Cargando…
Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking
The designing, collecting, analyzing, and reporting of psychological studies entail many choices that are often arbitrary. The opportunistic use of these so-called researcher degrees of freedom aimed at obtaining statistically significant results is problematic because it enhances the chances of fal...
Autores principales: | Wicherts, Jelte M., Veldkamp, Coosje L. S., Augusteijn, Hilde E. M., Bakker, Marjan, van Aert, Robbie C. M., van Assen, Marcel A. L. M. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122713/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27933012 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01832 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Conducting Meta-Analyses Based on p Values: Reservations and Recommendations for Applying p-Uniform and p-Curve
por: van Aert, Robbie C. M., et al.
Publicado: (2016) -
Publication bias examined in meta-analyses from psychology and medicine: A meta-meta-analysis
por: van Aert, Robbie C. M., et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Recommendations in pre-registrations and internal review board proposals promote formal power analyses but do not increase sample size
por: Bakker, Marjan, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Who Believes in the Storybook Image of the Scientist?
por: Veldkamp, Coosje L. S., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Why Publishing Everything Is More Effective than Selective Publishing of Statistically Significant Results
por: van Assen, Marcel A. L. M., et al.
Publicado: (2014)