Cargando…

Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Recent trials have assessed the efficacy and safety of novel monoclonal antibodies such as reslizumab and benralizumab. However, the overall efficacy and safety anti—interleukin (IL) 5 treatment in asthma have not been thoroughly assessed. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Fa-Ping, Liu, Ting, Lan, Zhu, Li, Su-Yun, Mao, Hui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5119789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27875559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166833
_version_ 1782469120629932032
author Wang, Fa-Ping
Liu, Ting
Lan, Zhu
Li, Su-Yun
Mao, Hui
author_facet Wang, Fa-Ping
Liu, Ting
Lan, Zhu
Li, Su-Yun
Mao, Hui
author_sort Wang, Fa-Ping
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent trials have assessed the efficacy and safety of novel monoclonal antibodies such as reslizumab and benralizumab. However, the overall efficacy and safety anti—interleukin (IL) 5 treatment in asthma have not been thoroughly assessed. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-IL-5 treatment on patients with asthma published up to October 2016 in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) that reported pulmonary function, quality of life scores, asthmatic exacerbation rate, blood and sputum eosinophil counts, short-acting β-agonist (SABA) rescue use, and adverse events were included. The pooled mean difference, and relative risks (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Twenty studies involving 7100 patients were identified. Pooled analysis revealed significant improvements in FEV(1) (first second forced expiratory volume) (MD = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.06–0.12, I(2) = 10%), FEV(1)% (MD = 3.75, 95% CI: 1.66–5.83, I(2) = 19%), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score (MD = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.15–0.30, I(2) = 0%), decreased blood, sputum eosinophils and asthmatic exacerbation (RR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.59–0.73, I(2) = 51%); peak expiratory flow (PEF) (MD = 5.45, 95% CI: -2.83–13.72, I(2) = 0%), histamine PC(20) (MD = -0.62, 95% CI: -1.92–0.68, I(2) = 0%) or SABA rescue use (MD = -0.11, 95% CI: -0.3–0.07, I(2) = 30%) were unaffected; adverse events were not increased (RR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89–0.98, I(2) = 46%). No publication bias was observed (Egger's P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-interleukin 5 monoclonal therapies for asthma could be safe for slightly improving FEV(1) (or FEV(1)% of predicted value), quality of life, and reducing exacerbations risk and blood and sputum eosinophils, but have no significant effect on PEF, histamine PC20, and SABA rescue use. Further trials required to establish to clarify the optimal antibody for different patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5119789
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51197892016-12-15 Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wang, Fa-Ping Liu, Ting Lan, Zhu Li, Su-Yun Mao, Hui PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Recent trials have assessed the efficacy and safety of novel monoclonal antibodies such as reslizumab and benralizumab. However, the overall efficacy and safety anti—interleukin (IL) 5 treatment in asthma have not been thoroughly assessed. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-IL-5 treatment on patients with asthma published up to October 2016 in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) that reported pulmonary function, quality of life scores, asthmatic exacerbation rate, blood and sputum eosinophil counts, short-acting β-agonist (SABA) rescue use, and adverse events were included. The pooled mean difference, and relative risks (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Twenty studies involving 7100 patients were identified. Pooled analysis revealed significant improvements in FEV(1) (first second forced expiratory volume) (MD = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.06–0.12, I(2) = 10%), FEV(1)% (MD = 3.75, 95% CI: 1.66–5.83, I(2) = 19%), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score (MD = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.15–0.30, I(2) = 0%), decreased blood, sputum eosinophils and asthmatic exacerbation (RR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.59–0.73, I(2) = 51%); peak expiratory flow (PEF) (MD = 5.45, 95% CI: -2.83–13.72, I(2) = 0%), histamine PC(20) (MD = -0.62, 95% CI: -1.92–0.68, I(2) = 0%) or SABA rescue use (MD = -0.11, 95% CI: -0.3–0.07, I(2) = 30%) were unaffected; adverse events were not increased (RR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89–0.98, I(2) = 46%). No publication bias was observed (Egger's P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-interleukin 5 monoclonal therapies for asthma could be safe for slightly improving FEV(1) (or FEV(1)% of predicted value), quality of life, and reducing exacerbations risk and blood and sputum eosinophils, but have no significant effect on PEF, histamine PC20, and SABA rescue use. Further trials required to establish to clarify the optimal antibody for different patients. Public Library of Science 2016-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5119789/ /pubmed/27875559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166833 Text en © 2016 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wang, Fa-Ping
Liu, Ting
Lan, Zhu
Li, Su-Yun
Mao, Hui
Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin-5 therapy in patients with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5119789/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27875559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166833
work_keys_str_mv AT wangfaping efficacyandsafetyofantiinterleukin5therapyinpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuting efficacyandsafetyofantiinterleukin5therapyinpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lanzhu efficacyandsafetyofantiinterleukin5therapyinpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lisuyun efficacyandsafetyofantiinterleukin5therapyinpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT maohui efficacyandsafetyofantiinterleukin5therapyinpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis