Cargando…
Can procedural and substantive elements of decision-making be reconciled in assessments of mental capacity?
Capacity legislation aims to protect individual autonomy and avoid undue paternalism as far as possible, partly through ensuring patients are not deemed to lack capacity because they make an unwise decision. To this end, the law employs a procedural test of capacity that excludes substantive judgmen...
Autor principal: | Banner, Natalie F. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120685/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27891169 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1744552312000493 |
Ejemplares similares
-
‘Radical Interpretation’ and the Assessment of Decision-Making Capacity
por: Banner, Natalie F, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Unreasonable reasons: normative judgements in the assessment of mental capacity
por: Banner, Natalie F
Publicado: (2012) -
The Neurobiology of Decision-Making and Responsibility: Reconciling Mechanism and Mindedness
por: Shadlen, Michael N., et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
βα-Hairpin Clamps Brace βαβ Modules and Can Make Substantive Contributions to the Stability of TIM Barrel Proteins
por: Yang, Xiaoyan, et al.
Publicado: (2009) -
Reconciling Autonomy and Beneficence in Treatment Decision-Making for Companion Animal Patients
por: Gray, Carol, et al.
Publicado: (2018)