Cargando…
Accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement
Blood pressure (BP) monitors rely on pulse detection. Some blood pressure monitors use pulse timings to analyse pulse interval variability for arrhythmia screening, but this assumes that the pulse interval timings detected from BP cuffs are accurate compared with RR intervals derived from ECG. In th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27876841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37472 |
_version_ | 1782469214887477248 |
---|---|
author | Kane, Sarah A. Blake, James R. McArdle, Frank J. Langley, Philip Sims, Andrew J. |
author_facet | Kane, Sarah A. Blake, James R. McArdle, Frank J. Langley, Philip Sims, Andrew J. |
author_sort | Kane, Sarah A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Blood pressure (BP) monitors rely on pulse detection. Some blood pressure monitors use pulse timings to analyse pulse interval variability for arrhythmia screening, but this assumes that the pulse interval timings detected from BP cuffs are accurate compared with RR intervals derived from ECG. In this study we compared the accuracy of pulse intervals detected using an ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) with single lead ECG. Twenty participants wore an ABPM for three hours and a data logger which synchronously measured cuff pressure and ECG. RR intervals were compared with corresponding intervals derived from the cuff pressure tracings using three different pulse landmarks. Linear mixed effects models were used to assess differences between ECG and cuff pressure timings and to investigate the effect of potential covariates. In addition, the maximum number of successive oscillometric beats detectable in a measurement was assessed. From 243 BP measurements, the landmark at the foot of the oscillometric pulse was found to be associated with fewest covariates and had a random error of 9.5 ms. 99% of the cuff pressure recordings had more than 10 successive detectable oscillometric beats. RR intervals can be accurately estimated using an ABPM. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5120306 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51203062016-11-28 Accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement Kane, Sarah A. Blake, James R. McArdle, Frank J. Langley, Philip Sims, Andrew J. Sci Rep Article Blood pressure (BP) monitors rely on pulse detection. Some blood pressure monitors use pulse timings to analyse pulse interval variability for arrhythmia screening, but this assumes that the pulse interval timings detected from BP cuffs are accurate compared with RR intervals derived from ECG. In this study we compared the accuracy of pulse intervals detected using an ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) with single lead ECG. Twenty participants wore an ABPM for three hours and a data logger which synchronously measured cuff pressure and ECG. RR intervals were compared with corresponding intervals derived from the cuff pressure tracings using three different pulse landmarks. Linear mixed effects models were used to assess differences between ECG and cuff pressure timings and to investigate the effect of potential covariates. In addition, the maximum number of successive oscillometric beats detectable in a measurement was assessed. From 243 BP measurements, the landmark at the foot of the oscillometric pulse was found to be associated with fewest covariates and had a random error of 9.5 ms. 99% of the cuff pressure recordings had more than 10 successive detectable oscillometric beats. RR intervals can be accurately estimated using an ABPM. Nature Publishing Group 2016-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5120306/ /pubmed/27876841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37472 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Article Kane, Sarah A. Blake, James R. McArdle, Frank J. Langley, Philip Sims, Andrew J. Accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement |
title | Accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement |
title_full | Accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement |
title_short | Accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement |
title_sort | accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27876841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37472 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kanesaraha accuracyofpulseintervaltiminginambulatorybloodpressuremeasurement AT blakejamesr accuracyofpulseintervaltiminginambulatorybloodpressuremeasurement AT mcardlefrankj accuracyofpulseintervaltiminginambulatorybloodpressuremeasurement AT langleyphilip accuracyofpulseintervaltiminginambulatorybloodpressuremeasurement AT simsandrewj accuracyofpulseintervaltiminginambulatorybloodpressuremeasurement |