Cargando…

Abdominal tumors in children: Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and traditional open surgery

The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in pediatric patients has been steadily increasing in recent years. However, its use for diagnosing and treating abdominal tumors in children is still limited compared with adults, especially when malignancy is a matter of debate. Here, we describe the exp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oh, Chaeyoun, Youn, Joong Kee, Han, Ji-Won, Kim, Hyun-Young, Jung, Sung-Eun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27861341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005181
_version_ 1782469319256440832
author Oh, Chaeyoun
Youn, Joong Kee
Han, Ji-Won
Kim, Hyun-Young
Jung, Sung-Eun
author_facet Oh, Chaeyoun
Youn, Joong Kee
Han, Ji-Won
Kim, Hyun-Young
Jung, Sung-Eun
author_sort Oh, Chaeyoun
collection PubMed
description The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in pediatric patients has been steadily increasing in recent years. However, its use for diagnosing and treating abdominal tumors in children is still limited compared with adults, especially when malignancy is a matter of debate. Here, we describe the experience at our center with pediatric abdominal tumors to show the safety and feasibility of MIS. Based on a retrospective review of patient records, we selected for study those pediatric patients who had undergone diagnostic exploration or curative resection for abdominal tumors at a single center from January 2010 through August 2015. Diagnostic exploration for abdominal tumors was performed in 32 cases and curative resection in 173 cases (205 operations). MIS was performed in 11 cases of diagnostic exploration (34.4%) and 38 cases of curative resection (21.9%). The mean age of the children who underwent MIS was 6.09 ± 5.2 years. With regard to diagnostic exploration, patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were found to be similar for MIS and open surgery. With regard to curative resection, however, the mean age was significantly lower among the patients who underwent open surgery (4.21 ± 4.20 vs 6.02 ± 4.99 for MIS, P = 0.047), and the proportion of malignancies was significantly higher (80% vs 39.4% for MIS, P < 0.001). MIS compared favorably with open surgery with respect to the rate of recurrence (6.7% vs 35.1%, P = 0.035), the rate of intraoperative transfusions (34.2% vs 58.5%, P = 0.01), the median amount of blood transfused (14 vs 22 mL/kg, P = 0.001), and the mean number of hospital days (4.66 ± 2.36 vs 7.21 ± 5.09, P < 0.001). Complication rates did not differ significantly between the MIS and open surgery groups. The operation was converted to open surgery in 3 cases (27.2%) of diagnostic MIS and in 5 cases (13.1%) of curative MIS. MIS was found to be both feasible and effective for the diagnosis and curative treatment of pediatric abdominal tumors. However, to determine the surgical role and guidelines for MIS for each specific tumor, a multicenter prospective study with a long-term follow-up is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5120898
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51208982016-11-28 Abdominal tumors in children: Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and traditional open surgery Oh, Chaeyoun Youn, Joong Kee Han, Ji-Won Kim, Hyun-Young Jung, Sung-Eun Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 The use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in pediatric patients has been steadily increasing in recent years. However, its use for diagnosing and treating abdominal tumors in children is still limited compared with adults, especially when malignancy is a matter of debate. Here, we describe the experience at our center with pediatric abdominal tumors to show the safety and feasibility of MIS. Based on a retrospective review of patient records, we selected for study those pediatric patients who had undergone diagnostic exploration or curative resection for abdominal tumors at a single center from January 2010 through August 2015. Diagnostic exploration for abdominal tumors was performed in 32 cases and curative resection in 173 cases (205 operations). MIS was performed in 11 cases of diagnostic exploration (34.4%) and 38 cases of curative resection (21.9%). The mean age of the children who underwent MIS was 6.09 ± 5.2 years. With regard to diagnostic exploration, patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were found to be similar for MIS and open surgery. With regard to curative resection, however, the mean age was significantly lower among the patients who underwent open surgery (4.21 ± 4.20 vs 6.02 ± 4.99 for MIS, P = 0.047), and the proportion of malignancies was significantly higher (80% vs 39.4% for MIS, P < 0.001). MIS compared favorably with open surgery with respect to the rate of recurrence (6.7% vs 35.1%, P = 0.035), the rate of intraoperative transfusions (34.2% vs 58.5%, P = 0.01), the median amount of blood transfused (14 vs 22 mL/kg, P = 0.001), and the mean number of hospital days (4.66 ± 2.36 vs 7.21 ± 5.09, P < 0.001). Complication rates did not differ significantly between the MIS and open surgery groups. The operation was converted to open surgery in 3 cases (27.2%) of diagnostic MIS and in 5 cases (13.1%) of curative MIS. MIS was found to be both feasible and effective for the diagnosis and curative treatment of pediatric abdominal tumors. However, to determine the surgical role and guidelines for MIS for each specific tumor, a multicenter prospective study with a long-term follow-up is warranted. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5120898/ /pubmed/27861341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005181 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives License 4.0, which allows for redistribution, commercial and non-commercial, as long as it is passed along unchanged and in whole, with credit to the author. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 5700
Oh, Chaeyoun
Youn, Joong Kee
Han, Ji-Won
Kim, Hyun-Young
Jung, Sung-Eun
Abdominal tumors in children: Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and traditional open surgery
title Abdominal tumors in children: Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and traditional open surgery
title_full Abdominal tumors in children: Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and traditional open surgery
title_fullStr Abdominal tumors in children: Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and traditional open surgery
title_full_unstemmed Abdominal tumors in children: Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and traditional open surgery
title_short Abdominal tumors in children: Comparison between minimally invasive surgery and traditional open surgery
title_sort abdominal tumors in children: comparison between minimally invasive surgery and traditional open surgery
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120898/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27861341
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005181
work_keys_str_mv AT ohchaeyoun abdominaltumorsinchildrencomparisonbetweenminimallyinvasivesurgeryandtraditionalopensurgery
AT younjoongkee abdominaltumorsinchildrencomparisonbetweenminimallyinvasivesurgeryandtraditionalopensurgery
AT hanjiwon abdominaltumorsinchildrencomparisonbetweenminimallyinvasivesurgeryandtraditionalopensurgery
AT kimhyunyoung abdominaltumorsinchildrencomparisonbetweenminimallyinvasivesurgeryandtraditionalopensurgery
AT jungsungeun abdominaltumorsinchildrencomparisonbetweenminimallyinvasivesurgeryandtraditionalopensurgery