Cargando…

Hypersensitivity reactions to metal implants: laboratory options

BACKGROUND: All implant compounds undergo an electrochemical process when in contact with biological fluids, as well as mechanical corrosion due to abrasive wear, with production of metal debris that may inhibit repair processes. None of the commonly-used methods can diagnose implant allergies when...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carossino, Anna Maria, Carulli, Christian, Ciuffi, Simone, Carossino, Roberto, Zappoli Thyrion, Giorgia Donata, Zonefrati, Roberto, Innocenti, Massimo, Brandi, Maria Luisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1342-y
_version_ 1782469249194786816
author Carossino, Anna Maria
Carulli, Christian
Ciuffi, Simone
Carossino, Roberto
Zappoli Thyrion, Giorgia Donata
Zonefrati, Roberto
Innocenti, Massimo
Brandi, Maria Luisa
author_facet Carossino, Anna Maria
Carulli, Christian
Ciuffi, Simone
Carossino, Roberto
Zappoli Thyrion, Giorgia Donata
Zonefrati, Roberto
Innocenti, Massimo
Brandi, Maria Luisa
author_sort Carossino, Anna Maria
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: All implant compounds undergo an electrochemical process when in contact with biological fluids, as well as mechanical corrosion due to abrasive wear, with production of metal debris that may inhibit repair processes. None of the commonly-used methods can diagnose implant allergies when used singly, therefore a panel of tests should be performed on allergic patients as pre-operative screening, or when a postoperative metal sensitisation is suspected. METHODS: We analysed patients with painful prostheses and subjects prone to allergies using the Patch Test in comparison with the Lymphocyte Transformation Test. Cytokine production was evaluated to identify prognostic markers for early diagnosis of aseptic loosening. Metal debris endocytosis and cytoskeletal rearrangement was visualised by confocal microscopy. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that the Lymphocyte Transformation Test can identify patients who have a predisposition to develop allergic reactions and can confirm the diagnosis of hypersensitivity in patients with painful prostheses. The prevalence of a Th2-cytokine pattern may be used to identify predisposition to the development of allergic diseases, while the selective presence of osteoclastogenic cytokines may be used as predictor of a negative outcome in patients with painful prosthesis. The hypothesis of the prognostic value of these cytokines as early markers of aseptic loosening is attractive, but its confirmation would require extensive testing. CONCLUSIONS: The Lymphocyte Transformation Test is the most suitable method for testing systemic allergies. We suggest that the combined use of the Patch Test and the Lymphocyte Transformation Test, associated with cytokine detection in selected patients, could provide a useful tool for preventive evaluation of immune reactivity in patients undergoing primary joint replacement surgery, and for clinical monitoring of the possible onset of a metal sensitization in patients with implanted devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5120482
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51204822016-11-28 Hypersensitivity reactions to metal implants: laboratory options Carossino, Anna Maria Carulli, Christian Ciuffi, Simone Carossino, Roberto Zappoli Thyrion, Giorgia Donata Zonefrati, Roberto Innocenti, Massimo Brandi, Maria Luisa BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: All implant compounds undergo an electrochemical process when in contact with biological fluids, as well as mechanical corrosion due to abrasive wear, with production of metal debris that may inhibit repair processes. None of the commonly-used methods can diagnose implant allergies when used singly, therefore a panel of tests should be performed on allergic patients as pre-operative screening, or when a postoperative metal sensitisation is suspected. METHODS: We analysed patients with painful prostheses and subjects prone to allergies using the Patch Test in comparison with the Lymphocyte Transformation Test. Cytokine production was evaluated to identify prognostic markers for early diagnosis of aseptic loosening. Metal debris endocytosis and cytoskeletal rearrangement was visualised by confocal microscopy. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that the Lymphocyte Transformation Test can identify patients who have a predisposition to develop allergic reactions and can confirm the diagnosis of hypersensitivity in patients with painful prostheses. The prevalence of a Th2-cytokine pattern may be used to identify predisposition to the development of allergic diseases, while the selective presence of osteoclastogenic cytokines may be used as predictor of a negative outcome in patients with painful prosthesis. The hypothesis of the prognostic value of these cytokines as early markers of aseptic loosening is attractive, but its confirmation would require extensive testing. CONCLUSIONS: The Lymphocyte Transformation Test is the most suitable method for testing systemic allergies. We suggest that the combined use of the Patch Test and the Lymphocyte Transformation Test, associated with cytokine detection in selected patients, could provide a useful tool for preventive evaluation of immune reactivity in patients undergoing primary joint replacement surgery, and for clinical monitoring of the possible onset of a metal sensitization in patients with implanted devices. BioMed Central 2016-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5120482/ /pubmed/27881114 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1342-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Carossino, Anna Maria
Carulli, Christian
Ciuffi, Simone
Carossino, Roberto
Zappoli Thyrion, Giorgia Donata
Zonefrati, Roberto
Innocenti, Massimo
Brandi, Maria Luisa
Hypersensitivity reactions to metal implants: laboratory options
title Hypersensitivity reactions to metal implants: laboratory options
title_full Hypersensitivity reactions to metal implants: laboratory options
title_fullStr Hypersensitivity reactions to metal implants: laboratory options
title_full_unstemmed Hypersensitivity reactions to metal implants: laboratory options
title_short Hypersensitivity reactions to metal implants: laboratory options
title_sort hypersensitivity reactions to metal implants: laboratory options
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120482/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881114
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-016-1342-y
work_keys_str_mv AT carossinoannamaria hypersensitivityreactionstometalimplantslaboratoryoptions
AT carullichristian hypersensitivityreactionstometalimplantslaboratoryoptions
AT ciuffisimone hypersensitivityreactionstometalimplantslaboratoryoptions
AT carossinoroberto hypersensitivityreactionstometalimplantslaboratoryoptions
AT zappolithyriongiorgiadonata hypersensitivityreactionstometalimplantslaboratoryoptions
AT zonefratiroberto hypersensitivityreactionstometalimplantslaboratoryoptions
AT innocentimassimo hypersensitivityreactionstometalimplantslaboratoryoptions
AT brandimarialuisa hypersensitivityreactionstometalimplantslaboratoryoptions