Cargando…

Efficacy of Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose, SurgiGuard®, in Porcine Surgery

PURPOSE: Adequate hemostasis is important for postoperative outcomes of abdominal surgery. This study evaluated the hemostatic effects and accompanying histopathological changes of a novel oxidized regenerated cellulose, SurgiGuard®, during abdominal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten pigs underwen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Sung Hyun, Kim, Se Hoon, Yoon, Hye Sung, Kim, Hyun Kyoon, Kim, Kyung Sik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27873514
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2017.58.1.195
_version_ 1782469618125766656
author Kim, Sung Hyun
Kim, Se Hoon
Yoon, Hye Sung
Kim, Hyun Kyoon
Kim, Kyung Sik
author_facet Kim, Sung Hyun
Kim, Se Hoon
Yoon, Hye Sung
Kim, Hyun Kyoon
Kim, Kyung Sik
author_sort Kim, Sung Hyun
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Adequate hemostasis is important for postoperative outcomes of abdominal surgery. This study evaluated the hemostatic effects and accompanying histopathological changes of a novel oxidized regenerated cellulose, SurgiGuard®, during abdominal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten pigs underwent wedge resection of the spleen (1×1 cm) and liver (1.5×1.5 cm). The resected surface was covered with Surgicel® fabric or fibril type (Group A) or SurgiGuard® fabric or fibril type (Group B). Surgicel® and SurgiGuard® were randomized for attachment to the resected surface by fabric type (n=5) or fibril type (n=5). Blood loss was measured 5, 7, and 9 min after resection. Pigs were necropsied 6 weeks postoperatively to evaluate gross and histopathological changes. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in total blood loss between groups [spleen fabric: Group A vs. Group B, 4.38 g (2.74–6.43) vs. 3.41 g (2.46–4.65), p=0.436; spleen fibril: Group A vs. Group B, 3.44 g (2.82–6.07) vs. 3.60 g (2.03–6.09), p=0.971; liver fabric: Group A vs. Group B, 4.51 g (2.67–10.61) vs. 6.93 g (3.09–9.95), p=0.796; liver fibril: Group A vs. Group B, 3.32 g (2.50–8.78) vs. 3.70 g (2.32–5.84), p=0.971]. Histopathological analysis revealed no significant difference in toxicities related to Surgicel® or SurgiGuard® [inflammation, fibrosis, foreign bodies, and hemorrhage (spleen: p=0.333, 0.127, 0.751, and 1.000; liver: p=0.155, 0.751, 1.000, and 1.000, respectively)]. CONCLUSION: SurgiGuard® is as effective and non-toxic as Surgicel® in achieving hemostasis after porcine abdominal surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5122638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Yonsei University College of Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51226382017-01-01 Efficacy of Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose, SurgiGuard®, in Porcine Surgery Kim, Sung Hyun Kim, Se Hoon Yoon, Hye Sung Kim, Hyun Kyoon Kim, Kyung Sik Yonsei Med J Original Article PURPOSE: Adequate hemostasis is important for postoperative outcomes of abdominal surgery. This study evaluated the hemostatic effects and accompanying histopathological changes of a novel oxidized regenerated cellulose, SurgiGuard®, during abdominal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten pigs underwent wedge resection of the spleen (1×1 cm) and liver (1.5×1.5 cm). The resected surface was covered with Surgicel® fabric or fibril type (Group A) or SurgiGuard® fabric or fibril type (Group B). Surgicel® and SurgiGuard® were randomized for attachment to the resected surface by fabric type (n=5) or fibril type (n=5). Blood loss was measured 5, 7, and 9 min after resection. Pigs were necropsied 6 weeks postoperatively to evaluate gross and histopathological changes. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in total blood loss between groups [spleen fabric: Group A vs. Group B, 4.38 g (2.74–6.43) vs. 3.41 g (2.46–4.65), p=0.436; spleen fibril: Group A vs. Group B, 3.44 g (2.82–6.07) vs. 3.60 g (2.03–6.09), p=0.971; liver fabric: Group A vs. Group B, 4.51 g (2.67–10.61) vs. 6.93 g (3.09–9.95), p=0.796; liver fibril: Group A vs. Group B, 3.32 g (2.50–8.78) vs. 3.70 g (2.32–5.84), p=0.971]. Histopathological analysis revealed no significant difference in toxicities related to Surgicel® or SurgiGuard® [inflammation, fibrosis, foreign bodies, and hemorrhage (spleen: p=0.333, 0.127, 0.751, and 1.000; liver: p=0.155, 0.751, 1.000, and 1.000, respectively)]. CONCLUSION: SurgiGuard® is as effective and non-toxic as Surgicel® in achieving hemostasis after porcine abdominal surgery. Yonsei University College of Medicine 2017-01-01 2016-11-07 /pmc/articles/PMC5122638/ /pubmed/27873514 http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2017.58.1.195 Text en © Copyright: Yonsei University College of Medicine 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Sung Hyun
Kim, Se Hoon
Yoon, Hye Sung
Kim, Hyun Kyoon
Kim, Kyung Sik
Efficacy of Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose, SurgiGuard®, in Porcine Surgery
title Efficacy of Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose, SurgiGuard®, in Porcine Surgery
title_full Efficacy of Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose, SurgiGuard®, in Porcine Surgery
title_fullStr Efficacy of Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose, SurgiGuard®, in Porcine Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose, SurgiGuard®, in Porcine Surgery
title_short Efficacy of Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose, SurgiGuard®, in Porcine Surgery
title_sort efficacy of oxidized regenerated cellulose, surgiguard®, in porcine surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27873514
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2017.58.1.195
work_keys_str_mv AT kimsunghyun efficacyofoxidizedregeneratedcellulosesurgiguardinporcinesurgery
AT kimsehoon efficacyofoxidizedregeneratedcellulosesurgiguardinporcinesurgery
AT yoonhyesung efficacyofoxidizedregeneratedcellulosesurgiguardinporcinesurgery
AT kimhyunkyoon efficacyofoxidizedregeneratedcellulosesurgiguardinporcinesurgery
AT kimkyungsik efficacyofoxidizedregeneratedcellulosesurgiguardinporcinesurgery