Cargando…

Preparation of the femoral bone cavity in cementless stems: broaching versus compaction: A 5-year randomized radiostereometric and dual X-ray absorptiometry study of 40 bilateral 1-stage operations

Background and purpose — Short-term experimental studies have confirmed that there is superior fixation of cementless implants inserted with compaction compared to broaching of the cancellous bone. Patients and methods — 1-stage, bilateral primary THA was performed in 28 patients between May 2001 an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hjorth, Mette H, Stilling, Maiken, Søballe, Kjeld, Nielsen, Poul Torben, Christensen, Poul H, Kold, Søren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5119439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27759486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1244958
_version_ 1782469093038751744
author Hjorth, Mette H
Stilling, Maiken
Søballe, Kjeld
Nielsen, Poul Torben
Christensen, Poul H
Kold, Søren
author_facet Hjorth, Mette H
Stilling, Maiken
Søballe, Kjeld
Nielsen, Poul Torben
Christensen, Poul H
Kold, Søren
author_sort Hjorth, Mette H
collection PubMed
description Background and purpose — Short-term experimental studies have confirmed that there is superior fixation of cementless implants inserted with compaction compared to broaching of the cancellous bone. Patients and methods — 1-stage, bilateral primary THA was performed in 28 patients between May 2001 and September 2007. The patients were randomized to femoral bone preparation with broaching on 1 side and compaction on the other side. 8 patients declined to attend the postoperative follow-up, leaving 20 patients (13 male) with a mean age of 58 (36–70) years for evaluation. The patients were followed with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) at baseline, at 6 and 12 weeks, and at 1, 2, and 5 years, and measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) at baseline and at 1, 2, and 5 years. The subjective part of the Harris hip score (HHS) and details of complications throughout the observation period were obtained at a mean interval of 6.3 (3.0–9.5) years after surgery. Results — Femoral stems in the compaction group had a higher degree of medio-lateral migration (0.21 mm, 95% CI: 0.03–0.40) than femoral stems in the broaching group at 5 years (p = 0.02). No other significant differences in translations or rotations were found between the 2 surgical techniques at 2 years (p > 0.4) and 5 years (p > 0.7) postoperatively. There were no individual stems with continuous migration. Periprosthetic BMD in the 7 Gruen zones was similar at 2 years and at 5 years. Intraoperative femoral fractures occurred in 2 of 20 compacted hips, but there were none in the 20 broached hips. The HHS and dislocations were similar in the 2 groups at 6.3 (3.0–9.5) years after surgery. Interpretation — Bone compaction as a surgical technique with the Bi-Metric stem did not show the superior outcomes expected compared to conventional broaching. Furthermore, 2 periprosthetic fractures occurred using the compaction technique, so we cannot recommend compaction for insertion of the cementless Bi-Metric stem.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5119439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51194392016-12-01 Preparation of the femoral bone cavity in cementless stems: broaching versus compaction: A 5-year randomized radiostereometric and dual X-ray absorptiometry study of 40 bilateral 1-stage operations Hjorth, Mette H Stilling, Maiken Søballe, Kjeld Nielsen, Poul Torben Christensen, Poul H Kold, Søren Acta Orthop Articles Background and purpose — Short-term experimental studies have confirmed that there is superior fixation of cementless implants inserted with compaction compared to broaching of the cancellous bone. Patients and methods — 1-stage, bilateral primary THA was performed in 28 patients between May 2001 and September 2007. The patients were randomized to femoral bone preparation with broaching on 1 side and compaction on the other side. 8 patients declined to attend the postoperative follow-up, leaving 20 patients (13 male) with a mean age of 58 (36–70) years for evaluation. The patients were followed with radiostereometric analysis (RSA) at baseline, at 6 and 12 weeks, and at 1, 2, and 5 years, and measurements of periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) at