Cargando…

Survivorship and relative risk of revision in computer-navigated versus conventional total knee replacement at 8-year follow-up: A study of 23,684 cases reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 2005–2014

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The long-term effects of computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement (CAS) compared to conventionally operated knee replacement (CON) are still not clear. We compared survivorship and relative risk of revision in CAS and CON based on data from the Norwegian Arthroplas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dyrhovden, Gro S, Fenstad, Anne M, Furnes, Ove, Gøthesen, Øystein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5119442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27775460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1244884
_version_ 1782469093721374720
author Dyrhovden, Gro S
Fenstad, Anne M
Furnes, Ove
Gøthesen, Øystein
author_facet Dyrhovden, Gro S
Fenstad, Anne M
Furnes, Ove
Gøthesen, Øystein
author_sort Dyrhovden, Gro S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The long-term effects of computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement (CAS) compared to conventionally operated knee replacement (CON) are still not clear. We compared survivorship and relative risk of revision in CAS and CON based on data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed primary total knee replacements without patellar resurfacing reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 2005 through 2014. The 5 most used implants and the 3 most common navigation systems were included. The groups (CAS, n = 3,665; CON, n = 20,019) were compared using a Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, ASA category, prosthesis brand, fixation method, previous surgery, and diagnosis with the risk of revision for any reason as endpoint. Secondary outcomes were reasons for revision and effects of prosthesis brand, fixation method, age (± 65 years), and hospital volume. RESULTS: Prosthesis survival and risk of revision were similar for CAS and CON. CAS had significantly fewer revisions due to malalignment. Otherwise, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups in analyses of secondary outcomes. Mean operating time was 13 minutes longer in CAS. INTERPRETATION: At 8 years of follow-up, CAS and CON had similar rates of overall revision, but CAS had fewer revisions due to malalignment. According to our findings, the benefits of CAS at medium-term follow-up are limited. Further research may identify subgroups that benefit from CAS, and it should also emphasize patient-reported outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5119442
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Taylor & Francis
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51194422016-12-01 Survivorship and relative risk of revision in computer-navigated versus conventional total knee replacement at 8-year follow-up: A study of 23,684 cases reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 2005–2014 Dyrhovden, Gro S Fenstad, Anne M Furnes, Ove Gøthesen, Øystein Acta Orthop Articles BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The long-term effects of computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement (CAS) compared to conventionally operated knee replacement (CON) are still not clear. We compared survivorship and relative risk of revision in CAS and CON based on data from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We assessed primary total knee replacements without patellar resurfacing reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register from 2005 through 2014. The 5 most used implants and the 3 most common navigation systems were included. The groups (CAS, n = 3,665; CON, n = 20,019) were compared using a Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, ASA category, prosthesis brand, fixation method, previous surgery, and diagnosis with the risk of revision for any reason as endpoint. Secondary outcomes were reasons for revision and effects of prosthesis brand, fixation method, age (± 65 years), and hospital volume. RESULTS: Prosthesis survival and risk of revision were similar for CAS and CON. CAS had significantly fewer revisions due to malalignment. Otherwise, no statistically significant difference was found between the groups in analyses of secondary outcomes. Mean operating time was 13 minutes longer in CAS. INTERPRETATION: At 8 years of follow-up, CAS and CON had similar rates of overall revision, but CAS had fewer revisions due to malalignment. According to our findings, the benefits of CAS at medium-term follow-up are limited. Further research may identify subgroups that benefit from CAS, and it should also emphasize patient-reported outcomes. Taylor & Francis 2016-12 2016-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5119442/ /pubmed/27775460 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1244884 Text en © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Nordic Orthopedic Federation. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0)
spellingShingle Articles
Dyrhovden, Gro S
Fenstad, Anne M
Furnes, Ove
Gøthesen, Øystein
Survivorship and relative risk of revision in computer-navigated versus conventional total knee replacement at 8-year follow-up: A study of 23,684 cases reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 2005–2014
title Survivorship and relative risk of revision in computer-navigated versus conventional total knee replacement at 8-year follow-up: A study of 23,684 cases reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 2005–2014
title_full Survivorship and relative risk of revision in computer-navigated versus conventional total knee replacement at 8-year follow-up: A study of 23,684 cases reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 2005–2014
title_fullStr Survivorship and relative risk of revision in computer-navigated versus conventional total knee replacement at 8-year follow-up: A study of 23,684 cases reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 2005–2014
title_full_unstemmed Survivorship and relative risk of revision in computer-navigated versus conventional total knee replacement at 8-year follow-up: A study of 23,684 cases reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 2005–2014
title_short Survivorship and relative risk of revision in computer-navigated versus conventional total knee replacement at 8-year follow-up: A study of 23,684 cases reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register, 2005–2014
title_sort survivorship and relative risk of revision in computer-navigated versus conventional total knee replacement at 8-year follow-up: a study of 23,684 cases reported to the norwegian arthroplasty register, 2005–2014
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5119442/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27775460
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17453674.2016.1244884
work_keys_str_mv AT dyrhovdengros survivorshipandrelativeriskofrevisionincomputernavigatedversusconventionaltotalkneereplacementat8yearfollowupastudyof23684casesreportedtothenorwegianarthroplastyregister20052014
AT fenstadannem survivorshipandrelativeriskofrevisionincomputernavigatedversusconventionaltotalkneereplacementat8yearfollowupastudyof23684casesreportedtothenorwegianarthroplastyregister20052014
AT furnesove survivorshipandrelativeriskofrevisionincomputernavigatedversusconventionaltotalkneereplacementat8yearfollowupastudyof23684casesreportedtothenorwegianarthroplastyregister20052014
AT gøthesenøystein survivorshipandrelativeriskofrevisionincomputernavigatedversusconventionaltotalkneereplacementat8yearfollowupastudyof23684casesreportedtothenorwegianarthroplastyregister20052014