Cargando…
A trial to determine whether septic shock-reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy versus usual care (SQUEEZE): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Current pediatric septic shock resuscitation guidelines from the American College of Critical Care Medicine focus on the early and goal-directed administration of intravascular fluid followed by vasoactive medication infusions for persistent and fluid-refractory shock. However, accumulat...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27876084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1689-2 |
_version_ | 1782469242016235520 |
---|---|
author | Parker, Melissa J. Thabane, Lehana Fox-Robichaud, Alison Liaw, Patricia Choong, Karen |
author_facet | Parker, Melissa J. Thabane, Lehana Fox-Robichaud, Alison Liaw, Patricia Choong, Karen |
author_sort | Parker, Melissa J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Current pediatric septic shock resuscitation guidelines from the American College of Critical Care Medicine focus on the early and goal-directed administration of intravascular fluid followed by vasoactive medication infusions for persistent and fluid-refractory shock. However, accumulating adult and pediatric data suggest that excessive fluid administration is associated with worse patient outcomes and even increased risk of death. The optimal amount of intravascular fluid required in early pediatric septic shock resuscitation prior to the initiation of vasoactive support remains unanswered. METHODS/DESIGN: The SQUEEZE Pilot Trial is a pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group, open-label, prospective pilot randomized controlled trial. Participants are children aged 29 days to under 18 years with suspected or confirmed septic shock and a need for ongoing resuscitation. Eligible participants are enrolled under an exception to consent process and randomly assigned via concealed allocation to either the Usual Care (control) or Fluid Sparing (intervention) resuscitation strategy. The primary objective of this pilot trial is to determine feasibility, based on the ability to enroll participants and to adhere to the study protocol. The primary outcome measure by which success will be determined is participant enrollment rate ("pass" defined as at least two participants/site/month, recognizing that enrollment may be slower during the run-in phase). Secondary objectives include assessing (1) appropriateness of eligibility criteria, and (2) completeness of clinical outcomes to inform the endpoints for the planned multisite trial. To support the nested translational study, SQUEEZE-D, we will also evaluate the feasibility of describing cell-free DNA (a procoagulant molecule with prognostic utility) in blood samples obtained from children enrolled into the SQUEEZE Pilot Trial at baseline and at 24 h. DISCUSSION: The optimal degree of fluid resuscitation and the timing of initiation of vasoactive support in order to achieve recommended therapeutic targets in children with septic shock remains unanswered. No prospective study to date has examined this important question for children in developed countries including Canada. Recruitment for the SQUEEZE Pilot Trial opened on 6 January 2014. Findings will inform the feasibility of the planned multicenter trial to answer our overall research question. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01973907, registered on 23 October 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1689-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5120449 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51204492016-11-28 A trial to determine whether septic shock-reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy versus usual care (SQUEEZE): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial Parker, Melissa J. Thabane, Lehana Fox-Robichaud, Alison Liaw, Patricia Choong, Karen Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Current pediatric septic shock resuscitation guidelines from the American College of Critical Care Medicine focus on the early and goal-directed administration of intravascular fluid followed by vasoactive medication infusions for persistent and fluid-refractory shock. However, accumulating adult and pediatric data suggest that excessive fluid administration is associated with worse patient outcomes and even increased risk of death. The optimal amount of intravascular fluid required in early pediatric septic shock resuscitation prior to the initiation of vasoactive support remains unanswered. METHODS/DESIGN: The SQUEEZE Pilot Trial is a pragmatic, two-arm, parallel-group, open-label, prospective pilot randomized controlled trial. Participants are children aged 29 days to under 18 years with suspected or confirmed septic shock and a need for ongoing resuscitation. Eligible participants are enrolled under an exception to consent process and randomly assigned via concealed allocation to either the Usual Care (control) or Fluid Sparing (intervention) resuscitation strategy. The primary objective of this pilot trial is to determine feasibility, based on the ability to enroll participants and to adhere to the study protocol. The primary outcome measure by which success will be determined is participant enrollment rate ("pass" defined as at least two participants/site/month, recognizing that enrollment may be slower during the run-in phase). Secondary objectives include