baseline and at 1, 2, and 5 years. The subjective part of the Harris hip score (HHS) and details of complications throughout the observation period were obtained at a mean interval of 6.3 (3.0–9.5) years after surgery. Results — Femoral stems in the compaction group had a higher degree of medio-lateral migration (0.21 mm, 95% CI: 0.03–0.40) than femoral stems in the broaching group at 5 years (p = 0.02). No other significant differences in translations or rotations were found between the 2 surgical techniques at 2 years (p > 0.4) and 5 years (p > 0.7) postoperatively. There were no individual stems with continuous migration. Periprosthetic BMD in the 7 Gruen zones was similar at 2 years and at 5 years. Intraoperative femoral fractures occurred in 2 of 20 compacted hips, but there were none in the 20 broached hips. The HHS and dislocations were similar in the 2 groups at 6.3 (3.0–9.5) years after surgery. Interpretation — Bone compaction as a surgical technique with the Bi-Metric stem did not show the superior outcomes expected compared to conventional broaching. Furthermore, 2 periprosthetic fractures occurred using the compaction technique, so we cannot recommend compaction for insertion of the cementless Bi-Metric stem. Taylor & Francis 2016-12 2016-10-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5119439/ /pubmed/27759486 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1244958 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0)
spellingShingle Articles
Hjorth, Mette H
Stilling, Maiken
Søballe, Kjeld
Nielsen, Poul Torben
Christensen, Poul H
Kold, Søren
Preparation of the femoral bone cavity in cementless stems: broaching versus compaction: A 5-year randomized radiostereometric and dual X-ray absorptiometry study of 40 bilateral 1-stage operations
title Preparation of the femoral bone cavity in cementless stems: broaching versus compaction: A 5-year randomized radiostereometric and dual X-ray absorptiometry study of 40 bilateral 1-stage operations
title_full Preparation of the femoral bone cavity in cementless stems: broaching versus compaction: A 5-year randomized radiostereometric and dual X-ray absorptiometry study of 40 bilateral 1-stage operations
title_fullStr Preparation of the femoral bone cavity in cementless stems: broaching versus compaction: A 5-year randomized radiostereometric and dual X-ray absorptiometry study of 40 bilateral 1-stage operations
title_full_unstemmed Preparation of the femoral bone cavity in cementless stems: broaching versus compaction: A 5-year randomized radiostereometric and dual X-ray absorptiometry study of 40 bilateral 1-stage operations
title_short Preparation of the femoral bone cavity in cementless stems: broaching versus compaction: A 5-year randomized radiostereometric and dual X-ray absorptiometry study of 40 bilateral 1-stage operations
title_sort preparation of the femoral bone cavity in cementless stems: broaching versus compaction: a 5-year randomized radiostereometric and dual x-ray absorptiometry study of 40 bilateral 1-stage operations
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5119439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27759486
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1244958
work_keys_str_mv AT hjorthmetteh preparationofthefemoralbonecavityincementlessstemsbroachingversuscompactiona5yearrandomizedradiostereometricanddualxrayabsorptiometrystudyof40bilateral1stageoperations
AT stillingmaiken preparationofthefemoralbonecavityincementlessstemsbroachingversuscompactiona5yearrandomizedradiostereometricanddualxrayabsorptiometrystudyof40bilateral1stageoperations
AT søballekjeld preparationofthefemoralbonecavityincementlessstemsbroachingversuscompactiona5yearrandomizedradiostereometricanddualxrayabsorptiometrystudyof40bilateral1stageoperations
AT nielsenpoultorben preparationofthefemoralbonecavityincementlessstemsbroachingversuscompactiona5yearrandomizedradiostereometricanddualxrayabsorptiometrystudyof40bilateral1stageoperations
AT christensenpoulh preparationofthefemoralbonecavityincementlessstemsbroachingversuscompactiona5yearrandomizedradiostereometricanddualxrayabsorptiometrystudyof40bilateral1stageoperations
AT koldsøren preparationofthefemoralbonecavityincementlessstemsbroachingversuscompactiona5yearrandomizedradiostereometricanddualxrayabsorptiometrystudyof40bilateral1stageoperations