Cargando…

Evaluating the safety, efficacy and complications of electrotherapy and its comparison with conventional method of hemorrhoidectomy

AIM: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and complications of electrotherapy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson technique). BACKGROUND: Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy is always associated with considerable pain and postoperative complications. Still, the electroth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nikooiyan, Payam, Mohammadi Sardo, Hamzeh, Poursaeidi, Bahram, Zaherara, Motahareh, Ahmadi, Bijan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5118850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27895851
_version_ 1782469005514113024
author Nikooiyan, Payam
Mohammadi Sardo, Hamzeh
Poursaeidi, Bahram
Zaherara, Motahareh
Ahmadi, Bijan
author_facet Nikooiyan, Payam
Mohammadi Sardo, Hamzeh
Poursaeidi, Bahram
Zaherara, Motahareh
Ahmadi, Bijan
author_sort Nikooiyan, Payam
collection PubMed
description AIM: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and complications of electrotherapy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson technique). BACKGROUND: Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy is always associated with considerable pain and postoperative complications. Still, the electrotherapy method in which the hemorrhoidal tissue is not removed may not improve critical complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was performed on patients with hemorrhoids referring to hospitals affiliated to the Kerman University of Medical Sciences during 2014-2015. One hundred and twenty patients presented with symptomatic hemorrhoids grade I, II, III, and IV were randomized into two groups. Group 1 (60 patients) underwent electrotherapy using 30 mA direct current and group 2 (60 patients) were submitted to Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. The groups were compared regarding postoperative pain severity and complications, including recurrent symptoms, infection and recovery time to return to normal activities. The p≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: More than 70% of patients in group 2 complained of severe pain, but in group 1, no more than 30% of patients experienced severe pain up to 6 hours post-surgery and 70% complained of mild pain 2-3 days post-surgery. Twenty four-hour hospitalization in group 2 and group 1 were 97% and 78%, respectively, whilst patients in electrotherapy group could be treated as outpatients. The mean return time to usual activities was 15 and 1.5 days for group 2 and 1, respectively. CONCLUSION: Electrotherapy with a direct current of 30 mA significantly reduce postoperative pain and the recovery period. This method showed a good success rate and less complication than the Ferguson method. As a result, because of more effectiveness, less pain, as well as shorter recovery time and getting back to normal activities, we recommend this procedure for the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids grade I, II, and III.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5118850
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51188502016-11-28 Evaluating the safety, efficacy and complications of electrotherapy and its comparison with conventional method of hemorrhoidectomy Nikooiyan, Payam Mohammadi Sardo, Hamzeh Poursaeidi, Bahram Zaherara, Motahareh Ahmadi, Bijan Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench Original Article AIM: This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy, safety and complications of electrotherapy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson technique). BACKGROUND: Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy is always associated with considerable pain and postoperative complications. Still, the electrotherapy method in which the hemorrhoidal tissue is not removed may not improve critical complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was performed on patients with hemorrhoids referring to hospitals affiliated to the Kerman University of Medical Sciences during 2014-2015. One hundred and twenty patients presented with symptomatic hemorrhoids grade I, II, III, and IV were randomized into two groups. Group 1 (60 patients) underwent electrotherapy using 30 mA direct current and group 2 (60 patients) were submitted to Ferguson hemorrhoidectomy. The groups were compared regarding postoperative pain severity and complications, including recurrent symptoms, infection and recovery time to return to normal activities. The p≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: More than 70% of patients in group 2 complained of severe pain, but in group 1, no more than 30% of patients experienced severe pain up to 6 hours post-surgery and 70% complained of mild pain 2-3 days post-surgery. Twenty four-hour hospitalization in group 2 and group 1 were 97% and 78%, respectively, whilst patients in electrotherapy group could be treated as outpatients. The mean return time to usual activities was 15 and 1.5 days for group 2 and 1, respectively. CONCLUSION: Electrotherapy with a direct current of 30 mA significantly reduce postoperative pain and the recovery period. This method showed a good success rate and less complication than the Ferguson method. As a result, because of more effectiveness, less pain, as well as shorter recovery time and getting back to normal activities, we recommend this procedure for the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids grade I, II, and III. Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5118850/ /pubmed/27895851 Text en ©2016 RIGLD, Research Institute for Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nikooiyan, Payam
Mohammadi Sardo, Hamzeh
Poursaeidi, Bahram
Zaherara, Motahareh
Ahmadi, Bijan
Evaluating the safety, efficacy and complications of electrotherapy and its comparison with conventional method of hemorrhoidectomy
title Evaluating the safety, efficacy and complications of electrotherapy and its comparison with conventional method of hemorrhoidectomy
title_full Evaluating the safety, efficacy and complications of electrotherapy and its comparison with conventional method of hemorrhoidectomy
title_fullStr Evaluating the safety, efficacy and complications of electrotherapy and its comparison with conventional method of hemorrhoidectomy
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the safety, efficacy and complications of electrotherapy and its comparison with conventional method of hemorrhoidectomy
title_short Evaluating the safety, efficacy and complications of electrotherapy and its comparison with conventional method of hemorrhoidectomy
title_sort evaluating the safety, efficacy and complications of electrotherapy and its comparison with conventional method of hemorrhoidectomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5118850/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27895851
work_keys_str_mv AT nikooiyanpayam evaluatingthesafetyefficacyandcomplicationsofelectrotherapyanditscomparisonwithconventionalmethodofhemorrhoidectomy
AT mohammadisardohamzeh evaluatingthesafetyefficacyandcomplicationsofelectrotherapyanditscomparisonwithconventionalmethodofhemorrhoidectomy
AT poursaeidibahram evaluatingthesafetyefficacyandcomplicationsofelectrotherapyanditscomparisonwithconventionalmethodofhemorrhoidectomy
AT zaheraramotahareh evaluatingthesafetyefficacyandcomplicationsofelectrotherapyanditscomparisonwithconventionalmethodofhemorrhoidectomy
AT ahmadibijan evaluatingthesafetyefficacyandcomplicationsofelectrotherapyanditscomparisonwithconventionalmethodofhemorrhoidectomy