Cargando…

Comparison of extracranial artery stenosis and cerebral blood flow, assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance, using digital subtraction angiography as the reference standard

Extracranial arteriosclerosis usually indicates a high risk of ischemic stroke. In the past, a clinical decision following diagnosis was dependent on the percentage of vessel stenosis determined by an invasive technique. We aimed to develop a quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) technique to evalua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Jingjing, Wu, Dan, Mo, Yongqian, Wang, Anxin, Hu, Shiyu, Ren, Lijie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27861368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005370
_version_ 1782469325477642240
author Cai, Jingjing
Wu, Dan
Mo, Yongqian
Wang, Anxin
Hu, Shiyu
Ren, Lijie
author_facet Cai, Jingjing
Wu, Dan
Mo, Yongqian
Wang, Anxin
Hu, Shiyu
Ren, Lijie
author_sort Cai, Jingjing
collection PubMed
description Extracranial arteriosclerosis usually indicates a high risk of ischemic stroke. In the past, a clinical decision following diagnosis was dependent on the percentage of vessel stenosis determined by an invasive technique. We aimed to develop a quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) technique to evaluate artery structure and cerebral hemodynamics noninvasively. QMR and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were performed in 67 patients with suspected cerebral vascular disease at our hospital. Accuracy, sensitivity, positive predictive values (PPVs), negative predictive values (NPVs), and Pearson correlation coefficient of QMR were calculated and compared for the detection and measurement of vascular stenoses using DSA as a gold standard. For patients with unilateral artery stenosis, quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) was measured by QMR in ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres. Among 67 subjects (male 54, female 12), 201 stenoses were detected by QMR and DSA. QMR measuring the degree of stenosis and lesion length was in good correlation with the results obtained by DSA (r(2) = 0.845, 0.721, respectively). As for artery stenosis, PPV and NPV of QMR were 89.55% and 95.71%, respectively. As for severe stenosis, sensitivity and specificity of QMR were 82.3% and 86.0% with DSA as a reference. For subjects with unilateral carotid stenosis, CBF in basal ganglia decreased significantly (P < 0.001) compared with the contralateral one in symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. For subjects with moderate stenosis (50–79%), CBF of temporal and basal ganglia was decreased compared with the contralateral ganglia. However, CBF in subjects with severe stenosis or occlusion in the basal ganglia was mildly elevated compared with the contralateral ganglia (P < 0.001). In our study, a good correlation was found between QMR and DSA when measuring artery stenosis and CBF. QMR may become an important method for measuring artery stenosis and cerebral hemodynamics in the future.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5120925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51209252016-11-28 Comparison of extracranial artery stenosis and cerebral blood flow, assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance, using digital subtraction angiography as the reference standard Cai, Jingjing Wu, Dan Mo, Yongqian Wang, Anxin Hu, Shiyu Ren, Lijie Medicine (Baltimore) 5300 Extracranial arteriosclerosis usually indicates a high risk of ischemic stroke. In the past, a clinical decision following diagnosis was dependent on the percentage of vessel stenosis determined by an invasive technique. We aimed to develop a quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) technique to evaluate artery structure and cerebral hemodynamics noninvasively. QMR and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were performed in 67 patients with suspected cerebral vascular disease at our hospital. Accuracy, sensitivity, positive predictive values (PPVs), negative predictive values (NPVs), and Pearson correlation coefficient of QMR were calculated and compared for the detection and measurement of vascular stenoses using DSA as a gold standard. For patients with unilateral artery stenosis, quantitative cerebral blood flow (CBF) was measured by QMR in ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres. Among 67 subjects (male 54, female 12), 201 stenoses were detected by QMR and DSA. QMR measuring the degree of stenosis and lesion length was in good correlation with the results obtained by DSA (r(2) = 0.845, 0.721, respectively). As for artery stenosis, PPV and NPV of QMR were 89.55% and 95.71%, respectively. As for severe stenosis, sensitivity and specificity of QMR were 82.3% and 86.0% with DSA as a reference. For subjects with unilateral carotid stenosis, CBF in basal ganglia decreased significantly (P < 0.001) compared with the contralateral one in symptomatic and asymptomatic groups. For subjects with moderate stenosis (50–79%), CBF of temporal and basal ganglia was decreased compared with the contralateral ganglia. However, CBF in subjects with severe stenosis or occlusion in the basal ganglia was mildly elevated compared with the contralateral ganglia (P < 0.001). In our study, a good correlation was found between QMR and DSA when measuring artery stenosis and CBF. QMR may become an important method for measuring artery stenosis and cerebral hemodynamics in the future. Wolters Kluwer Health 2016-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5120925/ /pubmed/27861368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005370 Text en Copyright © 2016 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0
spellingShingle 5300
Cai, Jingjing
Wu, Dan
Mo, Yongqian
Wang, Anxin
Hu, Shiyu
Ren, Lijie
Comparison of extracranial artery stenosis and cerebral blood flow, assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance, using digital subtraction angiography as the reference standard
title Comparison of extracranial artery stenosis and cerebral blood flow, assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance, using digital subtraction angiography as the reference standard
title_full Comparison of extracranial artery stenosis and cerebral blood flow, assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance, using digital subtraction angiography as the reference standard
title_fullStr Comparison of extracranial artery stenosis and cerebral blood flow, assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance, using digital subtraction angiography as the reference standard
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of extracranial artery stenosis and cerebral blood flow, assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance, using digital subtraction angiography as the reference standard
title_short Comparison of extracranial artery stenosis and cerebral blood flow, assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance, using digital subtraction angiography as the reference standard
title_sort comparison of extracranial artery stenosis and cerebral blood flow, assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance, using digital subtraction angiography as the reference standard
topic 5300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5120925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27861368
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000005370
work_keys_str_mv AT caijingjing comparisonofextracranialarterystenosisandcerebralbloodflowassessedbyquantitativemagneticresonanceusingdigitalsubtractionangiographyasthereferencestandard
AT wudan comparisonofextracranialarterystenosisandcerebralbloodflowassessedbyquantitativemagneticresonanceusingdigitalsubtractionangiographyasthereferencestandard
AT moyongqian comparisonofextracranialarterystenosisandcerebralbloodflowassessedbyquantitativemagneticresonanceusingdigitalsubtractionangiographyasthereferencestandard
AT wanganxin comparisonofextracranialarterystenosisandcerebralbloodflowassessedbyquantitativemagneticresonanceusingdigitalsubtractionangiographyasthereferencestandard
AT hushiyu comparisonofextracranialarterystenosisandcerebralbloodflowassessedbyquantitativemagneticresonanceusingdigitalsubtractionangiographyasthereferencestandard
AT renlijie comparisonofextracranialarterystenosisandcerebralbloodflowassessedbyquantitativemagneticresonanceusingdigitalsubtractionangiographyasthereferencestandard