str_mv AT robertsshelley nursesperceptionsofapressureulcerpreventioncarebundleaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT mcinneselizabeth nursesperceptionsofapressureulcerpreventioncarebundleaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT wallismarianne nursesperceptionsofapressureulcerpreventioncarebundleaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT bucknalltracey nursesperceptionsofapressureulcerpreventioncarebundleaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT banksmerrilyn nursesperceptionsofapressureulcerpreventioncarebundleaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT chaboyerwendy nursesperceptionsofapressureulcerpreventioncarebundleaqualitativedescriptivestudy