Cargando…
Methodology Series Module 6: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis have become an important of biomedical literature, and they provide the “highest level of evidence” for various clinical questions. There are a lot of studies – sometimes with contradictory conclusions – on a particular topic in literature. Hence, as a clinician,...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27904176 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.193663 |
_version_ | 1782469545792897024 |
---|---|
author | Setia, Maninder Singh |
author_facet | Setia, Maninder Singh |
author_sort | Setia, Maninder Singh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Systematic reviews and meta-analysis have become an important of biomedical literature, and they provide the “highest level of evidence” for various clinical questions. There are a lot of studies – sometimes with contradictory conclusions – on a particular topic in literature. Hence, as a clinician, which results will you believe? What will you tell your patient? Which drug is better? A systematic review or a meta-analysis may help us answer these questions. In addition, it may also help us understand the quality of the articles in literature or the type of studies that have been conducted and published (example, randomized trials or observational studies). The first step it to identify a research question for systematic review or meta-analysis. The next step is to identify the articles that will be included in the study. This will be done by searching various databases; it is important that the researcher should search for articles in more than one database. It will also be useful to form a group of researchers and statisticians that have expertise in conducting systematic reviews and meta-analysis before initiating them. We strongly encourage the readers to register their proposed review/meta-analysis with PROSPERO. Finally, these studies should be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis checklist. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5122273 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51222732016-11-30 Methodology Series Module 6: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis Setia, Maninder Singh Indian J Dermatol IJD® Module on Biostatistics and Research Methodology for the Dermatologist - Module Editor: Saumya Panda Systematic reviews and meta-analysis have become an important of biomedical literature, and they provide the “highest level of evidence” for various clinical questions. There are a lot of studies – sometimes with contradictory conclusions – on a particular topic in literature. Hence, as a clinician, which results will you believe? What will you tell your patient? Which drug is better? A systematic review or a meta-analysis may help us answer these questions. In addition, it may also help us understand the quality of the articles in literature or the type of studies that have been conducted and published (example, randomized trials or observational studies). The first step it to identify a research question for systematic review or meta-analysis. The next step is to identify the articles that will be included in the study. This will be done by searching various databases; it is important that the researcher should search for articles in more than one database. It will also be useful to form a group of researchers and statisticians that have expertise in conducting systematic reviews and meta-analysis before initiating them. We strongly encourage the readers to register their proposed review/meta-analysis with PROSPERO. Finally, these studies should be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis checklist. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC5122273/ /pubmed/27904176 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.193663 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Dermatology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | IJD® Module on Biostatistics and Research Methodology for the Dermatologist - Module Editor: Saumya Panda Setia, Maninder Singh Methodology Series Module 6: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis |
title | Methodology Series Module 6: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis |
title_full | Methodology Series Module 6: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Methodology Series Module 6: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Methodology Series Module 6: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis |
title_short | Methodology Series Module 6: Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis |
title_sort | methodology series module 6: systematic reviews and meta-analysis |
topic | IJD® Module on Biostatistics and Research Methodology for the Dermatologist - Module Editor: Saumya Panda |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122273/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27904176 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.193663 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT setiamanindersingh methodologyseriesmodule6systematicreviewsandmetaanalysis |