Cargando…

Patient-Specific Electric Field Simulations and Acceleration Measurements for Objective Analysis of Intraoperative Stimulation Tests in the Thalamus

Despite an increasing use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) the fundamental mechanisms of action remain largely unknown. Simulation of electric entities has previously been proposed for chronic DBS combined with subjective symptom evaluations, but not for intraoperative stimulation tests. The present...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hemm, Simone, Pison, Daniela, Alonso, Fabiola, Shah, Ashesh, Coste, Jérôme, Lemaire, Jean-Jacques, Wårdell, Karin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27932961
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00577
_version_ 1782469607533051904
author Hemm, Simone
Pison, Daniela
Alonso, Fabiola
Shah, Ashesh
Coste, Jérôme
Lemaire, Jean-Jacques
Wårdell, Karin
author_facet Hemm, Simone
Pison, Daniela
Alonso, Fabiola
Shah, Ashesh
Coste, Jérôme
Lemaire, Jean-Jacques
Wårdell, Karin
author_sort Hemm, Simone
collection PubMed
description Despite an increasing use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) the fundamental mechanisms of action remain largely unknown. Simulation of electric entities has previously been proposed for chronic DBS combined with subjective symptom evaluations, but not for intraoperative stimulation tests. The present paper introduces a method for an objective exploitation of intraoperative stimulation test data to identify the optimal implant position of the chronic DBS lead by relating the electric field (EF) simulations to the patient-specific anatomy and the clinical effects quantified by accelerometry. To illustrate the feasibility of this approach, it was applied to five patients with essential tremor bilaterally implanted in the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM). The VIM and its neighborhood structures were preoperatively outlined in 3D on white matter attenuated inversion recovery MR images. Quantitative intraoperative clinical assessments were performed using accelerometry. EF simulations (n = 272) for intraoperative stimulation test data performed along two trajectories per side were set-up using the finite element method for 143 stimulation test positions. The resulting EF isosurface of 0.2 V/mm was superimposed to the outlined anatomical structures. The percentage of volume of each structure’s overlap was calculated and related to the corresponding clinical improvement. The proposed concept has been successfully applied to the five patients. For higher clinical improvements, not only the VIM but as well other neighboring structures were covered by the EF isosurfaces. The percentage of the volumes of the VIM, of the nucleus intermediate lateral of the thalamus and the prelemniscal radiations within the prerubral field of Forel increased for clinical improvements higher than 50% compared to improvements lower than 50%. The presented new concept allows a detailed and objective analysis of a high amount of intraoperative data to identify the optimal stimulation target. First results indicate agreement with published data hypothesizing that the stimulation of other structures than the VIM might be responsible for good clinical effects in essential tremor. (Clinical trial reference number: Ref: 2011-A00774-37/AU905)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5122591
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51225912016-12-08 Patient-Specific Electric Field Simulations and Acceleration Measurements for Objective Analysis of Intraoperative Stimulation Tests in the Thalamus Hemm, Simone Pison, Daniela Alonso, Fabiola Shah, Ashesh Coste, Jérôme Lemaire, Jean-Jacques Wårdell, Karin Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Despite an increasing use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) the fundamental mechanisms of action remain largely unknown. Simulation of electric entities has previously been proposed for chronic DBS combined with subjective symptom evaluations, but not for intraoperative stimulation tests. The present paper introduces a method for an objective exploitation of intraoperative stimulation test data to identify the optimal implant position of the chronic DBS lead by relating the electric field (EF) simulations to the patient-specific anatomy and the clinical effects quantified by accelerometry. To illustrate the feasibility of this approach, it was applied to five patients with essential tremor bilaterally implanted in the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM). The VIM and its neighborhood structures were preoperatively outlined in 3D on white matter attenuated inversion recovery MR images. Quantitative intraoperative clinical assessments were performed using accelerometry. EF simulations (n = 272) for intraoperative stimulation test data performed along two trajectories per side were set-up using the finite element method for 143 stimulation test positions. The resulting EF isosurface of 0.2 V/mm was superimposed to the outlined anatomical structures. The percentage of volume of each structure’s overlap was calculated and related to the corresponding clinical improvement. The proposed concept has been successfully applied to the five patients. For higher clinical improvements, not only the VIM but as well other neighboring structures were covered by the EF isosurfaces. The percentage of the volumes of the VIM, of the nucleus intermediate lateral of the thalamus and the prelemniscal radiations within the prerubral field of Forel increased for clinical improvements higher than 50% compared to improvements lower than 50%. The presented new concept allows a detailed and objective analysis of a high amount of intraoperative data to identify the optimal stimulation target. First results indicate agreement with published data hypothesizing that the stimulation of other structures than the VIM might be responsible for good clinical effects in essential tremor. (Clinical trial reference number: Ref: 2011-A00774-37/AU905) Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5122591/ /pubmed/27932961 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00577 Text en Copyright © 2016 Hemm, Pison, Alonso, Shah, Coste, Lemaire and Wårdell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Hemm, Simone
Pison, Daniela
Alonso, Fabiola
Shah, Ashesh
Coste, Jérôme
Lemaire, Jean-Jacques
Wårdell, Karin
Patient-Specific Electric Field Simulations and Acceleration Measurements for Objective Analysis of Intraoperative Stimulation Tests in the Thalamus
title Patient-Specific Electric Field Simulations and Acceleration Measurements for Objective Analysis of Intraoperative Stimulation Tests in the Thalamus
title_full Patient-Specific Electric Field Simulations and Acceleration Measurements for Objective Analysis of Intraoperative Stimulation Tests in the Thalamus
title_fullStr Patient-Specific Electric Field Simulations and Acceleration Measurements for Objective Analysis of Intraoperative Stimulation Tests in the Thalamus
title_full_unstemmed Patient-Specific Electric Field Simulations and Acceleration Measurements for Objective Analysis of Intraoperative Stimulation Tests in the Thalamus
title_short Patient-Specific Electric Field Simulations and Acceleration Measurements for Objective Analysis of Intraoperative Stimulation Tests in the Thalamus
title_sort patient-specific electric field simulations and acceleration measurements for objective analysis of intraoperative stimulation tests in the thalamus
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122591/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27932961
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2016.00577
work_keys_str_mv AT hemmsimone patientspecificelectricfieldsimulationsandaccelerationmeasurementsforobjectiveanalysisofintraoperativestimulationtestsinthethalamus
AT pisondaniela patientspecificelectricfieldsimulationsandaccelerationmeasurementsforobjectiveanalysisofintraoperativestimulationtestsinthethalamus
AT alonsofabiola patientspecificelectricfieldsimulationsandaccelerationmeasurementsforobjectiveanalysisofintraoperativestimulationtestsinthethalamus
AT shahashesh patientspecificelectricfieldsimulationsandaccelerationmeasurementsforobjectiveanalysisofintraoperativestimulationtestsinthethalamus
AT costejerome patientspecificelectricfieldsimulationsandaccelerationmeasurementsforobjectiveanalysisofintraoperativestimulationtestsinthethalamus
AT lemairejeanjacques patientspecificelectricfieldsimulationsandaccelerationmeasurementsforobjectiveanalysisofintraoperativestimulationtestsinthethalamus
AT wardellkarin patientspecificelectricfieldsimulationsandaccelerationmeasurementsforobjectiveanalysisofintraoperativestimulationtestsinthethalamus