Cargando…

Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking

Research on neural mechanisms of attention has generally instructed subjects to direct attention covertly while maintaining a fixed gaze. This study combined simultaneous eye tracking and electroencephalogram (EEG) to measure neural attention responses during exogenous cueing in overt attention shif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kulke, Louisa V., Atkinson, Janette, Braddick, Oliver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27932962
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00592
_version_ 1782469176805294080
author Kulke, Louisa V.
Atkinson, Janette
Braddick, Oliver
author_facet Kulke, Louisa V.
Atkinson, Janette
Braddick, Oliver
author_sort Kulke, Louisa V.
collection PubMed
description Research on neural mechanisms of attention has generally instructed subjects to direct attention covertly while maintaining a fixed gaze. This study combined simultaneous eye tracking and electroencephalogram (EEG) to measure neural attention responses during exogenous cueing in overt attention shifts (with saccadic eye movements to a target) and compared these with covert attention shifts (responding manually while maintaining central fixation). EEG analysis of the period preceding the saccade latency showed similar occipital response amplitudes for overt and covert shifts, although response latencies differed. However, a frontal positivity was greater during covert attention shifts, possibly reflecting saccade inhibition to maintain fixation. The results show that combined EEG and eye tracking can be successfully used to study natural overt shifts of attention (applicable to non-verbal infants) and that requiring inhibition of saccades can lead to additional frontal responses. Such data can be used to refine current neural models of attention that have been mainly based on covert shifts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5120114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51201142016-12-08 Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking Kulke, Louisa V. Atkinson, Janette Braddick, Oliver Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Research on neural mechanisms of attention has generally instructed subjects to direct attention covertly while maintaining a fixed gaze. This study combined simultaneous eye tracking and electroencephalogram (EEG) to measure neural attention responses during exogenous cueing in overt attention shifts (with saccadic eye movements to a target) and compared these with covert attention shifts (responding manually while maintaining central fixation). EEG analysis of the period preceding the saccade latency showed similar occipital response amplitudes for overt and covert shifts, although response latencies differed. However, a frontal positivity was greater during covert attention shifts, possibly reflecting saccade inhibition to maintain fixation. The results show that combined EEG and eye tracking can be successfully used to study natural overt shifts of attention (applicable to non-verbal infants) and that requiring inhibition of saccades can lead to additional frontal responses. Such data can be used to refine current neural models of attention that have been mainly based on covert shifts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5120114/ /pubmed/27932962 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00592 Text en Copyright © 2016 Kulke, Atkinson and Braddick. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kulke, Louisa V.
Atkinson, Janette
Braddick, Oliver
Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking
title Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking
title_full Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking
title_fullStr Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking
title_full_unstemmed Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking
title_short Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking
title_sort neural differences between covert and overt attention studied using eeg with simultaneous remote eye tracking
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27932962
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00592
work_keys_str_mv AT kulkelouisav neuraldifferencesbetweencovertandovertattentionstudiedusingeegwithsimultaneousremoteeyetracking
AT atkinsonjanette neuraldifferencesbetweencovertandovertattentionstudiedusingeegwithsimultaneousremoteeyetracking
AT braddickoliver neuraldifferencesbetweencovertandovertattentionstudiedusingeegwithsimultaneousremoteeyetracking