Cargando…
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars
BACKGROUND: Open thyroidectomy is conventionally performed at the anterior side of neck, which is a body part with a comparatively great degree of open exposure; due to this, postoperative scarring may cause distress in patients. We aimed to compare the effects of ablative and nonablative fractional...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27896191 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2016.43.6.575 |
_version_ | 1782469597914464256 |
---|---|
author | Jang, Jin-Uk Kim, Soo-Young Yoon, Eul-Sik Kim, Woo-Kyung Park, Seung-Ha Lee, Byung-Il Kim, Deok-Woo |
author_facet | Jang, Jin-Uk Kim, Soo-Young Yoon, Eul-Sik Kim, Woo-Kyung Park, Seung-Ha Lee, Byung-Il Kim, Deok-Woo |
author_sort | Jang, Jin-Uk |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Open thyroidectomy is conventionally performed at the anterior side of neck, which is a body part with a comparatively great degree of open exposure; due to this, postoperative scarring may cause distress in patients. We aimed to compare the effects of ablative and nonablative fractional laser treatments on thyroidectomy scars. We examined medical records in a retrospective manner and analyzed scars based on their digital images by using the modified Manchester Scar Scale (mMSS). METHODS: Between February 2012 and May 2013, 55 patients with thyroidectomy scars were treated with ablative (34 patients) or nonablative (21 patients) fractional laser. Each patient underwent 4 laser treatment sessions in 3–4 week intervals, 1–2 months postoperatively. Scar improvement was assessed using patient images and the mMSS scale. RESULTS: The mean decrease in scar score was 3.91 and 3.47 in the ablative and nonablative groups, respectively; the reduction between 2 groups did not exhibit any significant difference (P=0.16). We used the scale once again to individually evaluate scar attributes. The nonablative group accounted for a considerably higher color score value (P=0.03); the ablative group accounted for a considerably higher contour score value (P<0.01). Patient satisfaction was high and no complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Both types of fractional laser treatments can be used successfully for thyroidectomy scar treatment with minimal complications; however, results indicate that higher effectiveness may be obtained from the use of ablative and nonablative lasers for hypertrophic scars and early erythematous scars, respectively. Therefore, the appropriate laser for scar treatment should be selected according to its specific characteristics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5122549 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-51225492016-11-28 Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars Jang, Jin-Uk Kim, Soo-Young Yoon, Eul-Sik Kim, Woo-Kyung Park, Seung-Ha Lee, Byung-Il Kim, Deok-Woo Arch Plast Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Open thyroidectomy is conventionally performed at the anterior side of neck, which is a body part with a comparatively great degree of open exposure; due to this, postoperative scarring may cause distress in patients. We aimed to compare the effects of ablative and nonablative fractional laser treatments on thyroidectomy scars. We examined medical records in a retrospective manner and analyzed scars based on their digital images by using the modified Manchester Scar Scale (mMSS). METHODS: Between February 2012 and May 2013, 55 patients with thyroidectomy scars were treated with ablative (34 patients) or nonablative (21 patients) fractional laser. Each patient underwent 4 laser treatment sessions in 3–4 week intervals, 1–2 months postoperatively. Scar improvement was assessed using patient images and the mMSS scale. RESULTS: The mean decrease in scar score was 3.91 and 3.47 in the ablative and nonablative groups, respectively; the reduction between 2 groups did not exhibit any significant difference (P=0.16). We used the scale once again to individually evaluate scar attributes. The nonablative group accounted for a considerably higher color score value (P=0.03); the ablative group accounted for a considerably higher contour score value (P<0.01). Patient satisfaction was high and no complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Both types of fractional laser treatments can be used successfully for thyroidectomy scar treatment with minimal complications; however, results indicate that higher effectiveness may be obtained from the use of ablative and nonablative lasers for hypertrophic scars and early erythematous scars, respectively. Therefore, the appropriate laser for scar treatment should be selected according to its specific characteristics. The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2016-11 2016-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5122549/ /pubmed/27896191 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2016.43.6.575 Text en Copyright © 2016 The Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jang, Jin-Uk Kim, Soo-Young Yoon, Eul-Sik Kim, Woo-Kyung Park, Seung-Ha Lee, Byung-Il Kim, Deok-Woo Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars |
title | Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars |
title_full | Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars |
title_short | Comparison of the Effectiveness of Ablative and Non-Ablative Fractional Laser Treatments for Early Stage Thyroidectomy Scars |
title_sort | comparison of the effectiveness of ablative and non-ablative fractional laser treatments for early stage thyroidectomy scars |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122549/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27896191 http://dx.doi.org/10.5999/aps.2016.43.6.575 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jangjinuk comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars AT kimsooyoung comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars AT yooneulsik comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars AT kimwookyung comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars AT parkseungha comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars AT leebyungil comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars AT kimdeokwoo comparisonoftheeffectivenessofablativeandnonablativefractionallasertreatmentsforearlystagethyroidectomyscars |