Cargando…
A phase I trial of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with metastatic melanoma
Epigenetic alterations by histone/protein deacetylases (HDACs) are one of the many mechanisms that cancer cells use to alter gene expression and promote growth. HDAC inhibitors have proven to be effective in the treatment of specific malignancies, particularly in combination with other anticancer ag...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5119958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27748045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.862 |
_version_ | 1782469148122546176 |
---|---|
author | Ibrahim, Nageatte Buchbinder, Elizabeth I. Granter, Scott R. Rodig, Scott J. Giobbie‐Hurder, Anita Becerra, Carla Tsiaras, Argyro Gjini, Evisa Fisher, David E. Hodi, F. Stephen |
author_facet | Ibrahim, Nageatte Buchbinder, Elizabeth I. Granter, Scott R. Rodig, Scott J. Giobbie‐Hurder, Anita Becerra, Carla Tsiaras, Argyro Gjini, Evisa Fisher, David E. Hodi, F. Stephen |
author_sort | Ibrahim, Nageatte |
collection | PubMed |
description | Epigenetic alterations by histone/protein deacetylases (HDACs) are one of the many mechanisms that cancer cells use to alter gene expression and promote growth. HDAC inhibitors have proven to be effective in the treatment of specific malignancies, particularly in combination with other anticancer agents. We conducted a phase I trial of panobinostat in patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. Patients were treated with oral panobinostat at a dose of 30 mg daily on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays (Arm A). Three of the six patients on this dose experienced clinically significant thrombocytopenia requiring dose interruption. Due to this, a second treatment arm was opened and the dose was changed to 30 mg oral panobinostat three times a week every other week (Arm B). Six patients were treated on Arm A and 10 patients were enrolled to Arm B with nine patients treated. In nine patients treated on Arm B, the response rate was 0% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 0–28%) and the disease‐control rate was 22% (90% CI: 4–55%). Among all 15 patients treated, the overall response rate was 0% (90% CI: 0–17%) and the disease‐control rate was 27% (90% CI: 10–51%). There was a high rate of toxicity associated with treatment. Correlative studies suggest the presence of immune modifications after HDAC inhibition. Panobinostat is not active as a single agent in the treatment of melanoma. Further exploration of this agent in combination with other therapies may be warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5119958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51199582016-11-28 A phase I trial of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with metastatic melanoma Ibrahim, Nageatte Buchbinder, Elizabeth I. Granter, Scott R. Rodig, Scott J. Giobbie‐Hurder, Anita Becerra, Carla Tsiaras, Argyro Gjini, Evisa Fisher, David E. Hodi, F. Stephen Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research Epigenetic alterations by histone/protein deacetylases (HDACs) are one of the many mechanisms that cancer cells use to alter gene expression and promote growth. HDAC inhibitors have proven to be effective in the treatment of specific malignancies, particularly in combination with other anticancer agents. We conducted a phase I trial of panobinostat in patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma. Patients were treated with oral panobinostat at a dose of 30 mg daily on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays (Arm A). Three of the six patients on this dose experienced clinically significant thrombocytopenia requiring dose interruption. Due to this, a second treatment arm was opened and the dose was changed to 30 mg oral panobinostat three times a week every other week (Arm B). Six patients were treated on Arm A and 10 patients were enrolled to Arm B with nine patients treated. In nine patients treated on Arm B, the response rate was 0% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 0–28%) and the disease‐control rate was 22% (90% CI: 4–55%). Among all 15 patients treated, the overall response rate was 0% (90% CI: 0–17%) and the disease‐control rate was 27% (90% CI: 10–51%). There was a high rate of toxicity associated with treatment. Correlative studies suggest the presence of immune modifications after HDAC inhibition. Panobinostat is not active as a single agent in the treatment of melanoma. Further exploration of this agent in combination with other therapies may be warranted. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-10-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5119958/ /pubmed/27748045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.862 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Ibrahim, Nageatte Buchbinder, Elizabeth I. Granter, Scott R. Rodig, Scott J. Giobbie‐Hurder, Anita Becerra, Carla Tsiaras, Argyro Gjini, Evisa Fisher, David E. Hodi, F. Stephen A phase I trial of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with metastatic melanoma |
title | A phase I trial of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with metastatic melanoma |
title_full | A phase I trial of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with metastatic melanoma |
title_fullStr | A phase I trial of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with metastatic melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed | A phase I trial of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with metastatic melanoma |
title_short | A phase I trial of panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with metastatic melanoma |
title_sort | phase i trial of panobinostat (lbh589) in patients with metastatic melanoma |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5119958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27748045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.862 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ibrahimnageatte aphaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT buchbinderelizabethi aphaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT granterscottr aphaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT rodigscottj aphaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT giobbiehurderanita aphaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT becerracarla aphaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT tsiarasargyro aphaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT gjinievisa aphaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT fisherdavide aphaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT hodifstephen aphaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT ibrahimnageatte phaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT buchbinderelizabethi phaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT granterscottr phaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT rodigscottj phaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT giobbiehurderanita phaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT becerracarla phaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT tsiarasargyro phaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT gjinievisa phaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT fisherdavide phaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma AT hodifstephen phaseitrialofpanobinostatlbh589inpatientswithmetastaticmelanoma |