Cargando…
The Efficacy of Infliximab Monotherapy versus Infliximab-Azathioprine Sequential Treatment in Crohn's Disease: Experience from a Tertiary Medical Center in China
Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of infliximab (IFX) monotherapy versus infliximab-azathioprine sequential treatment in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. Methods. Patients newly diagnosed with CD using IFX as induction therapy were enrolled. After 6 times of IFX infusions, they were divided int...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5118525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27896276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8648307 |
_version_ | 1782468943481405440 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Tianyu Wang, Zhengting Fan, Rong Zhang, Maochen Lin, Yun Hong, Liwen Zhou, Xiaolin Hu, Shurong Cheng, Mengmeng Zhong, Jie |
author_facet | Zhang, Tianyu Wang, Zhengting Fan, Rong Zhang, Maochen Lin, Yun Hong, Liwen Zhou, Xiaolin Hu, Shurong Cheng, Mengmeng Zhong, Jie |
author_sort | Zhang, Tianyu |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of infliximab (IFX) monotherapy versus infliximab-azathioprine sequential treatment in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. Methods. Patients newly diagnosed with CD using IFX as induction therapy were enrolled. After 6 times of IFX infusions, they were divided into IFX monotherapy group and IFX-AZA sequential therapy group. Clinical remission rates were assessed at weeks 57, 84, 111, and 138 while endoscopic remission rates were assessed at weeks 84 and 138 to evaluate the efficacy of these two groups. Results. A total of seventy-nine patients had accomplished 138-week follow-up. At weeks 84 and 138, the deep remission rate (18/22 and 17/22) of IFX monotherapy group was significantly higher compared to IFX-AZA sequential therapy group (26/57 and 21/57) (P = 0.004 and 0.001, resp.). Similar findings were found in complete endoscopic remission rate. The clinical remission rates of IFX monotherapy group were similar to that of IFX-AZA sequential therapy group (P > 0.05). At weeks 84 and 138, the endoscopic remission rate and the endoscopic improvement rate between these two groups displayed no significant difference (P > 0.05). Conclusion. IFX monotherapy provides higher deep remission rate compared with IFX-AZA sequential therapy in two-year maintenance therapy. For patients who could not receive prolonged IFX therapy, IFX-AZA sequential therapy is acceptable, though long-term efficacy remains to be seen. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5118525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51185252016-11-28 The Efficacy of Infliximab Monotherapy versus Infliximab-Azathioprine Sequential Treatment in Crohn's Disease: Experience from a Tertiary Medical Center in China Zhang, Tianyu Wang, Zhengting Fan, Rong Zhang, Maochen Lin, Yun Hong, Liwen Zhou, Xiaolin Hu, Shurong Cheng, Mengmeng Zhong, Jie Biomed Res Int Clinical Study Objective. To evaluate the efficacy of infliximab (IFX) monotherapy versus infliximab-azathioprine sequential treatment in Crohn's disease (CD) patients. Methods. Patients newly diagnosed with CD using IFX as induction therapy were enrolled. After 6 times of IFX infusions, they were divided into IFX monotherapy group and IFX-AZA sequential therapy group. Clinical remission rates were assessed at weeks 57, 84, 111, and 138 while endoscopic remission rates were assessed at weeks 84 and 138 to evaluate the efficacy of these two groups. Results. A total of seventy-nine patients had accomplished 138-week follow-up. At weeks 84 and 138, the deep remission rate (18/22 and 17/22) of IFX monotherapy group was significantly higher compared to IFX-AZA sequential therapy group (26/57 and 21/57) (P = 0.004 and 0.001, resp.). Similar findings were found in complete endoscopic remission rate. The clinical remission rates of IFX monotherapy group were similar to that of IFX-AZA sequential therapy group (P > 0.05). At weeks 84 and 138, the endoscopic remission rate and the endoscopic improvement rate between these two groups displayed no significant difference (P > 0.05). Conclusion. IFX monotherapy provides higher deep remission rate compared with IFX-AZA sequential therapy in two-year maintenance therapy. For patients who could not receive prolonged IFX therapy, IFX-AZA sequential therapy is acceptable, though long-term efficacy remains to be seen. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2016 2016-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5118525/ /pubmed/27896276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8648307 Text en Copyright © 2016 Tianyu Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Zhang, Tianyu Wang, Zhengting Fan, Rong Zhang, Maochen Lin, Yun Hong, Liwen Zhou, Xiaolin Hu, Shurong Cheng, Mengmeng Zhong, Jie The Efficacy of Infliximab Monotherapy versus Infliximab-Azathioprine Sequential Treatment in Crohn's Disease: Experience from a Tertiary Medical Center in China |
title | The Efficacy of Infliximab Monotherapy versus Infliximab-Azathioprine Sequential Treatment in Crohn's Disease: Experience from a Tertiary Medical Center in China |
title_full | The Efficacy of Infliximab Monotherapy versus Infliximab-Azathioprine Sequential Treatment in Crohn's Disease: Experience from a Tertiary Medical Center in China |
title_fullStr | The Efficacy of Infliximab Monotherapy versus Infliximab-Azathioprine Sequential Treatment in Crohn's Disease: Experience from a Tertiary Medical Center in China |
title_full_unstemmed | The Efficacy of Infliximab Monotherapy versus Infliximab-Azathioprine Sequential Treatment in Crohn's Disease: Experience from a Tertiary Medical Center in China |
title_short | The Efficacy of Infliximab Monotherapy versus Infliximab-Azathioprine Sequential Treatment in Crohn's Disease: Experience from a Tertiary Medical Center in China |
title_sort | efficacy of infliximab monotherapy versus infliximab-azathioprine sequential treatment in crohn's disease: experience from a tertiary medical center in china |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5118525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27896276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/8648307 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangtianyu theefficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT wangzhengting theefficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT fanrong theefficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT zhangmaochen theefficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT linyun theefficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT hongliwen theefficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT zhouxiaolin theefficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT hushurong theefficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT chengmengmeng theefficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT zhongjie theefficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT zhangtianyu efficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT wangzhengting efficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT fanrong efficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT zhangmaochen efficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT linyun efficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT hongliwen efficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT zhouxiaolin efficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT hushurong efficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT chengmengmeng efficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina AT zhongjie efficacyofinfliximabmonotherapyversusinfliximabazathioprinesequentialtreatmentincrohnsdiseaseexperiencefromatertiarymedicalcenterinchina |