Cargando…
An evaluation of equity and equality in physical activity policies in four European countries
BACKGROUND: There is strong research evidence on the importance of health equity and equality for wellbeing in societies. As chronic non-communicable diseases are widespread, the positive impact of physical activity (PA) on health has gained importance. However, PA at the population level is far fro...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0481-y |
_version_ | 1782469494974709760 |
---|---|
author | Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija Sandu, Petru Syed, Ahmed M. Jakobsen, Mette W. |
author_facet | Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija Sandu, Petru Syed, Ahmed M. Jakobsen, Mette W. |
author_sort | Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is strong research evidence on the importance of health equity and equality for wellbeing in societies. As chronic non-communicable diseases are widespread, the positive impact of physical activity (PA) on health has gained importance. However, PA at the population level is far from optimal. PA depends not only on individual factors, but also on policies for PA in sport, health, transport, education and other sectors, on social and cultural factors, and on the environment. Addressing health inequalities and inequities in PA promotion policies could benefit from policy development processes based on partnership and collaboration between various sectors, researchers, practitioners and policy makers (= cross-sectoral, evidence-informed policy making). The objective of this article is to describe how equity and equality was addressed in PA policies in four EU member states (Denmark, Finland, Romania and England), who were partners in the REPOPA project (www.repopa.eu, EC/FP7/Health Research/GA 281532). METHODS: Content analysis of 14 PA policies and 61 interviews were undertaken between 2012 and 2013 with stakeholders involved in developing PA policies in partner countries. RESULTS: Even though specific population subgroups were mentioned in the policy documents analysed, they were not necessarily defined as vulnerable populations nor was there a mention of additional emphasis to support such groups from being marginalised by the policy due to inequity or inequality. There were no clear objectives and activities in the analysed policies suggesting commitment of additional resources in favour of such groups. Addressing equity and equality were often not included in the core aims of the policies analysed; these aspects were mentioned in the background of the policy documents analysed, without being explicitly stated in the aims or activities of the policies. In order to tackle health inequities and inequalities and their consequences on the health status of different population subgroups, a more instrumental approach to health equality and equity in PA promotion policies is needed. Policies should include aims to address health inequalities and inequities as fundamental objectives and also consider opportunities to allocate resources to reduce them for identified groups in this regard: the socially excluded, the remote, and the poor. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of aspects related to health inequalities and inequities in PA policies needs monitoring, evaluation and transparent accountability if we are to see the best gains in health of socially disadvantaged group. To tackle health inequities and inequalities governance structures need to take into consideration proportionate universalism. Thus, to achieve change in the social determinants of health, policy makers should pay attention to PA and proportionally invest for universal access to PA services. PA promotion advocates should develop a deeper awareness of political and policy structures and require more equity and equality in PA policies from those who they seek to influence, within specific settings for policy making and developing the policy agenda. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5122031 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51220312016-11-30 An evaluation of equity and equality in physical activity policies in four European countries Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija Sandu, Petru Syed, Ahmed M. Jakobsen, Mette W. Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: There is strong research evidence on the importance of health equity and equality for wellbeing in societies. As chronic non-communicable diseases are widespread, the positive impact of physical activity (PA) on health has gained importance. However, PA at the population level is far from optimal. PA depends not only on individual factors, but also on policies for PA in sport, health, transport, education and other sectors, on social and cultural factors, and on the environment. Addressing health inequalities and inequities in PA promotion policies could benefit from policy development processes based on partnership and collaboration between various sectors, researchers, practitioners and policy makers (= cross-sectoral, evidence-informed policy making). The objective of this article is to describe how equity and equality was addressed in PA policies in four EU member states (Denmark, Finland, Romania and England), who were partners in the REPOPA project (www.repopa.eu, EC/FP7/Health Research/GA 281532). METHODS: Content analysis of 14 PA policies and 61 interviews were undertaken between 2012 and 2013 with stakeholders involved in developing PA policies in partner countries. RESULTS: Even though specific population subgroups were mentioned in the policy documents analysed, they were not necessarily defined as vulnerable populations nor was there a mention of additional emphasis to support such groups from being marginalised by the policy due to inequity or inequality. There were no clear objectives and activities in the analysed policies suggesting commitment of additional resources in favour of such groups. Addressing equity and equality were often not included in the core aims of the policies analysed; these aspects were mentioned in the background of the policy documents analysed, without being explicitly stated in the aims or activities of the policies. In order to tackle health inequities and inequalities and their consequences on the health status of different population subgroups, a more instrumental approach to health equality and equity in PA promotion policies is needed. Policies should include aims to address health inequalities and inequities as fundamental objectives and also consider opportunities to allocate resources to reduce them for identified groups in this regard: the socially excluded, the remote, and the poor. CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of aspects related to health inequalities and inequities in PA policies needs monitoring, evaluation and transparent accountability if we are to see the best gains in health of socially disadvantaged group. To tackle health inequities and inequalities governance structures need to take into consideration proportionate universalism. Thus, to achieve change in the social determinants of health, policy makers should pay attention to PA and proportionally invest for universal access to PA services. PA promotion advocates should develop a deeper awareness of political and policy structures and require more equity and equality in PA policies from those who they seek to influence, within specific settings for policy making and developing the policy agenda. BioMed Central 2016-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC5122031/ /pubmed/27881131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0481-y Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hämäläinen, Riitta-Maija Sandu, Petru Syed, Ahmed M. Jakobsen, Mette W. An evaluation of equity and equality in physical activity policies in four European countries |
title | An evaluation of equity and equality in physical activity policies in four European countries |
title_full | An evaluation of equity and equality in physical activity policies in four European countries |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of equity and equality in physical activity policies in four European countries |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of equity and equality in physical activity policies in four European countries |
title_short | An evaluation of equity and equality in physical activity policies in four European countries |
title_sort | evaluation of equity and equality in physical activity policies in four european countries |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122031/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0481-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamalainenriittamaija anevaluationofequityandequalityinphysicalactivitypoliciesinfoureuropeancountries AT sandupetru anevaluationofequityandequalityinphysicalactivitypoliciesinfoureuropeancountries AT syedahmedm anevaluationofequityandequalityinphysicalactivitypoliciesinfoureuropeancountries AT jakobsenmettew anevaluationofequityandequalityinphysicalactivitypoliciesinfoureuropeancountries AT hamalainenriittamaija evaluationofequityandequalityinphysicalactivitypoliciesinfoureuropeancountries AT sandupetru evaluationofequityandequalityinphysicalactivitypoliciesinfoureuropeancountries AT syedahmedm evaluationofequityandequalityinphysicalactivitypoliciesinfoureuropeancountries AT jakobsenmettew evaluationofequityandequalityinphysicalactivitypoliciesinfoureuropeancountries |