Cargando…
Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Recent trials have assessed the efficacy and safety of novel monoclonal antibodies such as reslizumab and benralizumab. However, the overall efficacy and safety anti—interleukin (IL) 5 treatment in asthma have not been thoroughly assessed. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5119789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27875559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166833 |
_version_ | 1782469120629932032 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Fa-Ping Liu, Ting Lan, Zhu Li, Su-Yun Mao, Hui |
author_facet | Wang, Fa-Ping Liu, Ting Lan, Zhu Li, Su-Yun Mao, Hui |
author_sort | Wang, Fa-Ping |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Recent trials have assessed the efficacy and safety of novel monoclonal antibodies such as reslizumab and benralizumab. However, the overall efficacy and safety anti—interleukin (IL) 5 treatment in asthma have not been thoroughly assessed. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-IL-5 treatment on patients with asthma published up to October 2016 in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) that reported pulmonary function, quality of life scores, asthmatic exacerbation rate, blood and sputum eosinophil counts, short-acting β-agonist (SABA) rescue use, and adverse events were included. The pooled mean difference, and relative risks (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Twenty studies involving 7100 patients were identified. Pooled analysis revealed significant improvements in FEV(1) (first second forced expiratory volume) (MD = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.06–0.12, I(2) = 10%), FEV(1)% (MD = 3.75, 95% CI: 1.66–5.83, I(2) = 19%), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score (MD = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.15–0.30, I(2) = 0%), decreased blood, sputum eosinophils and asthmatic exacerbation (RR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.59–0.73, I(2) = 51%); peak expiratory flow (PEF) (MD = 5.45, 95% CI: -2.83–13.72, I(2) = 0%), histamine PC(20) (MD = -0.62, 95% CI: -1.92–0.68, I(2) = 0%) or SABA rescue use (MD = -0.11, 95% CI: -0.3–0.07, I(2) = 30%) were unaffected; adverse events were not increased (RR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89–0.98, I(2) = 46%). No publication bias was observed (Egger's P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-interleukin 5 monoclonal therapies for asthma could be safe for slightly improving FEV(1) (or FEV(1)% of predicted value), quality of life, and reducing exacerbations risk and blood and sputum eosinophils, but have no significant effect on PEF, histamine PC20, and SABA rescue use. Further trials required to establish to clarify the optimal antibody for different patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5119789 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51197892016-12-15 Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wang, Fa-Ping Liu, Ting Lan, Zhu Li, Su-Yun Mao, Hui PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Recent trials have assessed the efficacy and safety of novel monoclonal antibodies such as reslizumab and benralizumab. However, the overall efficacy and safety anti—interleukin (IL) 5 treatment in asthma have not been thoroughly assessed. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-IL-5 treatment on patients with asthma published up to October 2016 in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) that reported pulmonary function, quality of life scores, asthmatic exacerbation rate, blood and sputum eosinophil counts, short-acting β-agonist (SABA) rescue use, and adverse events were included. The pooled mean difference, and relative risks (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Twenty studies involving 7100 patients were identified. Pooled analysis revealed significant improvements in FEV(1) (first second forced expiratory volume) (MD = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.06–0.12, I(2) = 10%), FEV(1)% (MD = 3.75, 95% CI: 1.66–5.83, I(2) = 19%), Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) score (MD = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.15–0.30, I(2) = 0%), decreased blood, sputum eosinophils and asthmatic exacerbation (RR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.59–0.73, I(2) = 51%); peak expiratory flow (PEF) (MD = 5.45, 95% CI: -2.83–13.72, I(2) = 0%), histamine PC(20) (MD = -0.62, 95% CI: -1.92–0.68, I(2) = 0%) or SABA rescue use (MD = -0.11, 95% CI: -0.3–0.07, I(2) = 30%) were unaffected; adverse events were not increased (RR = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.89–0.98, I(2) = 46%). No publication bias was observed (Egger's P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Anti-interleukin 5 monoclonal therapies for asthma could be safe for slightly improving FEV(1) (or FEV(1)% of predicted value), quality of life, and reducing exacerbations risk and blood and sputum eosinophils, but have no significant effect on PEF, histamine PC20, and SABA rescue use. Further trials required to establish to clarify the optimal antibody for different patients. Public Library of Science 2016-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5119789/ /pubmed/27875559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166833 Text en © 2016 Wang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wang, Fa-Ping Liu, Ting Lan, Zhu Li, Su-Yun Mao, Hui Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Interleukin-5 Therapy in Patients with Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of anti-interleukin-5 therapy in patients with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5119789/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27875559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166833 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangfaping efficacyandsafetyofantiinterleukin5therapyinpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuting efficacyandsafetyofantiinterleukin5therapyinpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lanzhu efficacyandsafetyofantiinterleukin5therapyinpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lisuyun efficacyandsafetyofantiinterleukin5therapyinpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT maohui efficacyandsafetyofantiinterleukin5therapyinpatientswithasthmaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |