Cargando…

Fascial Free Flap for Reconstruction of the Dorsolateral Hand and Digits: The Advantage of a Thin Contour

BACKGROUND: Fascial free flaps have been widely used for reconstruction of the hand because they are thin. However, studies reporting objective data regarding the advantages of this approach are lacking. Thus, we report our experience with such flaps. METHODS: Forty-five cases of fascial free flaps...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Min Gue, Kim, Jin Soo, Lee, Dong Chul, Roh, Si Young, Lee, Kyung Jin, Choi, Byeong Kyoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27896187
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2016.43.6.551
_version_ 1782469596990668800
author Lee, Min Gue
Kim, Jin Soo
Lee, Dong Chul
Roh, Si Young
Lee, Kyung Jin
Choi, Byeong Kyoo
author_facet Lee, Min Gue
Kim, Jin Soo
Lee, Dong Chul
Roh, Si Young
Lee, Kyung Jin
Choi, Byeong Kyoo
author_sort Lee, Min Gue
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fascial free flaps have been widely used for reconstruction of the hand because they are thin. However, studies reporting objective data regarding the advantages of this approach are lacking. Thus, we report our experience with such flaps. METHODS: Forty-five cases of fascial free flaps between November 2006 and March 2014 were reviewed. Nine cases involving reconstructed dorsal or lateral defects were included. Four anterolateral thigh fascial free flaps and 5 lateral arm fascial free flaps were examined. Maximal flap contour was assessed by measuring reconstructed tissue thickness at the central area from the surface of the skin to below the bone in a vertical manner using ultrasonography and X-ray data. Contralateral regions were examined in the same manner and a comparative analysis was performed. A questionnaire survey regarding aesthetic satisfaction was also administered. RESULTS: All reconstructed parts had a thicker contour than the contralateral side. The average relative percentage of reconstructed tissue thickness was found to be 152% using ultrasonography and 143% using X-ray imaging. According to the aesthetic satisfaction survey, the average rate of satisfaction for patients was 62%, and satisfaction with the flap contour was 72%. CONCLUSIONS: Using a fascial free flap, the reconstructed tissue was approximately 1.5× as thick as the contour of the normal side, which led to positive responses regarding aesthetic satisfaction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5122545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51225452016-11-28 Fascial Free Flap for Reconstruction of the Dorsolateral Hand and Digits: The Advantage of a Thin Contour Lee, Min Gue Kim, Jin Soo Lee, Dong Chul Roh, Si Young Lee, Kyung Jin Choi, Byeong Kyoo Arch Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Fascial free flaps have been widely used for reconstruction of the hand because they are thin. However, studies reporting objective data regarding the advantages of this approach are lacking. Thus, we report our experience with such flaps. METHODS: Forty-five cases of fascial free flaps between November 2006 and March 2014 were reviewed. Nine cases involving reconstructed dorsal or lateral defects were included. Four anterolateral thigh fascial free flaps and 5 lateral arm fascial free flaps were examined. Maximal flap contour was assessed by measuring reconstructed tissue thickness at the central area from the surface of the skin to below the bone in a vertical manner using ultrasonography and X-ray data. Contralateral regions were examined in the same manner and a comparative analysis was performed. A questionnaire survey regarding aesthetic satisfaction was also administered. RESULTS: All reconstructed parts had a thicker contour than the contralateral side. The average relative percentage of reconstructed tissue thickness was found to be 152% using ultrasonography and 143% using X-ray imaging. According to the aesthetic satisfaction survey, the average rate of satisfaction for patients was 62%, and satisfaction with the flap contour was 72%. CONCLUSIONS: Using a fascial free flap, the reconstructed tissue was approximately 1.5× as thick as the contour of the normal side, which led to positive responses regarding aesthetic satisfaction. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2016-11 2016-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5122545/ /pubmed/27896187 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2016.43.6.551 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Min Gue
Kim, Jin Soo
Lee, Dong Chul
Roh, Si Young
Lee, Kyung Jin
Choi, Byeong Kyoo
Fascial Free Flap for Reconstruction of the Dorsolateral Hand and Digits: The Advantage of a Thin Contour
title Fascial Free Flap for Reconstruction of the Dorsolateral Hand and Digits: The Advantage of a Thin Contour
title_full Fascial Free Flap for Reconstruction of the Dorsolateral Hand and Digits: The Advantage of a Thin Contour
title_fullStr Fascial Free Flap for Reconstruction of the Dorsolateral Hand and Digits: The Advantage of a Thin Contour
title_full_unstemmed Fascial Free Flap for Reconstruction of the Dorsolateral Hand and Digits: The Advantage of a Thin Contour
title_short Fascial Free Flap for Reconstruction of the Dorsolateral Hand and Digits: The Advantage of a Thin Contour
title_sort fascial free flap for reconstruction of the dorsolateral hand and digits: the advantage of a thin contour
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27896187
http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2016.43.6.551
work_keys_str_mv AT leemingue fascialfreeflapforreconstructionofthedorsolateralhandanddigitstheadvantageofathincontour
AT kimjinsoo fascialfreeflapforreconstructionofthedorsolateralhandanddigitstheadvantageofathincontour
AT leedongchul fascialfreeflapforreconstructionofthedorsolateralhandanddigitstheadvantageofathincontour
AT rohsiyoung fascialfreeflapforreconstructionofthedorsolateralhandanddigitstheadvantageofathincontour
AT leekyungjin fascialfreeflapforreconstructionofthedorsolateralhandanddigitstheadvantageofathincontour
AT choibyeongkyoo fascialfreeflapforreconstructionofthedorsolateralhandanddigitstheadvantageofathincontour