Cargando…

Differences in the Mechanical Properties of the Developing Cerebral Cortical Proliferative Zone between Mice and Ferrets at both the Tissue and Single-Cell Levels

Cell-producing events in developing tissues are mechanically dynamic throughout the cell cycle. In many epithelial systems, cells are apicobasally tall, with nuclei and somata that adopt different apicobasal positions because nuclei and somata move in a cell cycle–dependent manner. This movement is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagasaka, Arata, Shinoda, Tomoyasu, Kawaue, Takumi, Suzuki, Makoto, Nagayama, Kazuaki, Matsumoto, Takeo, Ueno, Naoto, Kawaguchi, Ayano, Miyata, Takaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27933293
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2016.00139
_version_ 1782469639718043648
author Nagasaka, Arata
Shinoda, Tomoyasu
Kawaue, Takumi
Suzuki, Makoto
Nagayama, Kazuaki
Matsumoto, Takeo
Ueno, Naoto
Kawaguchi, Ayano
Miyata, Takaki
author_facet Nagasaka, Arata
Shinoda, Tomoyasu
Kawaue, Takumi
Suzuki, Makoto
Nagayama, Kazuaki
Matsumoto, Takeo
Ueno, Naoto
Kawaguchi, Ayano
Miyata, Takaki
author_sort Nagasaka, Arata
collection PubMed
description Cell-producing events in developing tissues are mechanically dynamic throughout the cell cycle. In many epithelial systems, cells are apicobasally tall, with nuclei and somata that adopt different apicobasal positions because nuclei and somata move in a cell cycle–dependent manner. This movement is apical during G2 phase and basal during G1 phase, whereas mitosis occurs at the apical surface. These movements are collectively referred to as interkinetic nuclear migration, and such epithelia are called “pseudostratified.” The embryonic mammalian cerebral cortical neuroepithelium is a good model for highly pseudostratified epithelia, and we previously found differences between mice and ferrets in both horizontal cellular density (greater in ferrets) and nuclear/somal movements (slower during G2 and faster during G1 in ferrets). These differences suggest that neuroepithelial cells alter their nucleokinetic behavior in response to physical factors that they encounter, which may form the basis for evolutionary transitions toward more abundant brain-cell production from mice to ferrets and primates. To address how mouse and ferret neuroepithelia may differ physically in a quantitative manner, we used atomic force microscopy to determine that the vertical stiffness of their apical surface is greater in ferrets (Young's modulus = 1700 Pa) than in mice (1400 Pa). We systematically analyzed factors underlying the apical-surface stiffness through experiments to pharmacologically inhibit actomyosin or microtubules and to examine recoiling behaviors of the apical surface upon laser ablation and also through electron microscopy to observe adherens junction. We found that although both actomyosin and microtubules are partly responsible for the apical-surface stiffness, the mouse<ferret relationship in the apical-surface stiffness was maintained even in the presence of inhibitors. We also found that the stiffness of single, dissociated neuroepithelial cells is actually greater in mice (720 Pa) than in ferrets (450 Pa). Adherens junction was ultrastructurally comparable between mice and ferrets. These results show that the horizontally denser packing of neuroepithelial cell processes is a major contributor to the increased tissue-level apical stiffness in ferrets, and suggest that tissue-level mechanical properties may be achieved by balancing cellular densification and the physical properties of single cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5122735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-51227352016-12-08 Differences in the Mechanical Properties of the Developing Cerebral Cortical Proliferative Zone between Mice and Ferrets at both the Tissue and Single-Cell Levels Nagasaka, Arata Shinoda, Tomoyasu Kawaue, Takumi Suzuki, Makoto Nagayama, Kazuaki Matsumoto, Takeo Ueno, Naoto Kawaguchi, Ayano Miyata, Takaki Front Cell Dev Biol Cell and Developmental Biology Cell-producing events in developing tissues are mechanically dynamic throughout the cell cycle. In many epithelial systems, cells are apicobasally tall, with nuclei and somata that adopt different apicobasal positions because nuclei and somata move in a cell cycle–dependent manner. This movement is apical during G2 phase and basal during G1 phase, whereas mitosis occurs at the apical surface. These movements are collectively referred to as interkinetic nuclear migration, and such epithelia are called “pseudostratified.” The embryonic mammalian cerebral cortical neuroepithelium is a good model for highly pseudostratified epithelia, and we previously found differences between mice and ferrets in both horizontal cellular density (greater in ferrets) and nuclear/somal movements (slower during G2 and faster during G1 in