Cargando…

Gene-expression analysis of gleason grade 3 tumor glands embedded in low- and high-risk prostate cancer

The Gleason score (GS) of prostate cancer on diagnostic biopsies is an important parameter for therapeutic decision-making. Biopsy GS under-estimates the actual GS at radical prostatectomy in a significant number of patients due to sampling artifact. The aim of this study was to identify markers tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hoogland, A. Marije, Böttcher, René, Verhoef, Esther, Jenster, Guido, van Leenders, Geert J.L.H.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Impact Journals LLC 2016
Materias:	Research Paper
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122354/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27191985 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.9344

Ejemplares similares

Novel long non-coding RNAs are specific diagnostic and prognostic markers for prostate cancer
por: Böttcher, René, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Prostate cancer growth patterns beyond the Gleason score: entering a new era of comprehensive tumour grading
por: van Leenders, Geert J L H, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Human PDE4D isoform composition is deregulated in primary prostate cancer and indicative for disease progression and development of distant metastases
por: Böttcher, René, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Morphological and immunohistochemical identification of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in clinical prostate cancer
por: Kolijn, Kimberley, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Differential tissue expression of extracellular vesicle‐derived proteins in prostate cancer
por: Duijvesz, Diederick, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Tissue proteomics outlines AGR2 AND LOX5 as markers for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer
por: Rodríguez-Blanco, Giovanny, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

MET expression during prostate cancer progression
por: Verhoef, Esther I., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Large cribriform growth pattern identifies ISUP grade 2 prostate cancer at high risk for recurrence and metastasis
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cribriform architecture outperforms Gleason pattern 4 percentage and tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in predicting the outcome of Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients
por: Seyrek, Neslisah, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Comedonecrosis Gleason pattern 5 is associated with worse clinical outcome in operated prostate cancer patients
por: Hansum, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cribriform architecture in radical prostatectomies predicts oncological outcome in Gleason score 8 prostate cancer patients
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

mTOR pathway activation is a favorable prognostic factor in human prostate adenocarcinoma
por: Stelloo, Suzan, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Androgen receptor profiling predicts prostate cancer outcome
por: Stelloo, Suzan, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Biochemical Recurrence in Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer in Korean Men: Significance of the Primary Gleason Grade
por: Ro, Yun Kwan, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate cancer: the PANDA challenge
por: Bulten, Wouter, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Prognostic Histopathological and Molecular Markers on Prostate Cancer Needle-Biopsies: A Review
por: Hoogland, A. Marije, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade
por: Zelic, Renata, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists
por: Bulten, Wouter, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Increased SNAIL expression and low syndecan levels are associated with high Gleason grade in prostate cancer
por: POBLETE, CRISTIAN E., et al.
Publicado: (2014)

Differences in survival of prostate cancer Gleason 8–10 disease and the establishment of a new Gleason survival grading system
por: Zhou, Yuan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Narrative review of prostate cancer grading systems: will the Gleason scores be replaced by the Grade Groups?
por: Montironi, Rodolfo, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Alternative prostate cancer grading systems incorporating percent pattern 4/5 (IQ-Gleason) and cribriform architecture (cGrade) improve prediction of outcome after radical prostatectomy
por: Seyrek, Neslisah, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Correlation of concentrations of selected trace elements with Gleason grade of prostate tissues
por: Banas, A., et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Pelvic nodal radiotherapy in Gleason grade group 5 prostate cancer
por: Cook, Kiri, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Clinical outcome comparison of Grade Group 1 and Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with and without cribriform architecture at the time of radical prostatectomy
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern
por: van der Slot, Margaretha A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Prostate Cancer in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome Is Associated with Low Grade Gleason Score When Diagnosed on Biopsy
por: Jeon, Kyoung Pil, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning
por: Arvaniti, Eirini, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Predicting prostate cancer specific-mortality with artificial intelligence-based Gleason grading
por: Wulczyn, Ellery, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Association between Nuclear Morphometry Parameters and Gleason Grade in Patients with Prostatic Cancer
por: Malshy, Kamil, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Non-prostatic pathology on prostate needle-biopsy – colorectal carcinoid: a case report
por: van den Bergh, Roderick CN, et al.
Publicado: (2009)

Inter-observer variability of cribriform architecture and percent Gleason pattern 4 in prostate cancer: relation to clinical outcome
por: van der Slot, Margaretha A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cascaded discrimination of normal, abnormal, and confounder classes in histopathology: Gleason grading of prostate cancer
por: Doyle, Scott, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies
por: Lucas, Marit, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Detecting recurrent prostate Cancer using multiparametric MRI, influence of PSA and Gleason grade
por: Venkatesan, Aradhana M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Automatic Prostate Gleason Grading Using Pyramid Semantic Parsing Network in Digital Histopathology
por: Qiu, Yali, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Clinically applicable Gleason grading (GD) system for prostate cancer based on deep learning
por: Niu, Yun, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Discriminatory Gleason grade group signatures of prostate cancer: An application of machine learning methods
por: Mokoatle, Mpho, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

An international multi-institutional validation study of the algorithm for prostate cancer detection and Gleason grading
por: Tolkach, Yuri, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A Grading from Gleason to the New Grade-Group System: A Historical and Critical Review
por: Barakzai, Muhammad Abrar
Publicado: (2019)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_m53mnul67tp3ld8bebs9onppo2