Cargando…
Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking
Research on neural mechanisms of attention has generally instructed subjects to direct attention covertly while maintaining a fixed gaze. This study combined simultaneous eye tracking and electroencephalogram (EEG) to measure neural attention responses during exogenous cueing in overt attention shif...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27932962 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00592 |
_version_ | 1782469176805294080 |
---|---|
author | Kulke, Louisa V. Atkinson, Janette Braddick, Oliver |
author_facet | Kulke, Louisa V. Atkinson, Janette Braddick, Oliver |
author_sort | Kulke, Louisa V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research on neural mechanisms of attention has generally instructed subjects to direct attention covertly while maintaining a fixed gaze. This study combined simultaneous eye tracking and electroencephalogram (EEG) to measure neural attention responses during exogenous cueing in overt attention shifts (with saccadic eye movements to a target) and compared these with covert attention shifts (responding manually while maintaining central fixation). EEG analysis of the period preceding the saccade latency showed similar occipital response amplitudes for overt and covert shifts, although response latencies differed. However, a frontal positivity was greater during covert attention shifts, possibly reflecting saccade inhibition to maintain fixation. The results show that combined EEG and eye tracking can be successfully used to study natural overt shifts of attention (applicable to non-verbal infants) and that requiring inhibition of saccades can lead to additional frontal responses. Such data can be used to refine current neural models of attention that have been mainly based on covert shifts. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5120114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51201142016-12-08 Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking Kulke, Louisa V. Atkinson, Janette Braddick, Oliver Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Research on neural mechanisms of attention has generally instructed subjects to direct attention covertly while maintaining a fixed gaze. This study combined simultaneous eye tracking and electroencephalogram (EEG) to measure neural attention responses during exogenous cueing in overt attention shifts (with saccadic eye movements to a target) and compared these with covert attention shifts (responding manually while maintaining central fixation). EEG analysis of the period preceding the saccade latency showed similar occipital response amplitudes for overt and covert shifts, although response latencies differed. However, a frontal positivity was greater during covert attention shifts, possibly reflecting saccade inhibition to maintain fixation. The results show that combined EEG and eye tracking can be successfully used to study natural overt shifts of attention (applicable to non-verbal infants) and that requiring inhibition of saccades can lead to additional frontal responses. Such data can be used to refine current neural models of attention that have been mainly based on covert shifts. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5120114/ /pubmed/27932962 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00592 Text en Copyright © 2016 Kulke, Atkinson and Braddick. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution and reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Kulke, Louisa V. Atkinson, Janette Braddick, Oliver Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking |
title | Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking |
title_full | Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking |
title_fullStr | Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking |
title_full_unstemmed | Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking |
title_short | Neural Differences between Covert and Overt Attention Studied using EEG with Simultaneous Remote Eye Tracking |
title_sort | neural differences between covert and overt attention studied using eeg with simultaneous remote eye tracking |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27932962 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00592 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kulkelouisav neuraldifferencesbetweencovertandovertattentionstudiedusingeegwithsimultaneousremoteeyetracking AT atkinsonjanette neuraldifferencesbetweencovertandovertattentionstudiedusingeegwithsimultaneousremoteeyetracking AT braddickoliver neuraldifferencesbetweencovertandovertattentionstudiedusingeegwithsimultaneousremoteeyetracking |