Cargando…

Accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement

Blood pressure (BP) monitors rely on pulse detection. Some blood pressure monitors use pulse timings to analyse pulse interval variability for arrhythmia screening, but this assumes that the pulse interval timings detected from BP cuffs are accurate compared with RR intervals derived from ECG. In th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kane, Sarah A., Blake, James R., McArdle, Frank J., Langley, Philip, Sims, Andrew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27876841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37472
_version_ 1782469214887477248
author Kane, Sarah A.
Blake, James R.
McArdle, Frank J.
Langley, Philip
Sims, Andrew J.
author_facet Kane, Sarah A.
Blake, James R.
McArdle, Frank J.
Langley, Philip
Sims, Andrew J.
author_sort Kane, Sarah A.
collection PubMed
description Blood pressure (BP) monitors rely on pulse detection. Some blood pressure monitors use pulse timings to analyse pulse interval variability for arrhythmia screening, but this assumes that the pulse interval timings detected from BP cuffs are accurate compared with RR intervals derived from ECG. In this study we compared the accuracy of pulse intervals detected using an ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) with single lead ECG. Twenty participants wore an ABPM for three hours and a data logger which synchronously measured cuff pressure and ECG. RR intervals were compared with corresponding intervals derived from the cuff pressure tracings using three different pulse landmarks. Linear mixed effects models were used to assess differences between ECG and cuff pressure timings and to investigate the effect of potential covariates. In addition, the maximum number of successive oscillometric beats detectable in a measurement was assessed. From 243 BP measurements, the landmark at the foot of the oscillometric pulse was found to be associated with fewest covariates and had a random error of 9.5 ms. 99% of the cuff pressure recordings had more than 10 successive detectable oscillometric beats. RR intervals can be accurately estimated using an ABPM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5120306
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51203062016-11-28 Accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement Kane, Sarah A. Blake, James R. McArdle, Frank J. Langley, Philip Sims, Andrew J. Sci Rep Article Blood pressure (BP) monitors rely on pulse detection. Some blood pressure monitors use pulse timings to analyse pulse interval variability for arrhythmia screening, but this assumes that the pulse interval timings detected from BP cuffs are accurate compared with RR intervals derived from ECG. In this study we compared the accuracy of pulse intervals detected using an ambulatory blood pressure monitor (ABPM) with single lead ECG. Twenty participants wore an ABPM for three hours and a data logger which synchronously measured cuff pressure and ECG. RR intervals were compared with corresponding intervals derived from the cuff pressure tracings using three different pulse landmarks. Linear mixed effects models were used to assess differences between ECG and cuff pressure timings and to investigate the effect of potential covariates. In addition, the maximum number of successive oscillometric beats detectable in a measurement was assessed. From 243 BP measurements, the landmark at the foot of the oscillometric pulse was found to be associated with fewest covariates and had a random error of 9.5 ms. 99% of the cuff pressure recordings had more than 10 successive detectable oscillometric beats. RR intervals can be accurately estimated using an ABPM. Nature Publishing Group 2016-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5120306/ /pubmed/27876841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37472 Text en Copyright © 2016, The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Article
Kane, Sarah A.
Blake, James R.
McArdle, Frank J.
Langley, Philip
Sims, Andrew J.
Accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement
title Accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement
title_full Accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement
title_fullStr Accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement
title_short Accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement
title_sort accuracy of pulse interval timing in ambulatory blood pressure measurement
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120306/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27876841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep37472
work_keys_str_mv AT kanesaraha accuracyofpulseintervaltiminginambulatorybloodpressuremeasurement
AT blakejamesr accuracyofpulseintervaltiminginambulatorybloodpressuremeasurement
AT mcardlefrankj accuracyofpulseintervaltiminginambulatorybloodpressuremeasurement
AT langleyphilip accuracyofpulseintervaltiminginambulatorybloodpressuremeasurement
AT simsandrewj accuracyofpulseintervaltiminginambulatorybloodpressuremeasurement