Cargando…

Predicting resting energy expenditure in underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese adult hospital patients

BACKGROUND: When indirect calorimetry is not available, predictive equations are used to estimate resing energy expenditure (REE). There is no consensus about which equation to use in hospitalized patients. The objective of this study is to examine the validity of REE predictive equations for underw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kruizenga, Hinke M., Hofsteenge, Geesje H., Weijs, Peter J.M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5121980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27904645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12986-016-0145-3
_version_ 1782469483311398912
author Kruizenga, Hinke M.
Hofsteenge, Geesje H.
Weijs, Peter J.M.
author_facet Kruizenga, Hinke M.
Hofsteenge, Geesje H.
Weijs, Peter J.M.
author_sort Kruizenga, Hinke M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: When indirect calorimetry is not available, predictive equations are used to estimate resing energy expenditure (REE). There is no consensus about which equation to use in hospitalized patients. The objective of this study is to examine the validity of REE predictive equations for underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese inpatients and outpatients by comparison with indirect calorimetry. METHODS: Equations were included when based on weight, height, age, and/or gender. REE was measured with indirect calorimetry. A prediction between 90 and 110% of the measured REE was considered accurate. The bias and root-mean-square error (RMSE) were used to evaluate how well the equations fitted the REE measurement. Subgroup analysis was performed for BMI. A new equation was developed based on regression analysis and tested. RESULTS: 513 general hospital patients were included, (253 F, 260 M), 237 inpatients and 276 outpatients. Fifteen predictive equations were used. The most used fixed factors (25 kcal/kg/day, 30 kcal/kg/day and 2000 kcal for female and 2500 kcal for male) were added. The percentage of accurate predicted REE was low in all equations, ranging from 8 to 49%. Overall the new equation performed equal to the best performing Korth equation and slightly better than the well-known WHO equation based on weight and height (49% vs 45% accurate). Categorized by BMI subgroups, the new equation, Korth and the WHO equation based on weight and height performed best in all categories except from the obese subgroup. The original Harris and Benedict (HB) equation was best for obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: REE predictive equations are only accurate in about half the patients. The WHO equation is advised up to BMI 30, and HB equation is advised for obese (over BMI 30). Measuring REE with indirect calorimetry is preferred, and should be used when available and feasible in order to optimize nutritional support in hospital inpatients and outpatients with different degrees of malnutrition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5121980
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51219802016-11-30 Predicting resting energy expenditure in underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese adult hospital patients Kruizenga, Hinke M. Hofsteenge, Geesje H. Weijs, Peter J.M. Nutr Metab (Lond) Research BACKGROUND: When indirect calorimetry is not available, predictive equations are used to estimate resing energy expenditure (REE). There is no consensus about which equation to use in hospitalized patients. The objective of this study is to examine the validity of REE predictive equations for underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese inpatients and outpatients by comparison with indirect calorimetry. METHODS: Equations were included when based on weight, height, age, and/or gender. REE was measured with indirect calorimetry. A prediction between 90 and 110% of the measured REE was considered accurate. The bias and root-mean-square error (RMSE) were used to evaluate how well the equations fitted the REE measurement. Subgroup analysis was performed for BMI. A new equation was developed based on regression analysis and tested. RESULTS: 513 general hospital patients were included, (253 F, 260 M), 237 inpatients and 276 outpatients. Fifteen predictive equations were used. The most used fixed factors (25 kcal/kg/day, 30 kcal/kg/day and 2000 kcal for female and 2500 kcal for male) were added. The percentage of accurate predicted REE was low in all equations, ranging from 8 to 49%. Overall the new equation performed equal to the best performing Korth equation and slightly better than the well-known WHO equation based on weight and height (49% vs 45% accurate). Categorized by BMI subgroups, the new equation, Korth and the WHO equation based on weight and height performed best in all categories except from the obese subgroup. The original Harris and Benedict (HB) equation was best for obese patients. CONCLUSIONS: REE predictive equations are only accurate in about half the patients. The WHO equation is advised up to BMI 30, and HB equation is advised for obese (over BMI 30). Measuring REE with indirect calorimetry is preferred, and should be used when available and feasible in order to optimize nutritional support in hospital inpatients and outpatients with different degrees of malnutrition. BioMed Central 2016-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5121980/ /pubmed/27904645 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12986-016-0145-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Kruizenga, Hinke M.
Hofsteenge, Geesje H.
Weijs, Peter J.M.
Predicting resting energy expenditure in underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese adult hospital patients
title Predicting resting energy expenditure in underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese adult hospital patients
title_full Predicting resting energy expenditure in underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese adult hospital patients
title_fullStr Predicting resting energy expenditure in underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese adult hospital patients
title_full_unstemmed Predicting resting energy expenditure in underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese adult hospital patients
title_short Predicting resting energy expenditure in underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese adult hospital patients
title_sort predicting resting energy expenditure in underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese adult hospital patients
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5121980/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27904645
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12986-016-0145-3
work_keys_str_mv AT kruizengahinkem predictingrestingenergyexpenditureinunderweightnormalweightoverweightandobeseadulthospitalpatients
AT hofsteengegeesjeh predictingrestingenergyexpenditureinunderweightnormalweightoverweightandobeseadulthospitalpatients
AT weijspeterjm predictingrestingenergyexpenditureinunderweightnormalweightoverweightandobeseadulthospitalpatients