Cargando…

Comparison of treatment response, remission rate and drug adherence in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients treated with etanercept, adalimumab or tocilizumab

BACKGROUND: Treatment response, remission rates and compliance in patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (polyJIA) treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or tocilizumab were analyzed in clinical practice. METHODS: Data collected in the German BIKER registry were analyzed in patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Horneff, Gerd, Klein, Ariane, Klotsche, Jens, Minden, Kirsten, Huppertz, Hans-Iko, Weller-Heinemann, Frank, Kuemmerle-Deschner, Jasmin, Haas, Johannes-Peter, Hospach, Anton
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-016-1170-3
_version_ 1782469490609487872
author Horneff, Gerd
Klein, Ariane
Klotsche, Jens
Minden, Kirsten
Huppertz, Hans-Iko
Weller-Heinemann, Frank
Kuemmerle-Deschner, Jasmin
Haas, Johannes-Peter
Hospach, Anton
author_facet Horneff, Gerd
Klein, Ariane
Klotsche, Jens
Minden, Kirsten
Huppertz, Hans-Iko
Weller-Heinemann, Frank
Kuemmerle-Deschner, Jasmin
Haas, Johannes-Peter
Hospach, Anton
author_sort Horneff, Gerd
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment response, remission rates and compliance in patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (polyJIA) treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or tocilizumab were analyzed in clinical practice. METHODS: Data collected in the German BIKER registry were analyzed in patients with polyJIA who started treatment with approved biologics, adalimumab, etanercept or tocilizumab, from 2011 to 2015. Baseline patient characteristics, treatment response, safety and drug survival were compared. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-six patient started adalimumab, 419 etanercept and 74 tocilizumab, with differences in baseline patient characteristics. Baseline Juvenile Disease Activity Score (JADAS)10 (mean ± SD) in the adalimumab/etanercept/tocilizumab cohorts was 12.1+/−7.6, 13.8 ± 7.1 and 15.1 ± 7.4, respectively (adalimumab vs etanercept, p = 0.01), and Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ)-disability index scores was 0.43 ± 0.58, 0.59 ± 0.6 and 0.63 ± 0.55, respectively (adalimumab vs etanercept, p < 0.001). Uveitis history was more frequent in the adalimumab cohort (OR 5.73; p < 0.001). Balanced patients’ samples were obtained by a generalized propensity score to adjust for baseline differences. Pediatric ACR30/50/70/90 criterion improvement after 3 months treatment was achieved by 68%/60%/42%/24% in the etanercept cohort, 67%/59%/43%/27% in the adalimumab cohort and 61%/52%/35%/26% in the tocilizumab cohort. At 24 months, JADAS minimal disease activity was achieved in 52.4%/61.3%/52.4% and JADAS remission in 27.9%/34.8%/27.9% patients in the adalimumab/etanercept/tocilizumab cohorts, respectively. Etanercept was used in 95.5% of patients as a first biologic, adalimumab in 50.8% and tocilizumab in 20.2%. There were no important differences in efficacy between first-line and second-line use of biologics. In total 60.4%/49.4%/31.1% patients discontinued adalimumab/etanercept/tocilizumab, respectively (HR for adalimumab 1.67; p < 0.001; HR for tocilizumab 0.35; p = 0.001). Drug survival rates did not differ significantly in patients on biologic monotherapy compared with combination therapy with methotrexate. Over 4 years observation under etanercept/adalimumab/tocilizumab, 996/386/103 adverse events, and 148/119/26 serious adverse events, respectively, were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, etanercept is most frequently used as first-line biologic. Adalimumab/etanercept/tocilizumab showed comparable efficacy toward polyJIA. Overall, tolerance was acceptable. Interestingly, compliance was highest with tocilizumab and lowest with adalimumab. This study provides the first indication for the comparison of different biologic agents in polyarticular JIA based on observational study data with all their weaknesses and demonstrates the need for well-controlled head-to-head studies for confirmation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-016-1170-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5122012
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51220122016-11-30 Comparison of treatment response, remission rate and drug adherence in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients treated with etanercept, adalimumab or tocilizumab Horneff, Gerd Klein, Ariane Klotsche, Jens Minden, Kirsten Huppertz, Hans-Iko Weller-Heinemann, Frank Kuemmerle-Deschner, Jasmin Haas, Johannes-Peter Hospach, Anton Arthritis Res Ther Research Article BACKGROUND: Treatment response, remission rates and compliance in patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (polyJIA) treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or tocilizumab were analyzed in clinical practice. METHODS: Data collected in the German BIKER registry were analyzed in patients with polyJIA who started treatment with approved biologics, adalimumab, etanercept or tocilizumab, from 2011 to 2015. Baseline patient characteristics, treatment response, safety and drug survival were compared. RESULTS: Two hundred thirty-six patient started adalimumab, 419 etanercept and 74 tocilizumab, with differences in baseline patient characteristics. Baseline Juvenile Disease Activity Score (JADAS)10 (mean ± SD) in the adalimumab/etanercept/tocilizumab cohorts was 12.1+/−7.6, 13.8 ± 7.1 and 15.1 ± 7.4, respectively (adalimumab vs etanercept, p = 0.01), and Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (CHAQ)-disability index scores was 0.43 ± 0.58, 0.59 ± 0.6 and 0.63 ± 0.55, respectively (adalimumab vs etanercept, p < 0.001). Uveitis history was more frequent in the adalimumab cohort (OR 5.73; p < 0.001). Balanced patients’ samples were obtained by a generalized propensity score to adjust for baseline differences. Pediatric ACR30/50/70/90 criterion improvement after 3 months treatment was achieved by 68%/60%/42%/24% in the etanercept cohort, 67%/59%/43%/27% in the adalimumab cohort and 61%/52%/35%/26% in the tocilizumab cohort. At 24 months, JADAS minimal disease activity was achieved in 52.4%/61.3%/52.4% and JADAS remission in 27.9%/34.8%/27.9% patients in the adalimumab/etanercept/tocilizumab cohorts, respectively. Etanercept was used in 95.5% of patients as a first biologic, adalimumab in 50.8% and tocilizumab in 20.2%. There were no important differences in efficacy between first-line and second-line use of biologics. In total 60.4%/49.4%/31.1% patients discontinued adalimumab/etanercept/tocilizumab, respectively (HR for adalimumab 1.67; p < 0.001; HR for tocilizumab 0.35; p = 0.001). Drug survival rates did not differ significantly in patients on biologic monotherapy compared with combination therapy with methotrexate. Over 4 years observation under etanercept/adalimumab/tocilizumab, 996/386/103 adverse events, and 148/119/26 serious adverse events, respectively, were reported. CONCLUSIONS: In clinical practice, etanercept is most frequently used as first-line biologic. Adalimumab/etanercept/tocilizumab showed comparable efficacy toward polyJIA. Overall, tolerance was acceptable. Interestingly, compliance was highest with tocilizumab and lowest with adalimumab. This study provides the first indication for the comparison of different biologic agents in polyarticular JIA based on observational study data with all their weaknesses and demonstrates the need for well-controlled head-to-head studies for confirmation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13075-016-1170-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-11-24 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5122012/ /pubmed/27881144 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-016-1170-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Horneff, Gerd
Klein, Ariane
Klotsche, Jens
Minden, Kirsten
Huppertz, Hans-Iko
Weller-Heinemann, Frank
Kuemmerle-Deschner, Jasmin
Haas, Johannes-Peter
Hospach, Anton
Comparison of treatment response, remission rate and drug adherence in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients treated with etanercept, adalimumab or tocilizumab
title Comparison of treatment response, remission rate and drug adherence in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients treated with etanercept, adalimumab or tocilizumab
title_full Comparison of treatment response, remission rate and drug adherence in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients treated with etanercept, adalimumab or tocilizumab
title_fullStr Comparison of treatment response, remission rate and drug adherence in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients treated with etanercept, adalimumab or tocilizumab
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of treatment response, remission rate and drug adherence in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients treated with etanercept, adalimumab or tocilizumab
title_short Comparison of treatment response, remission rate and drug adherence in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients treated with etanercept, adalimumab or tocilizumab
title_sort comparison of treatment response, remission rate and drug adherence in polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients treated with etanercept, adalimumab or tocilizumab
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122012/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13075-016-1170-3
work_keys_str_mv AT horneffgerd comparisonoftreatmentresponseremissionrateanddrugadherenceinpolyarticularjuvenileidiopathicarthritispatientstreatedwithetanerceptadalimumabortocilizumab
AT kleinariane comparisonoftreatmentresponseremissionrateanddrugadherenceinpolyarticularjuvenileidiopathicarthritispatientstreatedwithetanerceptadalimumabortocilizumab
AT klotschejens comparisonoftreatmentresponseremissionrateanddrugadherenceinpolyarticularjuvenileidiopathicarthritispatientstreatedwithetanerceptadalimumabortocilizumab
AT mindenkirsten comparisonoftreatmentresponseremissionrateanddrugadherenceinpolyarticularjuvenileidiopathicarthritispatientstreatedwithetanerceptadalimumabortocilizumab
AT huppertzhansiko comparisonoftreatmentresponseremissionrateanddrugadherenceinpolyarticularjuvenileidiopathicarthritispatientstreatedwithetanerceptadalimumabortocilizumab
AT wellerheinemannfrank comparisonoftreatmentresponseremissionrateanddrugadherenceinpolyarticularjuvenileidiopathicarthritispatientstreatedwithetanerceptadalimumabortocilizumab
AT kuemmerledeschnerjasmin comparisonoftreatmentresponseremissionrateanddrugadherenceinpolyarticularjuvenileidiopathicarthritispatientstreatedwithetanerceptadalimumabortocilizumab
AT haasjohannespeter comparisonoftreatmentresponseremissionrateanddrugadherenceinpolyarticularjuvenileidiopathicarthritispatientstreatedwithetanerceptadalimumabortocilizumab
AT hospachanton comparisonoftreatmentresponseremissionrateanddrugadherenceinpolyarticularjuvenileidiopathicarthritispatientstreatedwithetanerceptadalimumabortocilizumab