assessing (1) appropriateness of eligibility criteria, and (2) completeness of clinical outcomes to inform the endpoints for the planned multisite trial. To support the nested translational study, SQUEEZE-D, we will also evaluate the feasibility of describing cell-free DNA (a procoagulant molecule with prognostic utility) in blood samples obtained from children enrolled into the SQUEEZE Pilot Trial at baseline and at 24 h. DISCUSSION: The optimal degree of fluid resuscitation and the timing of initiation of vasoactive support in order to achieve recommended therapeutic targets in children with septic shock remains unanswered. No prospective study to date has examined this important question for children in developed countries including Canada. Recruitment for the SQUEEZE Pilot Trial opened on 6 January 2014. Findings will inform the feasibility of the planned multicenter trial to answer our overall research question. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01973907, registered on 23 October 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1689-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC5120449/ /pubmed/27876084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1689-2 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Parker, Melissa J. Thabane, Lehana Fox-Robichaud, Alison Liaw, Patricia Choong, Karen A trial to determine whether septic shock-reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy versus usual care (SQUEEZE): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial |
title | A trial to determine whether septic shock-reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy versus usual care (SQUEEZE): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial |
title_full | A trial to determine whether septic shock-reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy versus usual care (SQUEEZE): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | A trial to determine whether septic shock-reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy versus usual care (SQUEEZE): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A trial to determine whether septic shock-reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy versus usual care (SQUEEZE): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial |
title_short | A trial to determine whether septic shock-reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy versus usual care (SQUEEZE): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | trial to determine whether septic shock-reversal is quicker in pediatric patients randomized to an early goal-directed fluid-sparing strategy versus usual care (squeeze): study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120449/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27876084 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1689-2 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkermelissaj atrialtodeterminewhethersepticshockreversalisquickerinpediatricpatientsrandomizedtoanearlygoaldirectedfluidsparingstrategyversususualcaresqueezestudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thabanelehana atrialtodeterminewhethersepticshockreversalisquickerinpediatricpatientsrandomizedtoanearlygoaldirectedfluidsparingstrategyversususualcaresqueezestudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT foxrobichaudalison atrialtodeterminewhethersepticshockreversalisquickerinpediatricpatientsrandomizedtoanearlygoaldirectedfluidsparingstrategyversususualcaresqueezestudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liawpatricia atrialtodeterminewhethersepticshockreversalisquickerinpediatricpatientsrandomizedtoanearlygoaldirectedfluidsparingstrategyversususualcaresqueezestudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT choongkaren atrialtodeterminewhethersepticshockreversalisquickerinpediatricpatientsrandomizedtoanearlygoaldirectedfluidsparingstrategyversususualcaresqueezestudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT atrialtodeterminewhethersepticshockreversalisquickerinpediatricpatientsrandomizedtoanearlygoaldirectedfluidsparingstrategyversususualcaresqueezestudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parkermelissaj trialtodeterminewhethersepticshockreversalisquickerinpediatricpatientsrandomizedtoanearlygoaldirectedfluidsparingstrategyversususualcaresqueezestudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thabanelehana trialtodeterminewhethersepticshockreversalisquickerinpediatricpatientsrandomizedtoanearlygoaldirectedfluidsparingstrategyversususualcaresqueezestudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT foxrobichaudalison trialtodeterminewhethersepticshockreversalisquickerinpediatricpatientsrandomizedtoanearlygoaldirectedfluidsparingstrategyversususualcaresqueezestudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liawpatricia trialtodeterminewhethersepticshockreversalisquickerinpediatricpatientsrandomizedtoanearlygoaldirectedfluidsparingstrategyversususualcaresqueezestudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT choongkaren trialtodeterminewhethersepticshockreversalisquickerinpediatricpatientsrandomizedtoanearlygoaldirectedfluidsparingstrategyversususualcaresqueezestudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT trialtodeterminewhethersepticshockreversalisquickerinpediatricpatientsrandomizedtoanearlygoaldirectedfluidsparingstrategyversususualcaresqueezestudyprotocolforapilotrandomizedcontrolledtrial |