ferrets). These differences suggest that neuroepithelial cells alter their nucleokinetic behavior in response to physical factors that they encounter, which may form the basis for evolutionary transitions toward more abundant brain-cell production from mice to ferrets and primates. To address how mouse and ferret neuroepithelia may differ physically in a quantitative manner, we used atomic force microscopy to determine that the vertical stiffness of their apical surface is greater in ferrets (Young's modulus = 1700 Pa) than in mice (1400 Pa). We systematically analyzed factors underlying the apical-surface stiffness through experiments to pharmacologically inhibit actomyosin or microtubules and to examine recoiling behaviors of the apical surface upon laser ablation and also through electron microscopy to observe adherens junction. We found that although both actomyosin and microtubules are partly responsible for the apical-surface stiffness, the mouse<ferret relationship in the apical-surface stiffness was maintained even in the presence of inhibitors. We also found that the stiffness of single, dissociated neuroepithelial cells is actually greater in mice (720 Pa) than in ferrets (450 Pa). Adherens junction was ultrastructurally comparable between mice and ferrets. These results show that the horizontally denser packing of neuroepithelial cell processes is a major contributor to the increased tissue-level apical stiffness in ferrets, and suggest that tissue-level mechanical properties may be achieved by balancing cellular densification and the physical properties of single cells. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC5122735/ /pubmed/27933293 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2016.00139 Text en Copyright © 2016 Nagasaka, Shinoda, Kawaue, Suzuki, Nagayama, Matsumoto, Ueno, Kawaguchi and Miyata. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cell and Developmental Biology
Nagasaka, Arata
Shinoda, Tomoyasu
Kawaue, Takumi
Suzuki, Makoto
Nagayama, Kazuaki
Matsumoto, Takeo
Ueno, Naoto
Kawaguchi, Ayano
Miyata, Takaki
Differences in the Mechanical Properties of the Developing Cerebral Cortical Proliferative Zone between Mice and Ferrets at both the Tissue and Single-Cell Levels
title Differences in the Mechanical Properties of the Developing Cerebral Cortical Proliferative Zone between Mice and Ferrets at both the Tissue and Single-Cell Levels
title_full Differences in the Mechanical Properties of the Developing Cerebral Cortical Proliferative Zone between Mice and Ferrets at both the Tissue and Single-Cell Levels
title_fullStr Differences in the Mechanical Properties of the Developing Cerebral Cortical Proliferative Zone between Mice and Ferrets at both the Tissue and Single-Cell Levels
title_full_unstemmed Differences in the Mechanical Properties of the Developing Cerebral Cortical Proliferative Zone between Mice and Ferrets at both the Tissue and Single-Cell Levels
title_short Differences in the Mechanical Properties of the Developing Cerebral Cortical Proliferative Zone between Mice and Ferrets at both the Tissue and Single-Cell Levels
title_sort differences in the mechanical properties of the developing cerebral cortical proliferative zone between mice and ferrets at both the tissue and single-cell levels
topic Cell and Developmental Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5122735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27933293
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2016.00139
work_keys_str_mv AT nagasakaarata differencesinthemechanicalpropertiesofthedevelopingcerebralcorticalproliferativezonebetweenmiceandferretsatboththetissueandsinglecelllevels
AT shinodatomoyasu differencesinthemechanicalpropertiesofthedevelopingcerebralcorticalproliferativezonebetweenmiceandferretsatboththetissueandsinglecelllevels
AT kawauetakumi differencesinthemechanicalpropertiesofthedevelopingcerebralcorticalproliferativezonebetweenmiceandferretsatboththetissueandsinglecelllevels
AT suzukimakoto differencesinthemechanicalpropertiesofthedevelopingcerebralcorticalproliferativezonebetweenmiceandferretsatboththetissueandsinglecelllevels
AT nagayamakazuaki differencesinthemechanicalpropertiesofthedevelopingcerebralcorticalproliferativezonebetweenmiceandferretsatboththetissueandsinglecelllevels
AT matsumototakeo differencesinthemechanicalpropertiesofthedevelopingcerebralcorticalproliferativezonebetweenmiceandferretsatboththetissueandsinglecelllevels
AT uenonaoto differencesinthemechanicalpropertiesofthedevelopingcerebralcorticalproliferativezonebetweenmiceandferretsatboththetissueandsinglecelllevels
AT kawaguchiayano differencesinthemechanicalpropertiesofthedevelopingcerebralcorticalproliferativezonebetweenmiceandferretsatboththetissueandsinglecelllevels
AT miyatatakaki differencesinthemechanicalpropertiesofthedevelopingcerebralcorticalproliferativezonebetweenmiceandferretsatboththetissueandsinglecelllevels