Cargando…

Assaults against U.S. law enforcement officers in the line-of-duty: situational context and predictors of lethality

BACKGROUND: Research on occupational safety of law enforcement officers (LEOs) has primarily focused on fatal assaults. Nonfatal assaults, however, have received little attention. The goal of this study was to describe the situational contexts in which LEOs are assaulted, and compare these contexts...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Crifasi, Cassandra K., Pollack, Keshia M., Webster, Daniel W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27885587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-016-0094-3
_version_ 1782469592439848960
author Crifasi, Cassandra K.
Pollack, Keshia M.
Webster, Daniel W.
author_facet Crifasi, Cassandra K.
Pollack, Keshia M.
Webster, Daniel W.
author_sort Crifasi, Cassandra K.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Research on occupational safety of law enforcement officers (LEOs) has primarily focused on fatal assaults. Nonfatal assaults, however, have received little attention. The goal of this study was to describe the situational contexts in which LEOs are assaulted, and compare these contexts and risks between fatal and nonfatal assaults in the U.S. Analyzing both types of assaults provides a more complete understanding of occupational safety and opportunities for intervention. METHODS: This study includes a descriptive epidemiology of fatal and nonfatal assaults of LEOs in the U.S. and a pooled cross-sectional analysis of risk factors contributing to the odds of lethal assault. Data were collected from the Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted database. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize fatal and nonfatal assaults. Odds ratios were generated to understand the odds that an assault would result in a fatality. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2013, there were 791 fatal assaults and 2,022 nonfatal assaults of LEOs. Nearly 60% of primary wounds in fatal assaults were received to the head, neck, or throat while nearly 50% of primary wounds in nonfatal assaults were received to the arms/hands or below the waist. The odds that an assault resulted in a fatality decreased by 57% (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.58) when a LEO was wearing body armor. LEOs experiencing an ambush or unprovoked attack had significantly increased odds of an assault resulting in a fatality (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.83 to 5.85 and OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.44 to 3.47 respectively). LEOs that were disarmed during an encounter with a suspect had more than 2-fold increased odds of an assault resulting in a fatality (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.48 to 3.38). CONCLUSIONS: There are specific situational and encounter characteristics that influence the lethality of an assault, which suggest strategies for prevention. Mandatory wear policies for the use of body armor could significantly reduce mortality among assaulted LEOs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40621-016-0094-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5122525
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51225252016-12-08 Assaults against U.S. law enforcement officers in the line-of-duty: situational context and predictors of lethality Crifasi, Cassandra K. Pollack, Keshia M. Webster, Daniel W. Inj Epidemiol Original Contribution BACKGROUND: Research on occupational safety of law enforcement officers (LEOs) has primarily focused on fatal assaults. Nonfatal assaults, however, have received little attention. The goal of this study was to describe the situational contexts in which LEOs are assaulted, and compare these contexts and risks between fatal and nonfatal assaults in the U.S. Analyzing both types of assaults provides a more complete understanding of occupational safety and opportunities for intervention. METHODS: This study includes a descriptive epidemiology of fatal and nonfatal assaults of LEOs in the U.S. and a pooled cross-sectional analysis of risk factors contributing to the odds of lethal assault. Data were collected from the Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted database. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize fatal and nonfatal assaults. Odds ratios were generated to understand the odds that an assault would result in a fatality. RESULTS: Between 1998 and 2013, there were 791 fatal assaults and 2,022 nonfatal assaults of LEOs. Nearly 60% of primary wounds in fatal assaults were received to the head, neck, or throat while nearly 50% of primary wounds in nonfatal assaults were received to the arms/hands or below the waist. The odds that an assault resulted in a fatality decreased by 57% (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.32 to 0.58) when a LEO was wearing body armor. LEOs experiencing an ambush or unprovoked attack had significantly increased odds of an assault resulting in a fatality (OR 3.27, 95% CI 1.83 to 5.85 and OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.44 to 3.47 respectively). LEOs that were disarmed during an encounter with a suspect had more than 2-fold increased odds of an assault resulting in a fatality (OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.48 to 3.38). CONCLUSIONS: There are specific situational and encounter characteristics that influence the lethality of an assault, which suggest strategies for prevention. Mandatory wear policies for the use of body armor could significantly reduce mortality among assaulted LEOs. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s40621-016-0094-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5122525/ /pubmed/27885587 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-016-0094-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Contribution
Crifasi, Cassandra K.
Pollack, Keshia M.
Webster, Daniel W.
Assaults against U.S. law enforcement officers in the line-of-duty: situational context and predictors of lethality
title Assaults against U.S. law enforcement officers in the line-of-duty: situational context and predictors of lethality
title_full Assaults against U.S. law enforcement officers in the line-of-duty: situational context and predictors of lethality
title_fullStr Assaults against U.S. law enforcement officers in the line-of-duty: situational context and predictors of lethality
title_full_unstemmed Assaults against U.S. law enforcement officers in the line-of-duty: situational context and predictors of lethality
title_short Assaults against U.S. law enforcement officers in the line-of-duty: situational context and predictors of lethality
title_sort assaults against u.s. law enforcement officers in the line-of-duty: situational context and predictors of lethality
topic Original Contribution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122525/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27885587
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40621-016-0094-3
work_keys_str_mv AT crifasicassandrak assaultsagainstuslawenforcementofficersinthelineofdutysituationalcontextandpredictorsoflethality
AT pollackkeshiam assaultsagainstuslawenforcementofficersinthelineofdutysituationalcontextandpredictorsoflethality
AT websterdanielw assaultsagainstuslawenforcementofficersinthelineofdutysituationalcontextandpredictorsoflethality