Cargando…

How Many Kinds of Birds Are There and Why Does It Matter?

Estimates of global species diversity have varied widely, primarily based on variation in the numbers derived from different inventory methods of arthropods and other small invertebrates. Within vertebrates, current diversity metrics for fishes, amphibians, and reptiles are known to be poor estimato...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barrowclough, George F., Cracraft, Joel, Klicka, John, Zink, Robert M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27880775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166307
_version_ 1782469303535140864
author Barrowclough, George F.
Cracraft, Joel
Klicka, John
Zink, Robert M.
author_facet Barrowclough, George F.
Cracraft, Joel
Klicka, John
Zink, Robert M.
author_sort Barrowclough, George F.
collection PubMed
description Estimates of global species diversity have varied widely, primarily based on variation in the numbers derived from different inventory methods of arthropods and other small invertebrates. Within vertebrates, current diversity metrics for fishes, amphibians, and reptiles are known to be poor estimators, whereas those for birds and mammals are often assumed to be relatively well established. We show that avian evolutionary diversity is significantly underestimated due to a taxonomic tradition not found in most other taxonomic groups. Using a sample of 200 species taken from a list of 9159 biological species determined primarily by morphological criteria, we applied a diagnostic, evolutionary species concept to a morphological and distributional data set that resulted in an estimate of 18,043 species of birds worldwide, with a 95% confidence interval of 15,845 to 20,470. In a second, independent analysis, we examined intraspecific genetic data from 437 traditional avian species, finding an average of 2.4 evolutionary units per species, which can be considered proxies for phylogenetic species. Comparing recent lists of species to that used in this study (based primarily on morphology) revealed that taxonomic changes in the past 25 years have led to an increase of only 9%, well below what our results predict. Therefore, our molecular and morphological results suggest that the current taxonomy of birds understimates avian species diversity by at least a factor of two. We suggest that a revised taxonomy that better captures avian species diversity will enhance the quantification and analysis of global patterns of diversity and distribution, as well as provide a more appropriate framework for understanding the evolutionary history of birds.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5120813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51208132016-12-15 How Many Kinds of Birds Are There and Why Does It Matter? Barrowclough, George F. Cracraft, Joel Klicka, John Zink, Robert M. PLoS One Research Article Estimates of global species diversity have varied widely, primarily based on variation in the numbers derived from different inventory methods of arthropods and other small invertebrates. Within vertebrates, current diversity metrics for fishes, amphibians, and reptiles are known to be poor estimators, whereas those for birds and mammals are often assumed to be relatively well established. We show that avian evolutionary diversity is significantly underestimated due to a taxonomic tradition not found in most other taxonomic groups. Using a sample of 200 species taken from a list of 9159 biological species determined primarily by morphological criteria, we applied a diagnostic, evolutionary species concept to a morphological and distributional data set that resulted in an estimate of 18,043 species of birds worldwide, with a 95% confidence interval of 15,845 to 20,470. In a second, independent analysis, we examined intraspecific genetic data from 437 traditional avian species, finding an average of 2.4 evolutionary units per species, which can be considered proxies for phylogenetic species. Comparing recent lists of species to that used in this study (based primarily on morphology) revealed that taxonomic changes in the past 25 years have led to an increase of only 9%, well below what our results predict. Therefore, our molecular and morphological results suggest that the current taxonomy of birds understimates avian species diversity by at least a factor of two. We suggest that a revised taxonomy that better captures avian species diversity will enhance the quantification and analysis of global patterns of diversity and distribution, as well as provide a more appropriate framework for understanding the evolutionary history of birds. Public Library of Science 2016-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC5120813/ /pubmed/27880775 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166307 Text en © 2016 Barrowclough et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barrowclough, George F.
Cracraft, Joel
Klicka, John
Zink, Robert M.
How Many Kinds of Birds Are There and Why Does It Matter?
title How Many Kinds of Birds Are There and Why Does It Matter?
title_full How Many Kinds of Birds Are There and Why Does It Matter?
title_fullStr How Many Kinds of Birds Are There and Why Does It Matter?
title_full_unstemmed How Many Kinds of Birds Are There and Why Does It Matter?
title_short How Many Kinds of Birds Are There and Why Does It Matter?
title_sort how many kinds of birds are there and why does it matter?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27880775
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166307
work_keys_str_mv AT barrowcloughgeorgef howmanykindsofbirdsarethereandwhydoesitmatter
AT cracraftjoel howmanykindsofbirdsarethereandwhydoesitmatter
AT klickajohn howmanykindsofbirdsarethereandwhydoesitmatter
AT zinkrobertm howmanykindsofbirdsarethereandwhydoesitmatter